1,231
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original paper

Good results with an uncemented proximally HA-coated stem in hip revision surgery: 62 hips followed for 2–13 years

, , , &
Pages 184-193 | Received 18 Mar 2007, Accepted 02 Sep 2007, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

  • Berry D J, Harmsen W S, Ilstrup D, Lewallen D G, Cabanela M E. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop 1995, 319: 168–77
  • Berry D J. Cemented femoral revision. In: Hip surgery: materials and developments, L Sedel, M E Cabanela. Martin Duniz, London 1998; 287
  • Bodén H, Salemyr M, Sköldenberg O, Ahl T, Adolphson P. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented hydroxyapa-tite-coated tapered titanium stem. Excellent results at a minimum of 10-years follow-up in 104 hips. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11(2)175–9
  • Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem. Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83(7)1023–31
  • Brooker A F, Bowerman J W, Robinson R A, Riley L H, Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1973; 55(8)1629–32
  • Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54(1)61–76
  • Crawford C H, Malkani A L, Incavo S I, Morris H B, Krupp R J, Baker D. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(1)8–13
  • Dohmae Y D, Bechtold J E, Sherman R E, Puno R M, Gustilo R B. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988, 236: 214–20
  • Eisler T, Svensson O, Iyer V, Wejkner B, Schmalholz A, Larsson H, Elmstedt E. Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(8)974–81
  • Eldridge J D, Smith E J, Hubble M J, Whitehouse S L, Learmonth I D. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12(5)535–40
  • Emerson R H, Jr, Head W C, Higgins L L. Clinical and radio-graphic analysis of the Mallory-Head femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum 8.8-year and average eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85(10)1921–6
  • Engelbrecht E, Siegel A. Endo-Klinik klassifikation. Radio-loge 1989; 29(10)508–18
  • Engh C A, Bobyn J D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988, 231: 7–28
  • Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Glassman A H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(1)45–55
  • Engh C A, Massin P, Suthers K E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990, 257: 107–28
  • Engh C A, Jr, McAuley J P, Sychterz C J, Sacco M E, Engh C A, Sr. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A post-mortem analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82(10)1414–20
  • Furlong R J, Osborn J R. Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73(5)741–5
  • Geesink R G, de Groot K, Klein C P. Chemical implant fixation using hydroxyl-apatite coatings. The development of a human total hip prosthesis for chemical fixation to bone using hydroxyl-apatite coatings on titanium substrates. Clin Orthop 1987, 225: 147–70
  • Gie G A, Linder L, Ling R S, Simon J P, Slooff T J, Tim-perley A J. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75(1)14–21
  • Gustilo R B, Pasternak H S. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop 1988, 235: 111–9
  • Halliday B R, English H W, Timperley A J, Gie G A, Ling R S. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; 85(6)809–17
  • Haydon C M, Mehin R, Burnett S, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, McCalden R W, MacDonald S J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(6)1179–85
  • Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 1990, 261: 27–38
  • Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 2000; 24(3)139–42
  • Kelly S J, Incavo S J, Beynnon B. The use of a hydroxyapa-tite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(1)64–71
  • Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67(6)541–4
  • Lawrence J M, Engh C A, Macalino G E, Lauro G R. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76(7)965–73
  • Mahoney C R, Fehringer E V, Kopjar B, Garvin K L. Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem. Clin Orthop 2005, 432: 181–7
  • Malchau H, Kärrholm J, Wang Y X, Herberts P. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66(5)418–24
  • Malkani A L, Lewallen D G, Cabanela M E, Wallrichs S L. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(4)411–8
  • Moreland J R, Moreno M A. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop 2001, 393: 194–201
  • Mulliken B D, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop 1996, 325: 156–62
  • Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzén H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M. Early complications after one hundred and fourty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84(8)1323–8
  • Paprosky W G, Greidanus N V, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999, 369: 230–42
  • Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepistö J, Ylikoski M, Ylinen P, Paavilainen T. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82(1)103–7
  • Peters C L, Riviero D P, Kull L R, Jacobs J J, Rosenberg A G, Galante J O. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77(8)1217–26
  • Rahbek O, Kold S, Bendix K, Overgaard S, Søballe K. Superior sealing effect of hydroxyapatite in porous-coated implants: experimental studies on the migration of polyethylene particles around stable and unstable implants in dogs. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(3)375–85
  • Raman R, Kamath R P, Parikh A, Angus P D. Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87(8)1061–7
  • Reikerås O, Gunderson R B. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10-16 years. Acta Orthop 2006; 77(1)98–103
  • Rosenberg A. Cementless total hip arthroplasty: femoral remodeling and clinical experience. Orthopaedics 1989; 12(9)1223–33
  • Suominen S, Santavirta S. Revision total hip replacement using the bias proximal porous-coated femoral component. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1996; 85(4)347–51
  • Trikha S P, Singh S, Raynham O W, Lewis J C, Mitchell P A, Edge A J. Hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral stems in revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87(8)1055–60
  • Turner T M, Sumner D R, Urban R M, Rivero D P, Galante J O. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68(9)1396–409
  • Ullmark G, Hallin G, Nilsson O. Impacted corticocancellous allografts and cement for revision of the femur component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(2)140–9
  • van Biezen F C, ten Have B L, Verhaar J A. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery. 21 hips followed for 41-85 months. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(2)135–42
  • Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopäde 1987; 16(4)295–300

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.