Applications of artificial intelligence in clinical management, research, and health administration: imaging perspectives with a focus on hemophilia

References

• Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science. 2015;349(6245):255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand G, Cheng PM, Vorontsov E, et al. Deep Learning: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics. 2017;37(7):2113–2131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Tang A, Tam R, Cadrin-Chênevert A, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Canadian association of radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69(2):120–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualtierotti R, Solimeno LP, Peyvandi F. Hemophilic arthropathy: current knowledge and future perspectives. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19(9):2112–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton-Maggs PH, Pasi KJ. Haemophilias A and B. Lancet. 2003;361:1801–1809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doria AS, Keshava SN, Mohanta A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for assessment of hemophilic arthropathy: MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(1):262. 2015;204(3):W336–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DD, Brown EW. How cognitive machines can augment medical imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(1):9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Merchan EC. The current role of artificial intelligence in hemophilia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2022;15(10):927–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreedher G, Ho ML, Smith M, Udayasankar UK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(5):698–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T. What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science. 2017;358(6370):1530–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):24–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, et al. Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):505–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rascevska E, Tessier DR, Doria AS, et al. Proof-of-concept study of a 3-d ultrasound scanner used for ankle joint assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022;S0301-5629(22):00561.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins WF, Magudia K, Schmidt TMS, et al. Imaging AI in practice: a demonstration of future workflow using integration standards. Radiol Artif Intell. 2021;3(6):e210152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keshava SN, Gibikote SV, Mohanta A, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of healthy paediatric ankles and knees: a baseline for comparison with haemophilic joints. Haemophilia. 2015;21(3):e210–e222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier F, Zhang N, Mohanta M, et al. Sonography for assessment of elbows in haemophilic children: a systematic protocol. Rheumatology (Current Research). 2012;2(Suppl 2):1–9
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Duan S, Xiao W, et al. Artificial intelligence algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the effect of radiation synovectomy for hemophilic arthropathy. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022;5694163:2022.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman M, Daruge P, Dertkigil SSJ, et al. Imaging of haemophilic arthropathy in growing joints: pitfalls in ultrasound and MRI. Haemophilia. 2017;23(5):660–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takrouri HS, Alnassar MM, Amirabadi A, et al. Metal artifact reduction: added value of rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy ct in relation to single-energy CT in a piglet animal model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(3):W352–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey H, Topol EJ. More than meets the AI: refining image acquisition and resolution. Lancet. 2020;396(10261):1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(8):500–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng SWM, Yeung RSM, Morris Q. The promise of machine learning to inform the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021;17(1):1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng SWM, Duong TT, Rosenberg AM, et al. REACCH OUT and BBOP Research Consortia. The biologic basis of clinical heterogeneity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2014;66(12):3463–3475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extended Half-Life GL. Factor VIII and factor IX preparations. Transfus Med Hemother. 2018;45(2):86–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf L, Yan S, Shen MC, et al. A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and factor consumption of long-acting recombinant factor VIII products for the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A. J Med Econ. 2020;23(12):1493–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchini M, Mannucci PM. Non-factor replacement therapy for haemophilia: a current update. Blood Transfus. 2018;16(5):457–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntorp E, Hermans C, Solms A, et al. Optimising prophylaxis in haemophilia A: the ups and downs of treatment. Blood Rev. 2021;50:100852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi BS, Arruda VR. Gene therapy for hemophilia: what does the future hold? Ther Adv Hematol. 2018;9(9):273–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda VR, Doshi BS. Gene therapy for hemophilia: facts and quandaries in the 21st century. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2020;12(1):e2020069.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan MW, Leckie A, Xavier F, et al. A systematic review of MR imaging as a tool for evaluating haemophilic arthropathy in children. Haemophilia. 2013;19(6):e324–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligocki CC, Abadeh A, Wang KC, et al. A systematic review of ultrasound imaging as a tool for evaluating haemophilic arthropathy in children and adults. Haemophilia. 2017;23(4):598–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeer N, Dover S, Babyn P, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in hemophilia: results and recommendations from a global survey and consensus meeting. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021;5(5):e12531.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panwar J, Tolend M, Fernandes E, et al. Optimization of ultrasound planes for assessment of joints of patients with blood-induced arthritis: a multicentric study [abstract]. Proceedings of the International Pediatric Radiology Congress. Rome, Italy (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Strike KL, Iorio A, Jackson S, et al. Point of care ultrasonography in haemophilia care: recommendations for training and competency evaluation. Haemophilia. 2015;21(6):828–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike K, Uy M, Lawson W, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography in haemophilia care: training and competency for muscular haematomas. Haemophilia. 2018;24(3):335–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, et al. Ultrasound measurement of joint cartilage thickness in large and small joints in healthy children: a clinical pilot study assessing observer variability. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2007;5:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, et al. Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32(Suppl 1):S110–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen S, Lu X, Ma Y, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound for intra-articular bleed detection: a highly sensitive imaging modality compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16(3):490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemink MJ, Koszek WA, Hardell C, et al. Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology. 2020;295(1):4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli M, Prevedello LM, Filice RW, et al. Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(4):754–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller MJ, Reina GA, Edwards B, et al. Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: a feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation. Brainlesion. 2019;11383:92–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soenksen LR, Ma Y, Zeng C, et al. Integrated multimodal artificial intelligence framework for healthcare applications. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and north American multisociety statement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(11):1516–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Phillips RV, Malenica I, et al. Clinical artificial intelligence quality improvement: towards continual monitoring and updating of AI algorithms in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daye D, Wiggins WF, Lungren MP, et al. Implementation of clinical artificial intelligence in radiology: who decides and how? Radiology. 2022;305(3):555–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang C. Can A.I. be taught to explain itself? In The New York Times. 2017. Availbale from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/magazine/can-ai-be-taught-toexplain-itself.html. cited 2022 Nov 18
   Google Scholar
• van der Velden BHM, Kuijf HJ, Gilhuijs KGA, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2022;79:102470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khunte M, Chae A, Wang R, et al. Trends in clinical validation and usage of US food and drug administration-cleared artificial intelligence algorithms for medical imaging. Clin Radiol. 2023;78(2):123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, et al. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):231–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colak E, Moreland R, Ghassemi M. Five principles for the intelligent use of AI in medical imaging. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(2):154–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin B, Manco-Johnson ML, Ignas DM, et al. International prophylaxis study group. An MRI scale for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy from the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia. 2012;18(6):962–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takar S. Four ways the ACR’s Data Science Institute is looking to implement AI in clinical practice. Radiology Business. Available from: https://radiologybusiness.com/topics/artificial-intelligence/4-ways-acrs-data-science-institute-looking-implement-ai-clinical. cited 2022 Nov 18
   Google Scholar
• Reardon S. Rise of robot radiologists. Nature. cited 2022 Nov 18 2019;576:S55–S58. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03847-z
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DL. Artificial intelligence in imaging: the radiologist’s role. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(9Pt B):1309–1317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson DB, Harvey H, Rubin DL, et al. Regulatory frameworks for development and evaluation of artificial intelligence-based diagnostic imaging algorithms: summary and recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021;18(3Pt A):413–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gichoya JW, Banerjee I, Bhimireddy AR, et al. AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4(6):e406–e414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price WN, Cohen IG. Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nat Med. 2019;25:37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL. AMA manual of style committee. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA. 2021;326(7):621–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane I. Public standards and patients’ control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ. 2001;322:283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panch T, Mattie H, Celi LA. The “inconvenient truth” about AI in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. STRIDES. 2019. Available from: https://datascience.nih.gov/strides. cited 2022 Nov 18.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson AE, Pollard TJ, Shen L, et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data. 2016;3:160035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkomar A, Oren E, Chen K, et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar