Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 92, 2021 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
1,407
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Properties of SF-6D when longitudinal data from 16,398 spine surgery procedures is applied to 9 national SF-6D value sets

Anders Joelsona Department of Orthopedics, Orebro University School of Medical Sciences and Orebro University Hospital, Orebro; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Freyr Gauti Sigmundssona Department of Orthopedics, Orebro University School of Medical Sciences and Orebro University Hospital, Orebro;
&
Jan Karlssonb University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
Pages 532-537 | Published online: 23 Apr 2021

  • Abellan Perpinan J M, Sanchez Martinez F I, Martinez Perez J E, Méndez I. Lowering the ‘floor’ of the SF-6D scoring algorithm using a lottery equivalent method. Health Econ 2012; 21(11): 1271–85.
  • Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Angst J. The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 82: 128–36.
  • Brazier J E, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004; 42(9): 851–9.
  • Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1115–28.
  • Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21(2): 271–92.
  • Brazier J E, Fukuhara S, Roberts J, Kharroubi S, Yamamoto Y, Ikeda S, Doherty J, Kurokawa K. Estimating a preference-based index from the Japanese SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62(12): 1323–31.
  • Brazier J E, Mulhern B J, Bjorner J B, Gandek B, Rowen D, Alonso J, Vilagut G, Ware J E, SF-6Dv2 International Project Group. Developing a new version of the SF-6D health state classification system from the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2. Med Care 2020; 58(6): 557–65.
  • Carreon L Y, Berven S H, Djurasovic M, Bratcher K R, Glassman S D. The discriminative properties of the SF-6D compared with the SF-36 and ODI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38(1): 60–4.
  • Craig B M, Pickard A S, Stolk E, Brazier J E. US valuation of the SF-6D. Med Decis Making 2013; 33(6): 793–803.
  • Cruz L N, Camey S A, Hoffmann J F, Rowen D, Brazier J E, Fleck M P, Polanczyk C A. Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians. Value Health 2011; 14(5 Suppl. 1): S108–S14.
  • EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199–208.
  • Fayers P M, Machin D. Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2016.
  • Ferraz M B, Nardi E P, Campolina A G. A comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D preference weights when applied to a Brazilian urban population. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 20: 21–7.
  • Ferreira L N, Ferreira P L, Pereira L N, Brazier J, Rowen D. A Portuguese value set for the SF-6D. Value Health 2010; 13(5): 624–30.
  • Jonker M F, Donkers B, de Bekker-Grob E W, Stolk E A. Advocating a paradigm shift in health-state valuations: the estimation of time-preference corrected QALY tariffs. Value Health 2018; 21(8): 993–1001.
  • Kharroubi S A, Beyh Y, Harake M D E, Dawoud D, Rowen D, Brazier J. Examining the feasibility and acceptability of valuing the Arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(3): 1037.
  • Lam C L K, Brazier J, McGhee S M. Valuation of the SF-6D health states is feasible, acceptable, reliable, and valid in a Chinese population. Value Health 2008; 11(2): 295–303.
  • McGhee S M, Brazier J, Lam C L K, Wong L C, Chau J, Cheung A, Ho A. Quality-adjusted life years: population-specific measurement of the quality component. Hong Kong Med J 2011; 17(Suppl. 6): 17–21.
  • Norman R, Viney R, Brazier J, Burgess L, Cronin P, King M, Ratcliffe J, Street D. Valuing SF-6D health states using a discrete choice experiment. Med Decis Making 2014; 34(6): 773–86.
  • Rizzo M L. Statistical computing with R. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2019.
  • Sassi F. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health Policy Plan 2006; 21(5): 402–8.
  • Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Sandén B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons. Swespine: the Swedish spine register: the 2012 report. Eur Spine J 2013; 22(4): 953–74.
  • Thygesen L C, Ersbøll A K. When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29(8): 551–8.
  • Van Dongen J M, Jornada Ben A, Finch A P, Rossenaar M M M, Biesheuvel-Leliefeld K E M, Apeldoorn A T, Ostelo R W J G, van Tulder M W, van Marwijk H W J, Bosmans J E. Assessing the impact of EQ-5D country-specific value sets on cost-utility outcomes. Med Care 2021; 59(1): 82–90.
  • Ware J E Jr, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473–83.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.