Advancements in the use of manometry and impedance testing for esophageal functional disorders

References

• Dent J. A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement. Gastroenterology. 1976;71:263–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:G677–G684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessing BF, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical application of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14:197–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clouse RE, Parks T, Haroian L, et al. Development and clinical validation of a solid-state high-resolution pressure measurement system for simplified and consistent esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:S32–S33.
   Google Scholar
• Grubel C, Hiscock R, Hebbard G. Value of spatiotemporal representation of manometric data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:525–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soudagar AS, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Learners favour high-resolution manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings. Gut. 2012;61:798–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, et al. High-resolution manometry improves the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in patients with dysphagia: a randomized multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:372–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino E, Tutuian R. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry testing. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:167–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gyawali CP, Patel A. Esophageal motor function: technical aspects of manometry. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:527–543.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tutuian R. Evaluating esophageal bolus transit by impedance monitoring. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:595–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conchillo JM, Nguyen NQ, Samsom M, et al. Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in the evaluation of patients with non-obstructive dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2624.2632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino E, Gemignani L, Pohl D, et al. Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:476–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, et al. Distal contracion latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl D, Ciolino J, Roberts J, et al. Functional aspects of distal esophageal spasm: the role of onset velocityand contraction amplitude on bolus transit. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:569–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holloway RH. Combined impedance-manometry for the evaluation of esophageal disorders. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30:422–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JC, Nguyen NO, Jamieson GG, et al. Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:812_e393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Gyawali CP. How to optimally apply impedance in the evaluation of esophageal dysmotility. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016;18:60–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin Z, Yim B, Gawron A, et al. The four phases of esophageal bolus transit defined by high-resolution impedance manometry and fluoroscopy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;307:G437–G444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Sifrim D, et al. Aerophagia, gastric and supragastric belching: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring. Gut. 2004;53:1561–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh CM, Bredenoord AJ. Utilization of esophageal function testing for the diagnosis of the rumination syndrome and belching disorders. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:633–642.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rommel N, Tack I, Arts J, et al. Rumination or belching regurgitation? Differential diagnosis using esophageal impedance manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;22:e97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Objective manometric criteria for the rumination syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari TI, Dejaeger E, van Beckevoort D, et al. A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1454–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari TI, Papathanasopoulos A, Dejaeger E, et al. Reproducibility and agreement of pharyngeal automated impedance manometry with videofluoroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:862–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YK, Lipowska AM, Nicodeme F, et al. Assessing bolus retention in achalasia using high-resolution manometry with impedance: a comparator study with timed barium esophagogram. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:829–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Imam H, Nicodeme F, et al. Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;307:G158–G163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon BP, Frokjaer JB, Kunwald P, et al. The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for evaluation of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G377–G384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas P, Soper N, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication asessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:268–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicodeme F, Hirano I, Chen J, et al. Esophageal distensibility as a measure of disease severity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1101–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino V, De Bortoli N, Bellini M, et al. Practice guidelines on the use of esophageal manometry – A GISMAD-SIGE-AIGO medical position statement. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:1124–1135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson DA, Roman S. Esophageal provocation tests: are they useful to improve diagnostic yield of high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:e13321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro A, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, et al. Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high-resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:e13253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R, et al. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:718–e41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, et al. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1706–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinucci I, Savarino E, Pandolfino EJ, et al. Vigor of peristalsis during multiple rapid swallows is inversely correlated with acid exposure time in patients with NERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Nicodeme F, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:e489–e496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YK. Which provocation test will be added to routine high-resolution manometry protocol in unexplained dysphagia? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24:329–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvevi A, Mauro A, Pugliese D, et al. Usefulness of low- and high-volume multiple rapid swallowing during high-resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:103–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, et al. Rapid drink challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29:e12902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin I, Cisternas D, Abrao L, et al. Normal values of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in healthy subjects: results of a multicenter study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29:e13021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodland P, Gabieta-Sonmez S, Arguero J, et al. 200 mL rapid drink challenge during high-resolution manometry best predicts objective esophagogastric junction obstruction and correlates with symptom severity. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24:410–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonski W, Hila A, Jain V, et al. Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compareed with liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, et al. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1198–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen ML, Mellow MH, Robinson M. Manometry during food ingestion aids in the diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:568–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Butikofer S, et al. Pharyngeal swallowing and esophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:644–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YT, Tai LF, Yazaki E, et al. Investigation of dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery by high-resolution manometry: impact of multiple rapid swallows and a solid test meal on diagnosis, management and clinical outcome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1575–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, et al. Diagnostic yield of high-resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant symptomatic motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:654–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadlapati R, Tye M, Roman S, et al. Post-prandial high-resolution impedance manometry identifies mechanisms of non response to proton pump inhibitors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink GJ, Lei WY, Omari TI, et al. Physiological augmentation of esophageal distension pressure and peristalsis during conditions of increased esophageal emptying resistance. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29:e13225.
   Google Scholar
• Kahrilas R, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49:145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G878–G885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandolfino JE, Fox M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:796–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador R, Savarino E, Pesenti E, et al. The impact of heller myotomy on integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali CP, de Bortoli N, Clarke J, et al. Indications and interpretation of esophageal function testing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1434:239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravi K, Geno DM, Vela MF, et al. Baseline impedance measured during high-resolution esophageal impedance manometry reliably discriminates GERD patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29:e12974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino E, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. International working group for disorders of gastrointestinal motility and function. Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:323. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon consensus. Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351–1362. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman S, Holloway R, Keller J, et al. Validation of criteria for the definition of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations using high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribolsi M, Holloway RH, Emerenziani S, et al. Impedance-high resolution manometry analysis of patients with nonerosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattox III HE, Richter JE. Manometry versus pH step up. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1280–1282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs KH, Babic B, Breithaupt W, et al. EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1753–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Genio G, Tolone S, Del Genio F, et al. Impact of total fundoplication on esophageal transit: analysis by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry. Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;46(1):e1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Montenovo M, Tatum RP, Figueredo E, et al. Does combined multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance and manometry predict postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(8):656–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijenborg PW, Savarino E, Kessing BF, et al. Normal values of esophageal motility after antireflux surgery: a study using high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:929–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolone S, De Bortoli N, Marabotto E, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology is associated with a positive impedance pH monitoring in patients with GERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:1423–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolone S, Savarino E, Zaninotto G, et al. High-resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2018;6:981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Current diagnosis and management of the rumination syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:478–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1526–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, et al. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcomeof pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:48–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara R, Ikeda H, Inoue H, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: an evolving treatment for achalasia. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:410–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AK, Kumbhari V, Ngnamuengphong B, et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Carlson DA, et al. Advances in management of esophageal motility disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1692–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE. High-resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography: filling the gaps of conventional manometry. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoeij FB, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical application of esophageal high-resolution manometry in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, et al. Effects of omega-loop by-pass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2016;12:62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mion F, Tolone S, Garros A, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry after sleeve gastrectomy: increased intragastric pressure and reflux are frequent events. Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2449–2456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolone S, Savarino E, Yates RB. The impact of bariatric surgery on esophageal function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Oct;1381(1):98–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savarino E, Mei F, Parodi A, et al. Gastrointestinal motility disorder assessment in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology. 2013;52:1095–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowell MD, Umar SB, Griffing WL, et al. Esophageal motor abnormalities in patients with scleroderma: heterogeneity, risk factors, and effects on quality of life. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman S, Hot A, Fabien N, et al. Esophageal dysmotility associated with systemic sclerosis: a high-resolution manometry study. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buetikofer S, Jordan S, Santer M, et al. Abnormal esophageal motility during a solid test meal in systemic sclerosis detection even in a very early disease and association with disease progression. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31:e13480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman S, Marjoux S, Thivolet C, et al. Oesophageal function assessed by high-resolution manometry in patients with diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control. Diabetic Med. 2014;31:1452–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman S, Hirano I, Kwiatek MA, et al. Manometric features of eosinophilic esophagitis in esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:208–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Martin L, Santander C, Lopez Martin MC, et al. Esophageal motor abnormalities in eosinophilic esophagitis identified by high-resolution manometry. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1447–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A, et al. Symptom and function heterogenicity among patients with distal esophageal spasm: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:464–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fass R, Achem SR. Noncardiac chest pain: epidemiology, natural course and pathogenesis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:110–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer AD, Coen SJ, Kano M, et al. Psychophysiological responses to visceral and somatic pain in functional chest pain identify clinically relevant pain clusters. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:139–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herregods TV, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Normative values in esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YT, Yazaki E, Sifrim D. High-resolution manometry: esophageal disorders not addessed by the “Chicago Classification”. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:365–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino E, Ottonello A, Tolone S, et al. Novel insights into esophageal diagnostic procedures. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1380:162–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1726–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar