311
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

Inhibition in task switching: The reliability of the n − 2 repetition cost

&
Pages 2419-2433 | Received 05 Jul 2016, Accepted 13 Sep 2016, Published online: 17 Oct 2016

References

  • Bestgen, Y., & Dupont, V. (2000). Is negative priming a reliable measure for studying individual differences in inhibition? Current Psychology of Cognition, 19, 287–305.
  • Brown, L. a., Brockmole, J. R., Gow, A. J., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Processing speed and visuospatial executive function predict visual working memory ability in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 38(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2012.636722 doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.636722
  • Champely, S. (2009). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.1.1. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr
  • Chen, X., Feng, Z., Wang, T., Su, H., & Zhang, L. (2016). Internal switching and backward inhibition in depression and rumination. Psychiatry Research, 243, 342–348. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.014 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.014
  • Congdon, E., Mumford, J. a., Cohen, J. R., Galvan, A., Canli, T., & Poldrack, R. a. (2012, February). Measurement and reliability of response inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 37, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
  • Dreher, J. C., Kohn, P. D., & Berman, K. (2001). The neural basis of backward inhibition during task switching. NeuroImage, 13(6), S311–S311. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(01)91654-4
  • Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
  • Fales, C. L., Vanek, Z. F., & Knowlton, B. J. (2006). Backward inhibition in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1041–1049. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.002
  • Foti, F., Sdoia, S., Menghini, D., Mandolesi, L., Vicari, S., Ferlazzo, F., & Petrosini, L. (2015, March). Are the deficits in navigational abilities present in the Williams syndrome related to deficits in the backward inhibition? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00287 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00287
  • Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2008). Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 62(1), 51–55. http://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51 doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51
  • Gade, M., Schuch, S., Druey, M. D., & Koch, I. (2014). Inhibitory control in task switching. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 137–159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gade, M., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs. Memory & Cognition. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0645-4
  • Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes (Attention & performance series Volume XVIII) (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Grange, J. A. (2010). Control of cognitive processes in task switching (PhD thesis). Bangor University, UK.
  • Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2014). Task switching and cognitive control (J. A. Grange & G. Houghton, Eds.). New York, NY: Oxford Univesity Press.
  • Grange, J. A., & Juvina, I. (2015). The effect of practice on n-2 repetition costs in set switching. Acta Psychologica, 154, 14–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.003
  • Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O’Loughlin, R. (2015). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2482865
  • Greenberg, J., Reiner, K., & Meiran, N. (2013). “Off with the old”: Mindfulness practice improves backward inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00618 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00618
  • Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., & Grange, J. (2009). The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 466–476. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0014648
  • Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842 doi: 10.1037/a0019842
  • Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.1 doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
  • Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 1130–1137. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027455 doi: 10.1037/a0027455
  • Leue, A., Klein, C., Lange, S., & Beauducel, A. (2013). Inter-individual and intra-individual variability of the N2 component: On reliability and signal-to-noise ratio. Brain and Cognition, 83(1), 61–71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.009
  • Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 96–109. http://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.96 doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.96
  • Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 93–99. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196261 doi: 10.3758/BF03196261
  • Mayr, U. (2007). Inhibition of task sets. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 27–44). Washington, DC: APA Books.
  • Mayr, U., Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R., & Keele, S. W. (2006). Dissociating task-set selection from task-set inhibition in the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 14–21. http://doi.org/10.1162/089892906775250085 doi: 10.1162/089892906775250085
  • Mayr, U., & Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 4–26. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
  • Moritz, S., Hübner, M., & Kluwe, R. (2004). Task switching and backward inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental … , 26(5), 677–683.
  • Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1291–3105. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1291
  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 115–121. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115
  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A., & Daniel, L. (2002). A framework for reporting and interpreting internal consistency reliability estimates. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 89–103.
  • Pettigrew, C., & Martin, R. C. (2015, November). The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–43. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1121282
  • Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2006). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 624–639. http://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500423269 doi: 10.1080/09541440500423269
  • Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2009). Inhibition in language switching: What is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1187–1195. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016376
  • Picardi, C. A., & Masick, K. D. (2013). Reliability. In Research methods: Designing and conducting research with a real-world focus (pp. 43–53). Los Angeles: SAGE. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Research-Methods-Designing-Conducting-Real-World/dp/1452230331#reader_1452230331
  • Prior, A. (2012). Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs. Cognition, 125(1), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.019 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.019
  • Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (in press). Reliability. In P. Irwing, T. Booth, & D. Hughes (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell handbook of psychometric testing. Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://personality-project.org/revelle.html
  • Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 92–105. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.92
  • Stawski, R. S., Sliwinski, M. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2013). Between-person and within-person associations among processing speed, attention switching, and working memory in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 39(2), 194–214. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2013.761556 doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.761556
  • Strauss, G. P., Allen, D. N., Jorgensen, M. L., & Cramer, S. L. (2005). Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: An investigation of color-word and picture-word versions. Assessment, 12(3), 330–337. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105276375 doi: 10.1177/1073191105276375
  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
  • Suen, Y. E. [孫耀君]. (2008). Backward inhibition in pathological gamblers (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b4171263
  • Thanoi, W., & Klainin-Yobas, P. (2015). Assessing rumination response style among undergraduate nursing students: A construct validation study. Nurse Education Today, 35(5), 641–646. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.001
  • Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 247–259. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561 doi: 10.1023/A:1023910315561
  • Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behaviour Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505. doi: 10.3758/BF03192720
  • van der Elst, W., van Boxtel, M. P. J., van Breukelen, G. J. P., & Jolles, J. (2006). The letter digit substitution test: Normative data for 1,858 healthy participants aged 24–81 from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS): Influence of age, education, and sex. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(6), 998–1009. http://doi.org/10.1080/13803390591004428 doi: 10.1080/13803390591004428
  • Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791 doi: 10.1037/a0019791
  • Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2007). Inhibition versus switching deficits in different forms of rumination: Research article. Psychological Science, 18, 546–553. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01936.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01936.x
  • Whitmer, A. J., & Banich, M. T. (2012). Brain activity related to the ability to inhibit previous task sets: An fMRI study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 661–670. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0118-6 doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0118-6

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.