Enabling devices, empowering people: The design and evaluation of Trackball EdgeWrite

References

• Fuhrer C S, Fridie S E. There's a mouse out there for everyone. Proceedings of CSUN's 16th Annual Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, Los Angeles, CA, March, 19 – 24. California State University Northridge, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wu T -F, Wang H -P, Chen M C. Enabling computer access for children with cerebral palsy. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human – Computer Interaction (HCI Int'l '05), Las Vegas, Nevada, July, 22 – 27. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2005, On proceedings CD
   Google Scholar
• Dawe M. Complexity, cost and customization: Uncovering barriers to adoption of assistive technology. Refereed Poster at the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '04), AtlantaGeorgia, October, 18 – 202004
   Google Scholar
• Dawe M. Desperately seeking simplicity: How young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Montréal, Québec, April, 22 – 27. ACM Press, New York 2006; 1143–1152
   Google Scholar
• Fichten C S, Barile M, Asuncion J V, Fossey M E. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: Recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23: 191–199
   Google Scholar
• Guerette P, Sumi E. Integrating control of multiple assistive devices: A retrospective review. Assist Tech 1994; 6: 67–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spaeth D M, Jones D K, Cooper R A. Universal control interface for people with disabilities. Saudi J Disabil Rehabil 1998; 4: 207–214
   Google Scholar
• Anson D K, Moist P, Przywara M, Wells H, Saylor H, Maxime H. The effects of word completion and word prediction on typing rates using on-screen keyboards. Proceedings of the RESNA 28th Annual Conference (RESNA '05), AtlantaGeorgia, June, 23 – 27. RESNA Press, Arlington, Virginia 2005, On proceedings CD
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I S, Soukoreff R W. Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Hum – Comp Interact 2002; 17: 147–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I S, Sellen A, Buxton W. A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '91), New Orleans, LO, March. ACM Press, New York 1991; 161–166
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I S, Kauppinen T, Silfverberg M. Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01), Seattle, WA, April, 31 March – 5. ACM Press, New York 2001; 9–16
   Google Scholar
• Card S K, Mackinlay J D, Robertson G. The design space of input devices. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90), Seattle, WA, April, 1 – 5. ACM Press, New York 1990; 117–124
   Google Scholar
• Epps B W, Snyder H L, Muto W H. Comparison of six cursor devices on a target acquisition task. Proceedings of the Society for Information Display, San DiegoCalifornia, May, 6 – 8. Society for Information Display, San Jose, CA 1986; 302–305
   Google Scholar
• Sperling B B, Tullis T S. Are you a better ‘mouser’ or ‘trackballer’? A comparison of cursor-positioning performance. SIGCHI Bull 1988; 19: 77–81
   Google Scholar
• Accot J, Zhai S (1999) Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: An application of the Steering Law. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May, 1999. ACM Press, New York, 466–472
   Google Scholar
• Paradise J, Trewin S, Keates S. Using pointing devices: Difficulties encountered and strategies employed. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human – Computer Interaction (HCI Int'l '05), Las Vegas, Nevada, July, 22 – 27. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2005, On proceedings CD
   Google Scholar
• Trewin S, Pain H. Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities. Int J Hum – Comp Stud 1999; 50: 109–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley K, Sinclair M. Touch-sensing input devices. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99), Pittsburgh, PA, May, 15 – 20. ACM Press, New York 1999; 223–230
   Google Scholar
• Shein F, Hamann G, Brownlow N, Treviranus J, Milner M, Parnes P. WiViK: A visual keyboard for Windows 3.0. Proceedings of the RESNA 14th Annual Conference (RESNA '91), Kansas City, MI, June, 21 – 26. RESNA Press, Washington, DC 1991; 160–162
   Google Scholar
• Bishop J B, Myers G A. Development of an effective computer interface for persons with mobility impairment. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA 1993; 1266–1267
   Google Scholar
• Ward D J, Blackwell A F, MacKay D JC. Dasher – A data entry interface using continuous gestures and language models. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '00), San Diego, CA, November, 6 – 8. ACM Press, New York 2000; 129–137
   Google Scholar
• Ward D J, MacKay D JC. Fast hands-free writing by gaze direction. Nature 2002; 418: 838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isokoski P, Raisamo R. Device independent text input: A rationale and an example. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '00), PalermoItaly, May. ACM Press, New York 2000; 76–83
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock J O, Myers B A. Gestural text entry on multiple devices. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '05), Baltimore, MD, October, 9 – 12. ACM Press, New York 2005; 184–185
   Google Scholar
• Isokoski P. Text input methods for eye trackers using off-screen targets. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '00), Palm Beach Gardens, FL, November. ACM Press, New York 2000; 15–21
   Google Scholar
• Zhai S, Kristensson P. Shorthand writing on stylus keyboard. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April, 5 – 10. ACM Press, New York 2003; 97–104
   Google Scholar
• Mankoff J, Abowd G D. Cirrin: A word-level unistroke keyboard for pen input. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '98), San Francisco, CA, November. ACM Press, New York 1998; 213–214
   Google Scholar
• Perlin K. Quikwriting: Continuous stylus-based text entry. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '98), San Francisco, CA, November, 1 – 4. ACM Press, New York 1998; 215–216
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough-Trepagnier C, Rosen M J, Galdieri B. Word menu reduces communication rate. Proceedings of the RESNA 9th Annual Conference (RESNA '86), Minneapolis, MN, June, 23 – 26. RESNA Press, Washington, DC 1986; 354–356
   Google Scholar
• Koester H H, Levine S P. Effect of a word prediction feature on user performance. Augment Alt Comm 1996; 12: 155–168
   Google Scholar
• Soede M, Foulds R A. Dilemma of prediction in communication aids. Proceedings of the RESNA 9th Annual Conference (RESNA '86), Minneapolis, Minnesota, June, 23 – 26. RESNA Press, Washington, DC 1986; 357–359
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock J O, Myers B A, Kembel J A. EdgeWrite: A stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '03), Vancouver, British Columbia, November, 2 – 5. ACM Press, New York 2003; 61–70
   Google Scholar
• Fitts P M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 1954; 47: 381–391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKenzie I S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human – computer interaction. Hum – Comp Interact 1992; 7: 91–139
   Google Scholar
• Accot J, Zhai S. Beyond Fitts' law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97), AtlantaGeorgia, March, 22 – 27. ACM Press, New York 1997; 295–302
   Google Scholar
• Accot J, Zhai S (2002) More than dotting the i's: Foundations for crossing-based interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02), Minneapolis, Minnesota, April, 20 – 252002. ACM Press, New York, 73–80
   Google Scholar
• Kristensson P, Zhai S. SHARK2: A large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '04), Santa Fe, New Mexico, October, 24 – 27. ACM Press, New York 2004; 43–52
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock J O, Myers B A, Chau D H. In-stroke word completion. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '06), MontreuxSwitzerland, October, 15 – 18. ACM Press, New York 2006; 333–336
   Google Scholar
• Zipf G. Selective studies and the principle of relative frequency in language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1932
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock J O, Myers B A. Trackball text entry for people with motor impairments. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Montréal, Québec, April, 22 – 27. ACM Press, New York 2006; 479–488
   Google Scholar
• Kucera H, Francis W N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence, RI 1967
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson P R, Rosenfeld R. Statistical language modeling using the CMU-Cambridge toolkit. Fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech '97), RhodesGreece, September, 1997, 2707–2710
   Google Scholar
• Hick W E. On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 1952; 4: 11–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 1953; 45: 188–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soukoreff R W, MacKenzie I S. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and soft keyboard. Behav Inf Tech 1995; 14: 370–379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstmann H M, Levine S P. The effectiveness of word prediction. Proceedings of the RESNA 14th Annual Conference (RESNA '91), Kansas City, MI, June, 21 – 26. RESNA Press, Washington, DC 1991; 100–102
   Google Scholar
• Soukoreff R W, MacKenzie I S. Metrics for text entry research: An evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April, 5 – 10. ACM Press, New York 2003; 113–120
   Google Scholar
• Austen I. A new rule of cursor control: Just follow your nose. The New York Times, New York 28 October, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Chau D H, Wobbrock J O, Myers B A, Rothrock B. Integrating isometric joysticks into mobile phones for text entry. Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Montréal, Québec, April, 22 – 27. ACM Press, New York 2006; 640–645
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock J O, Chau D H, Myers B A. An alternative to push, press, and tap-tap-tap: Gesturing on an isometric joystick for mobile phone text entry. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), San Jose, CA, May, 28 April – 3. ACM Press, New York 2007; 667–676
   Google Scholar
• Ivanhoe Broadcast News. Hi-tech typing. Discoveries and breakthroughs inside science. The American Institute of Physics, Winter Park, FLUSA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock J O, Myers B A. From letters to words: Efficient stroke-based word completion for trackball text entry. Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '06), Portland, OR, October, 23 – 25. ACM Press, New York 2006; 2–9
   Google Scholar