Children's perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings

References

• Bax MCO. Terminology and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1964; 6: 295–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, Leviton A, Paneth N, Dan B, Jacobsson B, Damiano D. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 571–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odding E, Roebroeck M E, Stam H J. The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: incidence, impairments and risk factors. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 183–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes J, Dolk H, Hill N, Pattenden S. Cerebral palsy in Northern Ireland: 1981–1983. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15: 278–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair E, Watson L, Badawi N, Stanley F J. Life expectancy among people with cerebral palsy in Western Australia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 508–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton J L, Cooke T, Pharoah P OD. Life expectancy in children with cerebral palsy. Br Med J 1994; 309: 431–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorman J M, Dallmeijer A J, Schuengel C, Knol D L, Lankhorst G J, Becher J G. Activities and participation of 9- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 937–948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtes V, Vermeer A, Meek G. Measuring perceived competence and social acceptance in children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 2002; 17: 77–87
   Google Scholar
• Schenker R, Coster W, Parush S. Participation and activity performance of students with cerebral palsy within the school environment. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 539–552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostensjo S, Carlberg E B, Vollestad N K. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 849–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M J. Living in the state of stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cox D L. Wheelchair needs for children and young people: a review. Br J Occup Ther 2003; 66: 219–223
   Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J. Changing philosophical perspectives on the management of children with physical disabilities – their effect on the use of powered mobility. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 492–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technol Disabil 1999; 11: 3–11
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 1993; 5: 36–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss M L, Wacker R R. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000; 66: 44–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielandt T, Mckenna K, Tooth L, Strong J. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT). Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006; 1: 29–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijcks B PJ, De Witte L P, Gelderblom G J, Wessels R D, Soede M. Non-use of assistive technology in The Netherlands: a non-issue. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006; 1: 97–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks N A. User's perceptions of assistive devices. Rehabilitation engineering, R V Smith, J HJ Leslie. CRC Press, Boston 1990; 495–512
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N A. Users' responses to assistive devices for physical disability. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 1417–1424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low J. Negotiating identities, negotiating environments: an interpretation of the experiences of students with disabilities. Disabil Soc 1996; 11: 235–248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber J. The design of disability products: a psychological perspective. Br J Occup Ther 1996; 59: 561–564
   Google Scholar
• Wright B A. Physical disability: a psychological approach. Harper & Row Publishers, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Covington G A. Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology: why assistive devices don't always assist. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective, D B Gray, L A Quatrano, M L Lieberman. Paul H. Brooks, Baltimore 1998; 77–88
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M J, Jutai J, Fuhrer M J, Demers L, DeRuyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007; 2: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shepherd A, Stewart H, Murchland S. Mothers' perceptions of the introduction of a hoist into the family home of children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007; 2: 117–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawlor K, Mihaylov S, Welsh B, Jarvis S, Colver A. A qualitative study of the physical, social and attitudinal environments influencing the participation of children with cerebral palsy in northeast England. Pediatr Rehabil 2006; 9: 219–228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derer K, Polsgrove L, Rieth H. A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. J Spec Educ Technol 1996; 13: 62–80
   Google Scholar
• Berry E T, McLaurin S E, Sparling J W. Parent/caregiver perspective on the use of power wheelchairs. Pediatr Phys Ther 1996; 8: 146–150
   Google Scholar
• Todis B, Walker H M. User perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Focus Except Child 1993; 26: 1–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. Code of Conduct, Ethical Principles and Guidelines. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Stigma: some notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1963
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 1977; 32: 513–531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alldred P, David M, Edwards R. Minding the gap: children and young people negotiating relations between home and school. Children, home and school: regulation, autonomy or connection?, R Edwards. Routledge Falmer, London 2002; 121–137
   Google Scholar