Crooked Hillary and Sleepy Joe: name-calling’s backfire effect on candidate evaluations

References

• Axelrod, T. 2019. “GOP Senator Defends Calling Pelosi ‘Dumb’: ‘what I Said was Accurate.” The Hill, November, 8. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/469716-gop-senator-defends-calling-pelosi-dumb-what-i-said-was-accurate/.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, N. M. 2017. “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology 38: 279–295. doi:10.1111/pops.12351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, R., and S. Freeder. 2020. “The More You Know: Voter Heuristics and the Information Search.” Political Behavior 42: 603–623. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9512-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branham, J. A. 2018. “Partisan Feedback: Heterogeneity in Opinion Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82: 625–640. doi:10.1093/poq/nfy040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branton, R., A. English, S. Pettey, and T. D. Barnes. 2018. “The Impact of Gender and Quality Opposition on the Relative Assessment of Candidate Competency.” Electoral Studies 54: 35–43. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. 2019. “Donald Trump is Behaving ‘Like an 11-Year-Old’ by Name-Calling, Says London Mayor.” Newsweek, June 4. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-behaving-like-11-year-old-name-calling-says-london-mayor-1442037.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J. 2010. “A Negativity Gap? Voter Gender, Attack Politics, and Participation in American Elections.” Politics & Gender 6: 319–341. doi:10.1017/S1743923X10000218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., and J. G. Geer. 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter: Unabridged Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M., M. J. Riedl, J. L. Shermak, J. Brown, and O. Tenenboim. 2019. “Breakdown of Democratic Norms? Understanding the 2016 US Presidential Election Through Online Comments.” Social Media + Society 5: 205630511984363–13. doi:10.1177/2056305119843637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, R. L., and M. J. Ensley. 2016. “Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans: Mine is a Likable Rogue, Yours is a Degenerate Criminal.” Political Behavior 38: 317–335. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9313-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. J., B. S. Liu, B. O. Winegard, and P. H. Ditto. 2019. Tribalism is Human Nature.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 28: 587–592. doi:10.1177/0963721419862289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., and D. Park-Ozee. 2020. “Uncivil Name-Calling in the U.S. Presidency, 1933–2018.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 50: 264–285. doi:10.1111/psq.12619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, S., and R. Cowan. 2019. “House Speaker Pelosi Calls Trump a ‘Coward,’ Tells Reporter: ‘Don’t Mess with Me.’” U.S. News and World Reports, December 5. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-pelosi-issues-idCAKBN1Y9257.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., and P. S. Rippere. 2016. “He Said, She Said: The Impact of Candidate Gender in Negative Campaigns.” Politics & Gender 12: 391–414. doi:10.1017/S1743923X15000550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckman, M., and E. Cassese. 2021. “Gendered Nationalism and the 2016 US Presidential Election: How Party, Class, and Beliefs About Masculinity Shaped Voting Behavior.” Politics & Gender 17: 277–300. doi:10.1017/S1743923X19000485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditonto, T. M., A. J. Hamilton, and D. P. Redlawsk. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Information Search, and Voting Behavior in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 36: 335–358. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9232-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., S. R. Gubitz, M. S. Levendusky, and A. M. Lloyd. 2019. “How Incivility on Partisan Media (De)Polarizes the Electorate.” The Journal of Politics 81: 291–295. doi:10.1086/699912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, C. 2019. “With Name-Calling and Twitter Battles, House Republican Campaign Arm Copies Trump’s Playbook.” The New York Times, July 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/17/us/politics/donald-trump-republicans.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L., M. Dolezal, and W. C. Müeller. 2017. “Gender Differences in Negative Campaigning: The Impact of Party Environments.” Politics & Gender 13: 81–106. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., and J. H. Clark. 2016. “You Tweet Like a Girl!” American Politics Research 44: 326–352. doi:10.1177/1532673X15597747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgette, R., and J. S. Morris. 2006. “High-Conflict Television News and Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 59: 447–456. doi:10.1177/106591290605900312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., M. M. Franz, and T. N. Ridout. 2016. Political Advertising in the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., and P. J. Kenney. 2008. “The Dimensions of Negative Messages.” American Politics Research 36: 694–723. doi:10.1177/1532673X08316448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., and P. J. Kenney. 2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 307–325. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C. 2016. “Watch Donald Trump Misspell ‘Lyin.” The Week, March 5.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. 2006. Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. 2014. “Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the Use of Incivility in Political Expression.” Political Communication 31: 564–583. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.852640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. 2017. “More Than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29: 384–405. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edw010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. 2019. “Rousing the Partisan Combatant: Elite Incivility, Anger, and Antideliberative Attitudes.” Political Psychology 40: 637–655. doi:10.1111/pops.12532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goovaerts, I., and S. Marien. 2020. “Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power?.” Political Communication 37: 768–788. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1753868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubitz, S. R., S. Klar, J. Robinson, and J. N. Druckman. 2018. “Political Dynamics of Framing.” In New Directions in Media and Politics 2nd Edition, edited by T. N. Ridout, 29–53. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M., J. L. Merolla, and E. Zechmeister. 2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 69: 134–147. doi:10.1177/1065912915624018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Tyler. 2021. “Sleepy Joe? Recalling and Considering Donald Trump’s Strategic Use of Nicknames.” Journal of Political Marketing 20: 302–316. doi:10.1080/15377857.2021.1939572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., K. Coe, and S. A. Rains. 2020. “Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors.” Communication Research 47: 795–814. doi:10.1177/0093650217699933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and Y. Kim. 2019. “Incivility on Facebook and Political Polarization: The Mediating Role of Seeking Further Comments and Negative Emotion.” Computers in Human Behavior 99: 219–227. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., and N. M. Bauer. 2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36: 167–188. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9221-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., H. Liang, and G. K. Y. Tang. 2019. “Online Incivility, Cyberbalkanization, and the Dynamics of Opinion Polarization during and After Mass Protests Events.” International Journal of Communication 13: 4940–4959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., H. Norpoth, W. G. Jacoby, and H. F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, J. K. 2019. “Voter Reasoning Bias When Evaluating Statements from Female and Male Political Candidates.” Politics & Gender 15: 310–335. doi:10.1017/S1743923X18000302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisel, L. S. 2012. “The Negative Consequences of Uncivil Political Discourse.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45: 405–411. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 2016. “A Cross-Cutting Calm.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80: 351–377. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., C. Davis, D. Coppini, Y. M. Kim, S. Knisely, and D. McLeod. 2015. “When Women Attack.” Politics and the Life Sciences 34: 44–56. doi:10.1017/pls.2015.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrin, G., K. de la Haye, D. L. Espelage, B. Ewing, J. S. Tucker, M. Hoover, and H. D. Green. 2018. “The Co-Evolution of Bullying Perpetration, Homophobic Teasing, and a School Friendship Network.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 47: 601–618. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0783-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mölders, C., and N. Van Quaquebeke. 2017. “When and How Politicians’ Disrespect Affects Voters’ Trust in the Political System: The Roles of Social Judgments and Category Prototypicality.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 47: 515–527. doi:10.1111/jasp.12458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A. 2017. “Personal and Public Levels of Political Incivility.” International Journal of Communication 11: 3182–3202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. 2015. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., and B. Reeves. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99: 1–15. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nai, A., and F. Martinez i Coma. 2019. “Losing in the Polls, Time Pressure, and the Decision to Go Negative in Referendum Campaigns.” Politics and Governance 7: 278–296. doi:10.17645/pag.v7i2.1940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A. 2019. “New Book Details Trump’s Topsy-Turvey Relationship with Congress.” Washington Post, April 3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-book-details-trumps-topsy-turvy-relationship-with-congress/2019/04/03/fe0725b0-54a8-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html.
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, S. 2019. “Democratic Rivals Take Swipes at Biden After His Entry Into Race for 2020 Nomination.” Delaware Online: Part of the USA Today Network. April 27. https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/27/2020-campaign-democrat-rivals-take-aim-biden/3598701002/.
   Google Scholar
• Popan, J. R., L. Coursey, J. Acosta, and J. Kenworthy. 2019. “Testing the Effects of Incivility during Internet Political Discussion on Perceptions of Rational Argument and Evaluations of a Political Outgroup.” Computers in Human Behavior 96: 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., K. Kenski, K. Coe, and J. Harwood. 2017. “Incivility and Political Identity on the Internet: Intergroup Factors as Predictors of Incivility in Discussions of News Online.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22: 163–178. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaran, J. A., J. Kornelis Dijkstra, and R. Veenstra. 2019. “Bullying as a Group Process in Childhood: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis.” Child Development Early Access, doi: 10.1111/cdev.13298.
   Google Scholar
• Rheault, L., E. Rayment, and A. Musulan. 2019. Politicians in the Line of Fire: Incivility and the Treatment of Women on Social Media.” Research and Politics 6: 1–7. doi:10.1177/2F2053168018816228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, J. B., and P. H. Ditto. 2020. “Comparing the Effects of a News Article’s Message and Source on Fracking Attitudes in an Experimental Study.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 10: 255–269. doi:10.1007/s13412-020-00602-z.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Z. K., L. A. Keefer, and J. Hauri. 2021. “Defensive Partisanship? Evidence That In-Party Scandals Increase Out-Party Hostility.” Political Psychology 42: 3–21. doi:10.1111/pops.12680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, D., and A. Sproveri. 2012. “The Rise and Fall of Nasty Politics in America.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (3): 416–421. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaperdas, S., and B. Grofman. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89: 49–61. doi:10.2307/2083074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S., and J. M. Berry. 2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication 28: 19–41. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.542360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, D., J. Sullivan, B. Allen, and D. Alger. 2008. “What’s Good for the Goose is Bad for the Gander: Negative Political Advertising, Partisanship, and Turnout.” The Journal of Politics 70: 527–541. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, J. C., and M. R. Wolf. 2012. “Political Civility.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45: 401–404. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swire-Thompson, B., U. K. H. Ecker, S. Lewandowsky, and A. J. Berinsky. 2020. “They Might Be a Liar But They’re My Liar: Source Evaluation and the Prevalence of Misinformation.” Political Psychology 41: 21–34. doi:10.1111/pops.12586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydnor, E. 2019. Disrespectful Democracy: The Psychology of Political Incivility. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., C. Panagopoulos, and J. Roozenbeek. 2020. “You are Fake News: Political Bias in Perceptions of Fake News.” Media, Culture & Society 42: 460–470. doi:10.1177/0163443720906992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’t Riet, J., G. Schaap, M. Kleemans, H. Veling, and S. Lecheler. 2019. “On Different Sides: Investigating the Persuasive Effects of Anger Expression in Political News Messages.” Political Psychology 40: 837–857. doi:10.1111/pops.12554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulsdonk, Iris, Alessandro Nai, and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2022. “Are Political Attacks a Laughing Matter? Three Experiments on Political Humor and the Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning.” Political Research Quarterly, First Published Online, doi:10.1177/10659129211023590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K. 2017. “Which Candidates Can Be Mavericks? The Effects of Issue Disagreement and Gender on Candidate Evaluations.” Politics & Policy 45: 4–30. doi:10.1111/polp.12192.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., W. van der Brug, and P. van Praag. 2014. “When the Stakes are High: Party Competition and Negative Campaigning.” Comparative Studies 47: 550–573. doi:10.1177/2F0010414013488543.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. R., J. C. Strachan, and D. M. Shea. 2012. “Incivility and Standing Firm: A Second Layer of Partisan Division.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45: 428–434. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar