1,814
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

, , , , &

  • Afzal I, Radha S, Smoljanovi T, Stafford G H, Twyman R, Field R E. Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14(1): 318.
  • AOANJRR. AOANJRR annual report 2020. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020
  • Baker P, Cowling P, Kurtz S, Jameson S, Gregg P, Deehan D. Reason for revision influences early patient outcomes after aseptic knee revision knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(8): 2244–52.
  • Fraser J F, Spangehl M J. International rates of patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty, 2004–2014. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(1): 83–6.
  • Greidanus N V, Peterson R C, Masri B A, Garbuz D S. Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(4): 615–20.
  • Gundtoft P H, Pedersen A B, Schønheyder H C, Overgaard S. Validation of the diagnosis “prosthetic joint infection” in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(3): 320–5.
  • Harrell Jr F E. rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 6.0-0; 2020.
  • Kim G K, Mortazavi S M J, Purtill J J, Sharkey P F, Hozack W J, Parvizi J. Stiffness after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(6): 844–50.
  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 780–5.
  • Kurtz S M, Lau E C, Son M-S, Chang E T, Zimmerli W, Parvizi J. Are we winning or losing the battle with periprosthetic joint infection: trends in periprosthetic joint infection and mortality risk for the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(10): 3238–45.
  • Leta T H, Lygre S H L, Skredderstuen A, Hallan G, Furnes O. Failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties: 145 revision failures from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1994–2011. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 48–57.
  • Leta T H, Lygre S H L, Schrama J C, Hallan G, Gjertsen J E, Dale H, Furnes O. Outcome of revision surgery for infection after total knee arthroplasty: results of 3 surgical strategies. JBJS Rev 2019; 7(6): 1–10.
  • LROI. LROI rapportage; 2019. https://www.lroi-report.nl/
  • Luttjeboer J S, Bénard M R, Defoort K C, van Hellemondt G G, Wymenga A B. Revision total knee arthroplasty for instability: outcome for different types of instability and implants. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(12): 2672–6.
  • Malviya A, Brewster N T, Bettinson K, Holland J P, Weir D J, Deehan D J. Functional outcome following aseptic single-stage revision knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20(10): 1994–2001.
  • Mortazavi J S M, Molligan J, Austin M S, Purtill J J, Hozack W J, Parvizi J. Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 2011; 35(8): 1157–64.
  • National Joint Registry. 17th Annual Report for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Bristol: NJR; 2020. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/
  • Nichols C I, Vose J G. Clinical outcomes and costs within 90 days of primary or revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(7): 1400–1406.e3.
  • Park M, Kim S, Chung C, Choi I, Lee S, Lee K. Statistical consideration for bilateral cases in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(8): 1732–7.
  • Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota R E, Toms A D. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(8): 1076–81.
  • Pun S Y, Ries M D. Effect of gender and preoperative diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 446(11): 2701–5.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 1–4.
  • Sheng P-Y, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jämsen E, Nevalainen J, Pajamäki J, Halonen P, Konttinen Y T. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(7): 1425–30.
  • Teel A J, Esposito J G, Lanting B A, Howard J L, Schemitsch E H. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(12): 3124–32.
  • Therneau T. A package for survival analysis in R. R package version 3.2-7; 2020.
  • Van Kempen R W T M, Schimmel J J P, Van Hellemondt G G, Vandenneucker H, Wymenga A B. Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(7): 2296–302.