Measuring public preferences for government spending under constraints: a conjoint-analytic approach

References

• Ballard-Rosa, C., L. Martin, and K. Scheve. 2017. “The Structure of American Income tax Policy Preferences.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1086/687324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, K., M. M. Bechtel, and Y. Margalit. 2021. “Why Austerity? The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy.” American Political Science Review 115 (2): 486–505. doi:10.1017/S0003055420001136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2015. “The Social Welfare Deficit: Public Opinion, Policy Responsiveness, and Political Inequality in Affluent Democracies.” Unpublished manuscript. Accessed June 3, 2019. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Bartels2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bonica, A. 2015. “Measuring Public Spending Preferences Using an Interactive Budgeting Questionnaire.” Research & Politics 2 (2): 1–9. doi:10.1177/2053168015586471.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, B., and R. Burgisser. 2022a. “Do Citizens Care About Government Debt? Evidence from Survey Experiments on Budgetary Priorities.” European Journal of Political Research, Online First. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, B., and R. Burgisser. 2022b. “Public Opinion on Welfare State Recalibration in Times of Austerity: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” Political Science Research and Methods, 1–19. doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., and J. L. Garritzmann. 2017. “Public Opinion on Policy and Budgetary Trade-offs in European Welfare States: Evidence from a New Comparative Survey.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (6): 871–889. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. R., J. L. Garritzmann, E. Neimanns, and R. Nezi. 2018. “Investing in Education in Europe: Evidence from a New Survey of Public Opinion.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (1): 34–54. doi:10.1177/0958928717700562.
   Google Scholar
• Eichenberg, R. C., and R. Stoll. 2003. “Representing Defense: Democratic Control of the Defense Budget in the United States and Western Europe.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (4): 399–422. doi:10.1177/0022002703254477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eismeier, T. J. 1982. “Public Preferences About Government Spending: Partisan, Social, and Attitudinal Sources of Policy Differences.” Political Behavior 4 (2): 133–145. doi:10.1007/BF00987185.
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, J., and B. Ansell. 2012. “Preferences in Context: Micro Preferences, Macro Contexts, and the Demand for Social Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1624–1654. doi:10.1177/0010414012463904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., F. J. Fowler Jr., M. P. Couper, J. M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2011. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., D. J. Hopkins, and T. Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. M. 1998. “Individuals, Institutions, and Public Preferences Over Public Finance.” American Political Science Review 92 (3): 513–531. doi:10.2307/2585478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausermann, S., T. Kurer, and D. Traber. 2019. “The Politics of Trade-Offs: Studying the Dynamics of Welfare State Reform with Conjoint Experiments.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (7): 1059–1095. doi:10.1177/0010414018797943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. 1994. “Public Attitudes Toward Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 336–361. doi:10.2307/2111407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., F. R. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, C. Wlezien, S. Soroka, M. Foucault, A. François, et al. 2009. “A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 855–873. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00405.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., and S. Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by P. V. Marsden, and J. D. Wright, 263–314. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, A. 1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 6–28. Doi: 0033-362X/98/6201-0001$02.50. doi:10.1086/297828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, H., and A. Bergström. 2016. Swedish Trends 1986–2015, Report 2016–28. SOM Institute Gothenburg. Accessed April 21, 2020. https://som.gu.se/digitalAssets/1593/1593632_swedish-trends-1986-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E. 2012. “Beyond Comprehension: The Role of Numeracy in Judgments and Decisions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (1): 31–35. doi:10.1177/0963721411429960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm, P. 2011. “Social Policy by Popular Demand.” World Politics 63 (2): 271–299. doi:10.1017/S0043887111000037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, T. J., and J. Evans. 2005. “Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 660–671. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00148.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., and C. Wlezien. 2010. Degrees of Democracy. Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuxhorn, K. L., J. D'Attoma, and S. Steinmo. 2021. “Do Citizens Want Something for Nothing? Mass Attitudes and the Federal Budget.” Politics & Policy 49 (3): 566–593. doi:10.1111/polp.12406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000. doi:10.2307/2111666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. 2017. “Public Opinion and Policy Representation: On Conceptualization, Measurement, and Interpretation.” Policy Studies Journal 45 (4): 561–582. doi:10.1111/psj.12190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar