Global-local processing impacts academic risk taking

References

• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301. doi: 10.1177/1094428112470848
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   Google Scholar
• Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D., & Dember, W. N. (1996). Mood and global-local visual processing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(3), 249–255. doi: 10.1017/S1355617700001193
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210–223. doi: 10.1002/tea.20270
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1990). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. In J. Fox & J. S. Long (Eds.), Modern methods of data analysis (pp. 257–291). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The need for cognition: Relationship to attitudinal processes. In R. P. McGlynn, J. E. Maddux, C. D. Stoltenberg, & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Social perception in clinical and counselling psychology (pp. 91–119). Lubbock: Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, M. M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten- to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 15–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00875.x
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical, and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 263–297. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653135
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, M. M., & Chou, F.-c. (1991). Effects of payoff and task context on academic risk taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 499–507. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.499
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, M. M., Lan, W. Y., Chou, F. C., & Qi, Y. (1989). Academic risk-taking: Developmental and cross-cultural observations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 57(4), 321–338. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1989.10806514
   Google Scholar
• Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448–456. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.448
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G., & Arnell, K. M. (2013). Investigating the stability of and relationships among global/local processing measures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(3), 394–406. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0416-7
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Porac, J. (1978). Cognitive evaluation theory and the study of human motivation. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward (pp. 149–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Demaree, H. A., DeDonno, M. A., Burns, K. J., & Erik Everhart, D. (2008). You bet: How personality differences affect risk-taking preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1484–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 745–761. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00117-2
   Google Scholar
• Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal and S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention, (pp. 167–196). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devonshire, I. M., Davis, J., Fairweather, S., Highfield, L., Thaker, C., Walsh, A., & Hathway, G. J. (2014). Risk-based learning games improve long-term retention of information among school pupils. PLoS One, 9(7), e103640. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103640
   Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Higgins, T. E. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). Using SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• International English Language Testing System (IELTS). (2015). Retrieved August 12, 2016, from http://www.ielts-exam.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, B. G. (2004). DirectRT research software (Version 2004) [Computer software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172–194. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M. J., Rangel, A., Camus, M., & Camerer, C. F. (2011). Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(2), 461–468. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1583-10.2011
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, T., & Higbee, K. L. (1974). Realism and risk taking. Psychological Reports, 34(3), 827–829. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1974.34.3.827
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B., & Dawkins, G. (2015). Local navon letter processing affects skilled behavior: A golf-putting experiment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 420–428. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0702-6
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., Förster, J. A., & Friedman, R. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 211–233. doi: 10.1177/1088868307303029
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S. W. H., & Goh, W. D. (2013). Articulation effects in melody recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1774–1792. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.766758
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S. W. H., Yuen, A. Y. L., & Tong, E. M. W. (2015). Global-local visual processing impacts risk taking behaviors, but only at first. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01257
   Google Scholar
• Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 234–252. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406921
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00436
   Google Scholar
• Milne, E., & Szczerbinski, M. (2009). Global and local perceptual style, field-independence, and central coherence: An attempt at concept validation. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 1–26. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0062-8
   Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Google Scholar
• Perfect, T. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2007). The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance. Memory, 15(7), 784–798. doi: 10.1080/09658210701654627
   Google Scholar
• Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2010). Brain substrates of behavioral programs associated with self- regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 1:152. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00152
   Google Scholar
• Tops, M., Boksem, M. A. S., Quirin, M., IJzerman, H., & Koole, S. L. (2014). Internally-directed cognition and mindfulness: An integrative perspective derived from predictive and reactive control systems theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:429. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00429
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. M., & Williamson, P. A. (1984). Asymmetric neural control systems in human self-regulation. Psychological Review, 91, 185–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.185
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, J. A., & Tikir, A. (2011). Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(2), 180–201. doi: 10.1002/bdm.677
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Understanding prime-to-behavior effects: Insights from the active-self account. Social Cognition, 32(Supplement), 109–123. doi: 10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.109
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, L. (2002). Is science dangerous? Journal of Molecular Biology, 319(4), 969–972. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00349-2
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 999–1029. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00124
   Google Scholar