The influence of verbal training and visual feedback on manual wheelchair propulsion

References

• Russell J N, Hendershot G E, LaClere F, Howie J, Adler M. Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. Advance Data 1997; 292: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaye H, Kang T, LaPlante M. Mobility device use in the United States. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington DCUSA, Disability Statistics Report 2000;14
   Google Scholar
• Gavin-Dreschnack D, Nelson A, Fitzgerald S, Jeffery H, Sanchez-Anguiano A, Ahmed S, Powell-Cope G. Wheelchair-related falls: Current evidence and directions for improved quality care. J Nurs Care Qual 2005; 20: 119–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante M P, Hendershot G E, Moss A J. Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: Prevalence, payment, need, and trends. Advance Data 1992; 217: 1–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaye H, Kang T, LaPlante M. Wheelchair use in the United States. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Disability Statistics Abstract, Washington DCUSA 2002; 23
   Google Scholar
• Boninger M, Koontz A, Sisto S, Dyson-Hudson T, Chang M, Price R, Cooper R. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: Recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 9–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson R N, Boninger M L, Cooper R A, Shimada S D. Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 856–864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley M, Rasch E, Keyser R, Rodgers M. The biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion in individuals with and without upper-limb impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41: 385–394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodgers M, Keyser R, Rasch E, Gorman P, Russell P. Influence of training on biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 505–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer J, Boninger M, Koontz A, Ren D, Dyson-Hudson T, Cooper R. Shoulder joint kinetics and pathology in manual wheelchair users. Clin Biomech 2006; 21: 781–789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Beek A J, Hoozemans M J, Frings-Dresen M H, Burdorf A. Assessment of exposure to pushing and pulling in epidemiological field studies; an overview of methods, exposure methods, and measurement strategies. Int J Ind Ergon 1999; 24: 417–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boninger M L, Souza A L, Cooper R A, Fitzgerald S G, Koontz A M, Fay B T. Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 718–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goosey-Tolfrey V, Kirk J. Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90: 154–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot S, Veeger H, Hollander A, van der Woude L. Effect of wheelchair stroke pattern on mechanical efficiency. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 640–649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter M, Rodriguez R, Woods K, Axelson P. Stroke pattern and handrim biomechanics for level and uphill wheelchair propulsion at self-selected speeds. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 81–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson D J, Sommer H J. Kinematic features of wheelchair propulsion. J Biomech 1985; 18: 423–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuoka Y, Nakanishi R, Ueoka H, Kitano A, Takeshita K, Itoh M. Effects of wheelchair training on VO2 kinetics in the participants with spinal-cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006; 1: 167–174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotajarvi B, Basford J, An K, Morrow D, Kaufman K. The effect of visual biofeedback on the propulsion effectiveness of experienced wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 510–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot S, Dallmeijer A, van Asbeck F, Post M, Bussmann B, van der Woude L. Mechanical efficiency and wheelchair performance during and after spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 880–886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay B, Boninger M, Fitzgerald S, Souza A, Cooper R, Koontz A. Manual wheelchair pushrim dynamics in people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 935–942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallmeijer A, Kilkens O, Post M, de Groot S, Angenot E, van Asbeck F, Nene A, van der Woude L. Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion capacity during rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(3 Suppl I)55–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulig K, Newsam C, Mulroy S, Rao S, Gronley J, Bontrager E, Perry J. The effect of level of spinal cord injury on shoulder joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech 2001; 16: 744–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekman C, Miller-Porter L, Schoneberger M. Energy cost of propulsion in standard and ultralightweight wheelchairs in people with spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 146–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot S, Dallmeijer A, Kilkens O, van Asbeck F, Nene A, Angenot E, Post M, van der Woude L. Course of gross mechanical efficiency in handrim wheelchair propulsion during rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury: A prospective cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1452–1460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Drongelen S, van der Woude L, Janssen T, Angenot E, Chadwick E, Veeger D. Glenohumeral contact forces and muscle forces evaluated in wheelchair-related activities of daily living in able-bodied subjects versus subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1434–1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulroy S, Farrokhi S, Newsam C, Perry J. Effects of spinal cord injury level on the activity of muscles during wheelchair propulsion: An electromyographic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 925–934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsam C, Rao S, Mulroy S, Gronley J, Bontrager E, Perry J. Three dimensional upper extremity motion during manual wheelchair propulsion in men with different levels of spinal cord injury. Gait Posture 1999; 10: 223–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asato K, Cooper R, Robertson R, Ster J. SMARTWheels: Development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993; 40: 1320–1324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best K, Kirby R, Smith C, MacLeod D. Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: A randomized, controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 2316–2323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen R E, Boninger M L, Sawatsky B J, Mazoyer B D, Cooper R A. Preliminary outcomes of the SMARTWheel users' group database: A proposed framework for clinicians to objectively evaluate manual wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 260–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolin I, Bodin P, Kreuter M. Sitting position–posture and performance in C5–C6 tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 425–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis K, Drysdale G, Lanza D, Kolber M, Vitolo R, West R. Shoulder pain in wheelchair users with tetraplegia and paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 453–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Woude L, Bakker W, Elkhuizen J, Veeger H, Gwinn T. Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: Cross-sectional analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77: 222–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar