1,545
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The rise of registry-based research: a bibliometric analysis

, , , , , & show all

  • Boyer P, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19(7): 858–63.
  • Campbell A J, Bagley A, Van Heest A, James M A. Challenges of randomized controlled surgical trials. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41(2): 145–55.
  • Castillo R C, Scharfstein D O, MacKenzie E J. Observational studies in the era of randomized trials: finding the balance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94(Suppl. 1): 112–7.
  • Hailer N P. Orthopedic registry research: limitations and future perspectives. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 1–2.
  • Havelin L I, Fenstad A M, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B, Herberts P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(4): 393–401.
  • Heckmann N, Ihn H, Stefl M, Etkin C D, Springer B D, Berry D J, Lieberman J R. Early results from the American Joint Replacement Registry: a comparison with other national registries. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(7): S125–S34.
  • Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(2): 111–21.
  • Hughes R E, Batra A, Hallstrom B R. Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk data. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10(2): 240–52.
  • Keurentjes J C, Pijls B G, Van Tol F R, Mentink J F, Mes S D, Schoones J W, Fiocco M, Sedrakyan A, Nelissen R G. Which implant should we use for primary total hip replacement?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(Suppl. 1): 79–97.
  • Lobo S, Zargaran D, Zargaran A. The 50 most cited articles in ankle surgery. Orthop Rev 2020; 12(4).
  • Lübbeke A, Carr A J, Hoffmeyer P. Registry stakeholders. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4(6): 330–6.
  • Malchau H, Garellick G, Berry D, Harris W H, Robertson O, Kärrlholm J, Lewallen D, Bragdon C R, Lidgren L, Herberts P. Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: development, current, and future impact. J Orthop Res 2018; 36(9): 2319–30.
  • Morshed S, Tornetta III P, Bhandari M. Analysis of observational studies: a guide to understanding statistical methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(Suppl. 3): 50–60.
  • Mundi R, Chaudhry H, Mundi S, Godin K, Bhandari M. Design and execution of clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery. Bone Joint Res 2014; 3(5): 161–8.
  • Nelissen R G, Pijls B G, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuijse M J, Valstar E R. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(Suppl. 3): 62–5.
  • Nieuwenhuijse M J, Nelissen R G H H, Schoones J W, Sedrakyan A. Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologies. BMJ 2014; 349(Sep 9): g5133.
  • Paxton E W, Mohaddes M, Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Graves S E, Malchau H, Namba R S, Kärrholm J, Rolfson O, Cafri G. Meta-analysis of individual registry results enhances international registry collaboration. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(4): 369–73.
  • Pijls B G, Meessen J M, Tucker K, Stea S, Steenbergen L, Marie Fenstad A, Mäkelä K, Cristian Stoica I, Goncharov M, Overgaard S. MoM total hip replacements in Europe: a NORE report. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4(6): 423–9.
  • Ranstam J, Kärrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Mäkelä K, Espehaug B, Pedersen A B, Mehnert F, Furnes O, for the NARA study group. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data, I: Introduction and background. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(3): 253–7.
  • Robertsson O, Bizjajeva S, Fenstad A M, Furnes O, Lidgren L, Mehnert F, Odgaard A, Pedersen A B, Havelin L I. Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: a pilot study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1): 82–9.
  • Sedrakyan A, Paxton E W, Phillips C, Namba R, Funahashi T, Barber T, Sculco T, Padgett D, Wright T, Marinac-Dabic D. The international consortium of orthopaedic registries: overview and summary. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(Suppl. 3): 1–12.
  • Van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A, Spooren A, Van Rooden S M, Van Oosterhout F J, Morrenhof J W, Nelissen R G. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register: external validation of 311,890 procedures. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 498–505.
  • Van Steenbergen L N, Mäkelä K T, Kärrholm J, Rolfson O, Overgaard S, Furnes O, Pedersen A B, Eskelinen A, Hallan G, Schreurs B W. Total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA): comparison of patient and procedure characteristics in 475,685 cases. Acta Orthop 2021; 92(1): 15–22.
  • Varnum C, Pedersen A B, Rolfson O, Rogmark C, Furnes O, Hallan G, Mäkelä K, de Steiger R, Porter M, Overgaard S. Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4(6): 368–76.
  • Yakkanti R, Greif D N, Wilhelm J, Allegra P R, Yakkanti R, Hernandez V H. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis of the 50 most commonly cited studies. Arthroplasty Today. 2020; 6(4): 931–40.
  • Zanoli G. The Cochrane Collaboration on arthroplasty reviews and the role of evidence coming from registries: a difficult but necessary way forward. 1st ISAR Congress, Bergen, Norway, May 20-22; 2012.