References
- Blum J, Rommens P M, Janzing H, Langendorff H S. Retrograde nailing of humerus shaft fractures with the unreamed humerus nail. An international multicenter study. Unfallchirurg 1998; 101: 342–52
- Blum J, Machemer H, Hogner M, Baumgart F, Schlegel U, Wahl D, Rommens P M. Biomechanics of interlocked nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of 2 nail systems and the effect of interfragmentary compression with the unreamed humeral nail. Unfallchirurg 2000; 103: 183–90
- Dalton J E, Salkeld S L, Satterwhite Y E, Cook S D. A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nailing systems for the humerus. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 7: 367–74
- Delling G. Age-dependent bone changes (author’s transl). Klin Wochenschr 1974; 52: 318–25
- Delling G, Amling M. Biomechanical stability of the skeleton--it is not only bone mass, but also bone structure that counts. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995; 10: 601–6
- Duda G N, Kirchner H, Wilke H.-J, Claes L. A method to determine the 3-D stiffness of fracture fixation devices and its application to predict inter-fragmentary movement. J Biomech 1998; 31: 247–52
- Duda G N, Kassi J P, Hoffmann J E, Riedt R, Khodadadyan C, Raschke M. Mechanical behavior of Ilizarov ring fixators. Effect of frame parameters on stiffness and consequences for clinical use. Unfallchirurg 2000; 103: 839–45
- Henley M B, Monroe M, Tencer A F. Biomechanical comparison of methods of fixation of a midshaft osteotomy of the humerus. J Orthop Trauma 1991; 5: 14–20
- Hepp P, Lill H, Bail H, Korner J, Niederhagen M, Haas N P, Josten C, Duda G N. Where should implants be anchored in the humeral headfi Clin Orthop. 2003, 415: 139–47
- Hessmann M H, Rommens P M. Osteosynthesis techniques in proximal humeral fractures. Chirurg 2001; 72: 1235–45
- Lill H, Josten C. Conservative or operative treatment of humeral head fractures in the elderlyfi. Chirurg 2001; 72: 1224–34
- Lill H, Hepp P, Gowin W, Oestmann J W, Korner J, Haas N P, Josten C, Duda G N. Age-and gender-related distribution of bone mineral density and mechanical properties of the proximal humerus. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1544–50
- Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi J P, Verheyden A P, Josten C, Duda G N. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant befi A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123: 74–81
- Lyons F A, Rockwood C A, Jr. Migration of pins used in operations on the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72: 1262–7
- Rajesh M, Manning P, Neumann L, Parry M, Wallace W. The effect of bone quality on intra-medullary fixation of the proximal humerus using a retrograde nail. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 45
- Resch H, Hubner C, Schwaiger R. Minimally invasive reduction and osteosynthesis of articular fractures of the humeral head. Injury 2001; 32: SA25–32
- Ruch D, Glisson R, Marr A, Russell G, Nunley J. Fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures: a bio-mechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14: 36–40
- Schindele S, Hackenbruch W, Sutter F, Schaerer M, Leutenegger A. Migration von Kirschner-Drähten nach operativer Stabilisierung von Verletzungen im Bereich der Schulter - Vier Fallberichte. Swiss Surg 1999; 5: 281–5
- Sehr J R, Szabo R M. Semitubular blade plate for fixation in the proximal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 1988; 2: 327–32
- Weinstein D, Gomez M, Hawkins R. Biomechanical comparison of tension-band wiring versus plating in the fixation of three-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Orthop Trans 1994; 18: 3
- Wheeler D L, Colville M R. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary and percutaneous pin fixation for proxi mal humeral fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 363–7