Context-specific adjustment of cognitive control: Transfer of adaptive control sets

References

• Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., Notebaert, W., & Risko, E. F. (2013). Attention modulation by proportion congruency: The asymmetrical list shifting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1552–1562. doi:10.1037/a0032426
   Google Scholar
• Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2008). Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 958–973.
   Google Scholar
• Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2011). Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 505–511.
   Google Scholar
• Atalay, N. B., & Misirlisoy, M. (2012). Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within- and between-language ISPC effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1578–1590. doi:2012-12104-001 [pii] 10.1037/a0028458
   Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article No. 367, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
   Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Chanani, S. (2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 844–859.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., & Yu, A. J. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 933–942. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
   Google Scholar
• Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology, 64(1–2), 191–209. doi:S0301051103001091
   Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 316–321. doi:10.3758/Bf03193850
   Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Contextual control over task-set retrieval. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2047–2053. doi:10.3758/APP.72.8.2047
   Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1523–1532. doi:10.1080/17470210902752096
   Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J., Vaquero, J. M., & Milliken, B. (2008). Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 22–36. doi:S1053-8100(07)00008-6[pii]10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 334–338.
   Google Scholar
• Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2003). A supramodal number representation in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 37(4), 719–726.
   Google Scholar
• Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 374–380.
   Google Scholar
• Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. Neuroimage, 35(2), 940–948.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2015). Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1482–1487. doi:10.1037/xhp0000157
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., Gottschalk, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 399–416. doi:10.1037/a00343102013-33714-001
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123(2), 303–307. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.015
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., Miller, J., & Schubert, T. (2007). Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1685–1699.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., Plessow, F., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2010). Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1576–1594. doi:10.1037/a0019326
   Google Scholar
• Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010a). Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010b). Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation. Cognition, 114(3), 338–347.
   Google Scholar
• Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goschke, T. (2014). Dysfunctions of decision-making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: advances, gaps, and needs in current research. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(S1), 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, C., & Fischer, R. (2016). Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context? Psychological Research, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0746-5
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, A., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2009). Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 966–976. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 638–644. doi:10.3758/Bf03196526
   Google Scholar
• King, J. A., Korb, F. M., & Egner, T. (2012). Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(24), 8192–8200. doi:32/24/8192 [pii]10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-12.2012
   Google Scholar
• Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15(1), 126–147. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126
   Google Scholar
• Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2008). On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 814–818. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.814
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1072–1090. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1072
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7(3), 166–174.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.16724/1/167
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. Reprinted in revised form. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106(2), 1071–1080. doi:S0010-0277(07)00118-7[pii]10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31(2), 167–193.
   Google Scholar
• Pereg, M., Shahar, N., & Meiran, N. (2013). Task switching training effects are mediated by working-memory management. Intelligence, 41(5), 467–478. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D'esposito, M., Detre, J. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002). Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(2), 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R. (2013). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 615–630.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 514–523. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Quesada, M., Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., & Funes, M. J. (2014). Proportion Congruent effects in the absence of sequential Congruent effects. Psicológica, 35(1), 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Weidler, B. J., & Bugg, J. M. (2016). Transfer of location-specific control to untrained locations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2202–2217. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1111396
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2011). Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 910–916. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0119-4
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, M., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Jacobsen, T. (2012). Conflict-induced perceptual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 675–686. doi:10.1037/a00259022011-23775-001
   Google Scholar
• Wühr, P., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2015). Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 779-801.
   Google Scholar