- Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically difference of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF‐36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45(4)384–91
- Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF‐36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11)1025–36
- Apolone G, Mosconi P, Ware J E, Jr. Questionario sullo stato di salute SF‐36. Guerini e Associati. MilanItaly 1997
- Bach B R, Warren R F, Flynn W M, Kroll M, Wickiewiecz T L. Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(9)1299–306
- Beaton D E, Schemitsch E. Measures of health‐related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop 2003, 413: 90–105
- Brozek J L, Guyatt G H, Schunemann H J. How a well‐grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 69
- Dunbar M J, Robertsson O, Ryd L. What's all that noise? The effect of co‐morbidity on health outcome questionnaire results after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(2)119–26
- European Commission Directorate‐General for Education and Culture. Europe: beyond gender. The Magazine 2005; Issue 25. url: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/educa‐tion_culture/index_en.html
- Hacker S A. Chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries. In: The adult knee, J J Callaghan, A G Rosenberg, H E Rubash, P T Simonian, T L Wickiewicz. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2003; 717–32, 47
- Hays R D, Morales LS. The RAND‐36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med 2001; 33(5)350–7
- Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob R P, Staubli H U. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1993; 1(3-4)226–34
- Hjermstad M J, Fayers P M, Bjordal K, Kaasa S. Using reference data on quality of life. The importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ C‐30 (+3). Eur J Cancer 1998; 34(9)1381–9
- Johnson D S, Smith R B. Outcome measurement in ACL deficient knee. What's the score?. Knee 2001; 8(1)51–7
- Marx R G, Jones E C, Angel M, Wickiewicz T L, Warren R F. Beliefs and attitudes of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy 2003; 19(7)762–70
- McAllister D R, Motamedi A R, Hame S L, Shapiro M S, Dorey F J. Quality of life assessment in elite collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29(6)806–10
- McAllister D R, Tsai A M, Dragoo J L, McWilliams J, Dorey F J, Hame S L, Finerman G A. Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31(4)560–3
- Roos E M. Outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - a comparison of patients’ and surgeons’ assessments. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001; 11(5)287–91
- Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang M H, Fossel A H, Katz J N. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49(2)156–63
- Shapiro E T, Richmond J C, Rockett S E, McGrath M M, Donaldson W R. The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF‐36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24(2)196–200
- Walters S J, Brazier J E. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF‐6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1)4
- Ware J E, Jr., Snow K K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. The SF‐36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute New England Medical Centre. Boston, MA:USA 1993
- Ware J E, Jr., Kosinski M, Bayliss M S, McHorney C A, Rogers W H, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF‐36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care (4 Suppl) 1995; 33: AS264–79
- Ware J E, Jr., Bjorner J B, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care (Suppl 9) 2000; 38: II73–82
- Zanoli G. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery. Acta Orthop (Suppl 318) 2005; 76: 5–47
Acta Orthopaedica
Volume 79, 2008 - Issue 4