The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke

References

• Smith R O. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology 1996; 8(2)71–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardy P. Powered wheelchair mobility: An occupational performance evaluation perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 2004; 51(1)34–42
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Handicap Institute. (Hjälpmedelsinstitutet). In Swedish: Statistics from Assistive Technology centres, 2002. (Statistik från hjälpmedelscentraler 2002); 2004 Available from: <http://www.hi.se/butik/pdf/03325_HMC2002.pdf>. Accessed 2006 2 February
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Ustun T B, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(11/12)565–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh N E. Global initiatives in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85(9)1395–1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(11/12)628–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker J A, Paquet V L. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology 2003; 15(1)1–15, [Review] [63 refs]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J, Cook A, Hollis V, May L. Evaluation of powered mobility use in home and community environments. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 2003; 23(2)59–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wessels R, de Witte L P, Jedeloo S, van den Heuvel W PM, van den Heuvel W JA. Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in The Netherlands. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18(4)371–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001; 80(7)528–535, [Review] [28 refs]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Hellbom G. Balancing societal costs and users' quality of life – priority setting of interventions for the hard-of-hearing. International Journal of Audiology 2003; 42(Suppl 1)S9–S12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedeloo S, De Witte L, Schrijvers G. A user-centred approach to assess the effectiveness of outdoor mobility devices and services. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2002; 25(2)137–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II, WHODAS II Homepage. World Health Organization, Available from: <http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas/index.html>. Accessed 2005 20 Oct
   Google Scholar
• Buning M E, Angelo J A, Schmeler M R. Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: a pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2001; 55(3)339–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Iwarsson S, Stahle A. Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004; 36(2)70–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans R. The effect of electrically powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs on occupation: a study of users' views. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000; 63(11)547–553
   Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2004; 11(3)143–150
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson W B, Miller W C, Boily J, Steele B, Odell L, Crawford E M, Desharnais G. Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy – Revue Canadienne d Ergotherapie 2005; 72(3)142–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gitlin L N, Luborsky M R, Schemm R L. Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. Gerontologist 1998; 38(2)169–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosman-Hedstrom G, Claesson L, Blomstrand C. Assistive devices in elderly people after stroke: a longitudinal, randomized study – the Goteborg 70+ Stroke Study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2002; 9(3)109–118
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen H V, Lendal S, Schultz-Larsen K, Uhrskov T. Stroke rehabilitation: assistive technology devices and environmental modifications following primary rehabilitation in hospital – a therapeutic perspective. Assistive Technology 2003; 15(1)39–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan P A, Dyas J, Gladman J RF. Using an interview study of transport use by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18(6)703–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young J, Murray J, Forster A. Review of longer-term problems after disabling stroke. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 2003; 13(1)55–65
   Google Scholar
• Barker D J, Reid D, Cott C. Acceptance and meanings of wheelchair use in senior stroke survivors. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2004; 58(2)221–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J. PIADS – the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale. A new tool for evaluating the psychological benefits from rehabilitation technologies. PIADS Manual. 1996
   Google Scholar
• Ahlström G, Lindvall B, Wenneberg S, Gunnarsson L -G. A comprehensive rehabilitation programme tailored to the needs of adults with muscular dystrophy. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20: 132–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, de Witte L, Andrich R, Ferrario M, Persson J, Oberg B, Oortwijn W, Van Beekum T, Lorentsen O. IPPA, a user centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technology & Disability 2000; 13: 105–115
   Google Scholar
• WHO. WHODAS II Disability Assessement Schedule Training Manual: a guide to administration. World Health Organization, Geneva 2000
   Google Scholar
• Chwastiak L A, Von Korff M. Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II) in a primary care setting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003; 56(6)507–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra P K, Couper J W, Herrman H. The assessment of patients with long-term psychotic disorders: application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2004; 38(9)753–759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibbin C, Patterson T L, Jeste D V. Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia, results from the WHODAS-II. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2004; 192(6)405–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tubergen A, Landewe R, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S. Assessment of disability with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2003; 62(2)140–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers P M. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Wiley, Chichester 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Jong B A, van den Bos G AM, Beelen A, de Groot I JM, de Haan R J. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16(1)27–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Persson J, Lorentsen O, Andrich R, Ferrario M, Oortwijn W, VanBeekum T, Brodin H, de Witte L. IPPA: Individually Prioritised Problem Assessment. Technology and Disability 2002; 14(3)141–145
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin A. Research design in clinical psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Boström K, Ahlström G. Living with a chronic deteriorating disease: the trajectory with muscular dystrophy over ten years. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26(23)1388–1398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves E S, Boninger M L, Cooper R, Fitzgerald S G, Gray D B, Cooper R A. Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85(11)1854–1858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler R C, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas K R, Rush A J, Walters E E, Wang P S. National Comorbidity Survey R. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 289(23)3095–3105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmez L, Gokkoca Z, Dedeoglu N. Disability and its effects on quality of life among older people living in Antalya city center, Turkey. Archives of Gerontology & Geriatrics 2005; 40(2)213–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Mulvany F. Levels of ability and functioning: using the WHODAS II in an Irish context. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26(9)506–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmler G, Schmied B, Shetty-Lee A, Zangerle R, Hinterhuber H, Schussler G, Mumelter B. Quality of life of HIV-infected patients: psychometric properties and validation of the German version of the MQOL-HIV. Quality of Life Research 2003; 12(8)1037–1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research 2005; 14(5)1225–1237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perenboom R JM, Chorus A MJ. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(11/12)577–587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustun T B, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002; 34(5)205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar