Static and dynamic preload indicators in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

References

• Baue AE. MOF, MODS, and SIRS: what is in a name or an acronym?. Shock 2006; 26: 438–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shippy CR, Appel PL, Shoemaker WC. Reliability of clinical monitoring to assess blood volume in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 107–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, Papsdorf M. Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 147–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenberg SM, Ahrens TS, Annane D, Astiz ME, Chalfin DB, Dasta JF, et al. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 1928–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 64–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iberti TJ, Fischer EP, Leibowitz AB, Panacek A, Silverstein JH, Albertson TE. A multicenter study of physician's knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. JAMA 1990; 264: 2928–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teboul JL, Pinsky MR, Mercat A, Anguel N, Bernardin G, Achard JM, et al. Estimating cardiac filling pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with hyperinflation. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3631–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raper R, Sibbald WJ. Misled by the wedge? The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 1986; 89: 427–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsky MR, Vincent JL, De Smet JM. Estimating left ventricular filling pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 143: 25–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuse C, Vincent JL, Pinsky MR. Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest 1990; 98: 1450–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Tagett MG, Kline RA. End-diastolic volume. A better indicator of preload in the critically ill. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 817–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Heins J, Larky Y, Warsow K, Wilson S. End-diastolic volume vs pulmonary artery wedge pressure in evaluating cardiac preload in trauma patients. J Trauma 1994; 37: 950–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner JG, Leatherman JW. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest 1998; 113: 1048–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavernier B, Makholine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 351–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119: 867–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet-Guerroro E, Kahn RA, Moskowitz DM, Falcucci O, Bodian CA. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery. Mt Sinai J Med 2002; 69: 96–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 392–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography, 5th ed. New York: Lea and Febiger; 1994. p. 669.
   Google Scholar
• Perrino AC, Jr, Luther MA, O'Connor TZ, Cohen IS. Automated echocardiographic analysis. Examination of serial intraoperative measurements. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 285–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanowicz JH, Shaaban MJ, Cohen NH, Cahalan MK, Botvinick EH, Chatterjee KMB, et al. Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic and scintigraphic estimates of left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and ejection fraction in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 607–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer G, Meir-Hellmann A, Schier F, Reinhart K. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 180–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003; 124: 1900–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gögje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T, Lamm P, Mair H, Reichart B. Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and thoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 13: 533–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gögje O, Seebauer T, Peyerl M, Pfeiffer UJ, Reichart B. Hemodynamic monitoring by double-indicator dilution technique in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Chest 2000; 118: 775–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, Maloigne M, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, et al. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 748–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunwald E, Sonnenblick EH, Ross J. Mechanisms of cardiac contraction and relaxation. Heart disease, E Braunwald. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 1988; 383–425
   Google Scholar
• Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, Swaraj S, Cowan C, Mostafa S, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 132–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, et al. Esophageal doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1195–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafanechere A, Pene F, Goulenok C, Delahaye A, Mallet V, Choukroun G, et al. Changes in aortic blood flow induced by passive leg raising predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2006; 10: R132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C, Hayon J, Ricôme JL, Jardin F, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1740–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1834–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, Peyrouset O, Page B, Beauchet A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1734–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolaemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1997; 67: 498–502
   Google Scholar
• Brower R, Wise RA, Hassapoyannes C, Bromberger-Barnea B, Permutt S. Effect of lung inflation on lung blood volume and pulmonary venous flow. J Appl Physiol 1985; 58: 954–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denault YD, Gasior TA, Gorcsan J 3rd, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR. Determinants of aorta pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999;116:176–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendjelid K, Suter PM, Romand JA. The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96: 337–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannesson M, Besnard C, Durand P, Bohé J, Jacques D. Relation between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in ventilated patients. Crit Care 2005; 9: R562–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalini G, Rosano A, Franceschetti ME, Facchetti P, Bernardini A. Variations in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography during mechanical ventilation. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 1182–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalini G, Rosano A, Taranto M, Faggian B, Vittorielli E, Bernardini A. Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: a clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 1478–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feissel M, Badie J, Merlani PG, Faller JP, Bendjelid K. Pre-ejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2534–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, Ginies G. Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121: 1245–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1402–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magder S, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in right atrial pressure predict the response to fluid challenge. J Crit Care 1992; 7: 78–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magder S, Lagonidis D. Effectiveness of albumin versus normal saline as a test of volume responsiveness in post-cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care 1999; 14: 164–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, Besbes L, Boukef R, Boussarsar M, et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2339–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MSG, Weis FC, Kilger E, Lamm P, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 476–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar