Co-creating a process of user involvement and shared decision-making in coordinated care planning with users and caregivers in social services

References

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, E., Binder, T., & Sanders, E. B. N. (2013). Tools and techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting. InSimonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 165–201). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., Tondora, J., Pavlo, A., & Stanhope, V. (2017). Shared decision making within the context of recovery-oriented care. Mental Health Review Journal, 22(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-01-2017-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, E., Best, C., & Hagen, S. (2008). Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2008(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, D., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., Cording, E., Tomson, D., Dodd, C., Rollnick, S., Edwards, A., & Barry, M. (2013). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. (2015). Sanktionerat motstånd: Brukarinflytande som fenomen och praktik [Sanctioned resistance: Service user involvement as phenomenon and practice] [Lund dissertation in social work] (pp. 337). Lund university: School of Social work.
   Google Scholar
• Grim, K., Rosenberg, D., Svedberg, P., & Schön, U.-K. (2016). Shared decision-making in mental health care: A user perspective on decisional needs in community-based services. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Wellbeing, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, K., Tistad, M., Schön, U.-K., & Rosenberg, D. (2019). The legitimacy of user knowledge in decision-making processes in mental health care. An analysis of epistemic injustice. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 6(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-019-00145-9
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, J., Kruse, J., Schmitz, F. S., Kissling, W., & Pajonk, F.-G. (2010). Patient participation in antipsychotic drug choice decisions. Psychiatry Research, 178(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship (no. 4). UNICEF International Child Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. (2017). The affinity diagram. InHoltzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. (Eds.), Contextual design: Design for life (pp. 127–146). Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesen, J. (2018). Patient views on “ladders of engagement”. Ontario spor support unit. https://johannesen.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Patient-views-on-ladders-of-engagement-Johannesen-OSSU.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Julkunen, I., & Heikkilä, M. (2012). User involvement in personal social services. In R. van Berkel & B. Valkenburg (Eds.), Making it personal: Individualising activation services in the EU (pp. 87-103). University Press Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861347978.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. R. (1984). Håndbog i fremtidsværksteder [Handbook of Future workshops]. Politisk revy.
   Google Scholar
• Kensing, F., & Greenbaum, J. (2013). Heritage: Having a say. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 21–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, L., Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2017). SDM in Israeli social services: Social workers’ perspectives on policy making and implementation. British Journal of Social Work, 47(2), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, B., & McCane, T. (2011). Person-centered nursing: Theory and practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). Keeping service user involvement in research honest. British Journal of Social Work, 40(5), 1591–1608. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, M. J. (2007). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In Jacko, J., & Sears, A. (Eds.), Human-computer Interaction Handbook (2nd ed.). (pp. 1061-1082–202)CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare. (2011). Nationella riktlinjer för schizofreni och schizofreniliknade tillstånd. Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare. (2018). Nationella riktlinjer för schizofreni och schizofreniliknade tillstånd. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-riktlinjer/2018-9-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nykänen, P. (2019). Shared decision making in the social services? Reasons to consider when choosing methods for service user participation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2007). Scenario-based design. In Jacko, J., & Sears, A. (Eds.),Human-computerInteraction Handbook (pp. 1032–1050). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, L., & Munthe, C. (2010). Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Analysis, 18(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-008-0108-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, U.-K., Grim, K., Wallin, L., Rosenberg, D., & Svedberg, P. (2018). Psychiatric service caregivers perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: A process evaluation study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Wellbeing, 13(1), 1421352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2017.1421352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities, and obligations. Children and Society, 15(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617
   Google Scholar
• SKL, Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. (2019) . Använd SIP –ett verktyg vid samverkan. För alla över 18 år, vuxna och äldre. Version 3.0. Sveriges kommuner och landsting: LTAB.
   Google Scholar
• Stovell, D., Morrison, A., Panayiotou, M., & Hutton, P. (2016). The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158931
   Google Scholar
• Torrey, W. C., & Drake, R. E. (2011). Practicing shared decision making in the outpatient psychiatric care of adults with severe mental illnesses: Redesigning care for the future. Community Mental Health Journal, 46(5), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9265-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treichler, E. B., & Spaulding, W. D. (2017). Beyond shared decision-making: Collaboration in the age of recovery from serious mental illness. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(5), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tritter, J., & McCallum, A. (2006). The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 76(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar