Quantification of polyethylene degradation in mobile bearing knees: A retrieval analysis of the Anterior-Posterior-Glide (APG) and Rotating Platform (RP) Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee

References

• Akisue T, Yamaguchi M, Bauer T W, Takikara S, Schils J P, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M. Backside deformation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(6)784–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Argenson J N, O’Connor J J. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992; 74: 228–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benjamin J, Szivek J, Dersam G, Persselin S, Johnson R. Linear and volumetric wear of tibial inserts in posterior cruciate retaining knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 2001, 392: 131–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buechel F F. Review. Mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: rotation is our salvation!. Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2004; 19: 27–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaghan J J. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: clinical results: a review of the literature. Clin Orthop 2001, 392: 221–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collier J P, Mayor M B, McNamara J L, Suprenant V A, Jensen R E. Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components. Clin Orthop 1991, 273: 232–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conditt M. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87(2)326–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis D, Lynch C. Rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. 2004, http://www.medscape.com
   Google Scholar
• Furman B D, Schmieg J J, Bhattacharyya S, Li S. Assessment of backside polyethylene wear in three different metal backed total knee designs. 1999, 45th Annual meeting Orthopaedic research society
   Google Scholar
• Gill H S, Waite J C, Short A, Kellert C F, Price A J, Murray D W. In vivo measurement of volumetric wear of a total knee replacement. The Knee 2006; 13: 312–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailey J L, Fisher J, Dowson D, Sampath Johnson R, Elloy M. A tribological study of a series of retrieved Accord knee explants. Med Eng Phys 1994; 16: 223–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood R W, Wright T M, Burstein A H. Retrieval analysis of total knee Prostheses: A method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mat Res 1983; 17: 829–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshino A, Fukuoka Y, Ishida A. Accurate in vivo measurement of polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(4)490–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang C H, Ma H M, Liau J J, Ho F Y, Cheng C K. Osteolysis in failed total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84(12)2224–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones V C, Williams I R, Auger D D, Walsh W, Barton D C, Stone M H, Fisher J. Quantification of third body damage to the tibial counterface in mobile bearing knees. Proc Inst Mech Eng 2001; 215(2)171–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilgus D J. Polyethylene wear in mobile bearing prostheses. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 227–33
   Google Scholar
• Kuster M S, Stachowiak G W. Factors affecting polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 235–42
   Google Scholar
• Lavernia C J, Sierra R J, Hungerford D S, Krackow K. Activity level and wear in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(4)446–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen H M, Fisher J, Goldsmith A A, Auger D D, Hardaker M, Stone M H. Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; 12(10-12)1049–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morberg P, Chapman-Sheath P, Morris P, Cain S, Walsh W R. The function of the posterior cruciate ligament in an antroposterior-gliding rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(4)484–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muratoglu O K, Greenbaum E S, Bragdon C R, Jasty M, Freiberg A A, Harris W H. Surface analysis of early retrieved acetabular polyethylene liners. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 68–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierson J. Fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty: Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs substitution, http://www. medscape.com
   Google Scholar
• Plante-Bordeneuve P, Freeman M A. Tibial high density polyethylene wear in conforming tibiofemoral prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 630–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polyzoides A J, Tsakonas A, Brooks S, Pickford M. Design characteristics experimental studies and ten years of clinical experience with a fully conforming mobile bearing knee prostheses. Proc of the Intl Symp on the Knee. Inst Mech Eng London. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Price A J, Short A, Kellert C, Beard D, Gill H, Pandit H, Dodd C A, Murray D W. Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87(11)1493–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao A R, Engh G A, Collier M B, Lounici S. Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84(10)1849–??
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrl S, Nivbrant B, Mingguo L, Hewitt B. In vivo wear and migration of highly cross-linked polyethylene cups a radiostereometry analysis study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(4)409–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried T P, Callaghan J J. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999; 81: 115–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiehl J B. World experience with low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty a literature review. Orthopedics 2002; 25(2)213–7
   Google Scholar
• Sychterz C J, Moon K H, Hashimoto Y, Terefenko K M, Engh C A, Bauer T W. Wear of polyethylene cups in total hip arthroplasty. A study of specimens retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78(8)1193–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams I R, Mayor M B, Collier J P. The impact of sterilization method on wear in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998, 356: 170–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar