Safe fixation with two acetabular screws after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy

References

• Ahl T, Dalen N, Lundberg A, Wykman A. Biodegradable fixation of ankle fractures. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of 32 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 166–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminian A, Mahar A, Yassir W, Newton P, Wenger D. Freedom of acetabular fragment rotation following three surgical techniques for correction of congenital deformities of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 10–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armand M, Lepisto J, Tallroth K, Elias J, Chao E. Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 303–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babis G C, Trousdale R T, Jenkyn T R, Kaufman K. Comparison of two methods of screw fixation in periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop 2002, 403: 221–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooperman D R, Wallensten R, Stulberg S D. Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop 1983, 175: 79–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaunay S, Dussault R G, Kaplan P A, Alford B A. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26: 75–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh T S, Mast J W. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop 1988, 232: 26–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansson L I, Olsson T H, Selvik G, Sunde´n G. A Roentgen stereophotogrammetric investigation of innominate osteotomy (Salter). Acta Orthop Scand 1978; 49: 68–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanat R, Makinen T J, Moritz N, Mattila K T, Aro H T. Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of three-dimensional micromotion in a fracture model of the distal radius. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 481–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matta J M, Stover M D, Siebenrock K. Periacetabular osteotomy through the Smith-Petersen approach. Clin Orthop 1999, 363: 21–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattsson P, Larsson S. Stability of internally fixed femoral neck fractures augmented with resorbable cement. A prospective randomized study using radiostereometry. Scand J Surg 2003; 92: 215–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattsson P, Larsson S. Unstable trochanteric fractures augmented with calcium phosphate cement A prospective randomized study using radiostereometry to measure fracture stability. Scand J Surg 2004; 93: 223–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mechlenburg I, Nyengaard J R, Romer L, Soballe K. Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 147–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogliacomi F, Stark A, Wallensten R. Periacetabular osteotomy. Good pain relief in symptomatic hip dysplasia, 32 patients followed for 4 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 67–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragnarsson J I, Eliasson P, Karrholm J, Lundstrom B. The accuracy of measurements of femoral neck fractures. Conventional radiography versus roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 152–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiramizu K, Naito M, Asayama I, Yatsunami M. A quantitative anatomic characterization of the quadrilateral surface for periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop 2004, 418: 157–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siebenrock K A, Scholl E, Lottenbach M, Ganz R. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop 1999, 363: 9–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soballe K. Pelvic osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 117–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To¨nnis D. Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Tsumura H, Kaku N, Ikeda S, Torisu T. A computer simulation of rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplastic hip joint: does the optimal transposition of the acetabular fragment exist. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 145–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela R G, Cabanela M E, Trousdale R T. Sexual activity, pregnancy, and childbirth after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop 2004, 418: 146–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valstar E R. Digital roentgen stereophotogrammetry: Development, validation, and clinical application. Leiden University. 2001, Thesis/Dis-sertation
   Google Scholar
• Valstar E R, Vrooman H A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Ryd L, Nelissen R G. Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. J Biomech 2000; 33: 1593–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrooman H A, Valstar E R, Brand G J, Admiraal D R, Rozing P M, Reiber J H. Fast and accurate automated measurements in digitized stereophotogrammetric radiographs. J Biomech 1998; 31: 491–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiberg G. A measuring method for distinguishing between a normal and a maldeveloped acetabulum. Acta Chir Scand 1939; 83: 28–38
   Google Scholar
• Yassir W, Mahar A, Aminian A, Newton P, Wenger D. A comparison of the fixation stability of multiple screw constructs for two types of pelvic osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 14–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar