Perceptual and positional saliencies influence children’s sequence learning differently with age and instructions at test

References

• Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183–193. doi: 10.1037/h0054663
   Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 371–389. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000307
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, I. J., Howard, J. H. Jr., & Howard, D. V. (2007). Age-related differences in implicit learning of subtle third-order sequential structure. Journals of Gerontology, 62B, 98–103. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.P98
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science, 17, 905–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Seeing and hearing in space and time: Effects of modality and presentation rate on implicit statistical learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 561–580. doi: 10.1080/09541440802097951
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2000). Processing limits of selective attention and working memory: Potential implications for interpreting. Interpreting, 5, 117–146. doi: 10.1075/intp.5.2.05cow
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., Morey, C. C., AuBuchon, A. M., Zwilling, C. E., & Gilchrist, A. L. (2010). Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded. Developmental Science, 13, 120–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00864.x
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D. E., & Berry, D. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 875–887.
   Google Scholar
• Dulany, D. E., Carlston, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541–555. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.541
   Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, Y. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105, 577–614. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J., & Mehler, J. (2005). The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 406–419. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.406
   Google Scholar
• Fiser, Y., & Aslin, R. A. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499–504. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00392
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1993). Recognising and remembering. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 163–188). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. (1998). The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(1), 3–27. doi: 10.1017/S0021963097001753
   Google Scholar
• Gobet, F., & Clarkson, G. (2004). Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two? Memory, 12, 732–747. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000530
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70(2), 109–135. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A. (2005). When obvious covariations are not even learned implicitly. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 449–480. doi: 10.1080/09541440440000203
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. H. Jr., & Howard, D. V. (1997). Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. Psychology and Aging, 12, 634–656. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.634
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, A. T., & Reber, A. (1998). The role of attention in implicit sequence learning: Exploring the limits of the cognitive unconscious. In M. Stadler, & P. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 471–494). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236–259.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. P., Fernandes, K. J., Frank, M. C., Kirkham, N. Z., Marcus, G. F., Rabagliati, H., & Slemmer, J. A. (2009). Abstract rule learning for visual sequences in 8- and 11-month-olds. Infancy, 14(1), 2–18. doi: 10.1080/15250000802569611
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. (2012). Why chunking should be considered as an explanation for developmental change before short-term memory capacity and processing speed. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00167.
   Google Scholar
• Kail, R. (1988). Developmental functions for speeds of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 339–364. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90036-7
   Google Scholar
• Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during child-hood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.490
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J., & Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 551–565. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2010). Attention highlighting in learning: A canonical experiment. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 153–185). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larrauri, J. A., & Schmajuk, N. A. (2008). Attentional, associative, and configural mechanisms in extinction. Psychological Review, 115(3), 640–676. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.640
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. doi: 10.1037/h0076778
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., Vijayan, S., Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5398.77
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, Y. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of Implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083–1100.
   Google Scholar
• Meulemans, T. (1998). Apprentissage implicite: une approche cognitive, neuropsychologique et développementale [Implicit learning: A cognitive, neuropsychological and developmental approach]. Marseille, France: Solal.
   Google Scholar
• Meulemans, T., & Van der Linden, M. (1997). Does the artificial grammar learning involve the acquisition of complex information? Psychologica Belgica, 37, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Meulemans, T., Van der Linden, M., & Perruchet, P. (1998). Implicit sequence learning in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 199–221. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2442
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., & Rowson, C. (2008). The effect of repetition and similarity on sequence learning. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1509–1514. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1509
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., McKone, E., & Slee, J. (2003). Dissociations between implicit and explicit memory in children: The role of strategic processing and the knowledge base. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 124–165. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00002-X
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 411–421.
   Google Scholar
• Pacton, S., & Perruchet, P. (2008). An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 80–96.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, L. A., Peynirciolu, Z. F., & Blaxton, T. A. (1998). Developmental differences in implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 167–185. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2449
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P. (1994). Defining the knowledge units of a synthetic language: Comment on Vokey and Brooks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P. (2008). Implicit learning. In J. Byrne (Eds.), Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol.2 of learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp. 597–621). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Gallego, J. (1997). A subjective unit formation account for implicit learning. In D. Berry (Eds.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 124–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264–275. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Peereman, R. (2004). The exploitation of distributional information in syllable processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 97–119. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00059-9
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). Learning and development. The implicit knowledge assumption reconsidered. In M. Stadler & P. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 495–531). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness (target paper). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–330.
   Google Scholar
• Poletiek, F. H., & Wolters, G. (2009). What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 868–876. doi: 10.1080/17470210802511188
   Google Scholar
• Pornstein, M. H., & Krinsky, S. J. (1985). Perception of symmetry in infancy: The salience of vertical symmetry and the perception of pattern wholes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(85)90026-8
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S., & Allen, R. (1978). Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 6, 189–221. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90013-6
   Google Scholar
• Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123–138. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.123
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, L. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 643–648. doi: 10.3758/BF03193975
   Google Scholar
• Saffan, J. R., & Wilson, D. P. (2003). From syllables to syntax: Multilevel statistical learning by 12-month-old Infants. Infancy, 4, 273–284. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0402_07
   Google Scholar
• Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, Y. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.
   Google Scholar
• Soetens, E., Melis, A., & Notebaert, W. (2004). Sequence learning and sequential effects. Psychological Research, 69, 124–137. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0163-4
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, M. A. (1992). Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, D., Kiyokawa, S., Yamada, A., Dienes, Z., & Shigemasu, K. (2008). Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1154–1159. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1154
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. M., Hunt, R. H., Vizueta, N., Sommer, T., Durston, S., Yang, Y., & Worden, M. S. (2004). Evidence of developmental differences in implicit sequence learning: An fMRI study of children and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1339–1351. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304688
   Google Scholar
• Tunney, R. J. (2005). Sources of confidence judgments in implicit cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 367–373. doi: 10.3758/BF03196386
   Google Scholar
• Tunney, R. J. (2010). Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning. Experimental Psychology, 57, 160–168. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000020
   Google Scholar
• Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (1999). Isolating unconscious influences: The neutral parameter procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 857–875. doi: 10.1080/713755857
   Google Scholar
• Wenderoth, P. (1994). The salience of vertical symmetry. Perception, 23(2), 221–36. doi: 10.1068/p230221
   Google Scholar
• Witt, A., Puspitawati, I., & Vinter, A. (2013). How explicit and implicit test instructions in an implicit learning task affect performance. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e53296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053296
   Google Scholar
• Witt, A., & Vinter, A. (2011). Learning implicitly to produce avoided behaviours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental psychology, 64(6), 1173–1186. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543283
   Google Scholar
• Witt, A., & Vinter, A. (2012). Artificial grammar learning in children: Abstraction of rules or sensitivity to perceptual features? Psychological Research, 76, 97–110. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0328-5
   Google Scholar