Multiple attentional sets while monitoring rapid serial visual presentations

References

• Adamo, M., Pun, C., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2008). Your divided attention, please! The maintenance of multiple attentional control sets over distinct regions in space. Cognition, 107, 295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Adamo, M., Wozny, S., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2010). Parallel, independent attentional control settings for colors and shapes. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1730–1735. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1730
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A. (2014). On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1755–1762.
   Google Scholar
• Awh, E., & Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 834–846.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496. doi: 10.3758/BF03205306
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. W., Ravizza, S. M., & Peltier, C. (2015). An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2640–2652. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0964-8
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583–597.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, J., & Spence, I. (2013). A mixture distribution of spatial attention. Experimental Psychology, 60, 149–156. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000182
   Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., & Anderson, B. A. (2010). Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 421–426. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.421
   Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741–753. doi: 10.3758/BF03194741
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, H. J., Luck, S. J., Munte, T. F., Gos, A., Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 42–52. doi: 10.3758/BF03211689
   Google Scholar
• Irons, J. L., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2012). All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 758–775.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., & Kawahara, J. (2016). Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task. Acta Psychologica, 163, 107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Jans, B., Peters, J. C., & De Weerd, P. (2010). Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: The jury is still out. Psychological Review, 117, 637–682. doi: 10.1037/a0019082
   Google Scholar
• Jefferies, L., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2014). The flexible focus: Whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 465–470.
   Google Scholar
• Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lusting, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615
   Google Scholar
• Kawahara, J., & Yamada, Y. (2006). Two non-contiguous locations can be attended concurrently: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 594–599. doi: 10.3758/BF03193968
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement, 14. doi:10.1177/03010066070360S101.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6, 381–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00530.x
   Google Scholar
• Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set. Visual Cognition, 14, 565–583. doi: 10.1080/13506280500193438
   Google Scholar
• McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2004). Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex. Neuron, 42, 677–686. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00263-6
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. S., & Weissman, D. H. (2010). Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1495–1509. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1495
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. S., & Weissman, D. H. (2011). Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention. Visual Cognition, 19, 417–444. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2011.558862
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. S., & Weissman, D. H. (2014). A bottleneck model of set-specific capture. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088313
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 411–421.
   Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, S. E., Levinthal, B. R., & Franconeri, S. L. (2010). Complex attentional control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2297–2304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.520085
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2001). Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: Dominant role of uniqueness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 747–752. doi: 10.3758/BF03196213
   Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   Google Scholar
• Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., & Shen, J. (2001). Peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking effects on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm. Vision Research, 41, 2757–2769. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00145-6
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
   Google Scholar
• Roper, Z. J. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Searching for two things at once: Establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1114–1121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0297-8
   Google Scholar
• Scolari, M., Ester, E. F., & Serences, J. T. (2014). Feature- and object-based attentional modulation in the human visual system. In S. Kastner & K. Nobre (Eds.), Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 573–600). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trick, L. M., Enns, J. T., Mills, J., & Vavrik, J. (2004). Paying attention behind the wheel: A framework for studying the role of attention in driving. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 385–424. doi: 10.1080/14639220412331298938
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Dissociations among attention, perception, and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 14, 605–611. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1472.x
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. D., & Ward, L. M. (2008). Orienting of attention. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar