A tablet-based program to enable people with intellectual and other disabilities to access leisure activities and video calls

References

• Badia M, Orgaz MB, Verdugo MA, et al. Patterns and determinants of leisure participation of youth and adults with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(4):319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Persons with multiple disabilities manage positive leisure and communication engagement through a technology-aided program. Int J Dev Disabil. 2017;63(3):148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland D, van der Meer L, Sigafoos J, et al. Survey of AAC needs for adults with intellectual disability in New Zealand. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2014;26(1):115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JL, Hodapp RM. Doing nothing: adults with disabilities with no daily activities and their siblings. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;117(1):67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Foley A, Ferri BA. Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2012;12(4):192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen JM, Alber-Morgan SR, Simmons-Reed EA, et al. Effects of self-directed video prompting using iPads on the vocational task completion of young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Vocational Rehabil. 2017;46(3):361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. People with multiple disabilities use assistive technology to perform complex activities at the appropriate time. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2016;15(3):261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cruzado D, Cuestas-Vargas AI. Smartphone reminder for physical activity in people with intellectual disabilities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(4):442–443.
   Google Scholar
• Dahan-Oliel N, Shikako-Thomas K, Majnemer A. Quality of life and leisure participation in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: a thematic analysis of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(3):427–439.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Technology-based programs to support forms of leisure engagement and communication for persons with multiple disabilities: two single-case studies. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(3):209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Supporting leisure and communication in people with visual and intellectual disabilities via a smartphone-based program. Br J Vis Impair. 2017;35(3):257–263.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mouth N, Al-Khalifa HS. The accessibility and usage of smartphones by Arab-speaking visually impaired people. Int J Perv Comput Commun. 2015;11(4):418–435.
   Google Scholar
• Hreha K, Snowdon L. We all can call: enhancing accessible cell phone usage for clients with spinal cord injury. Assist Technol. 2011;23(2):76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O'Reilly MF, et al. Case studies of technology for adults with multiple disabilities to make telephone calls independently. Percept Mot Skills. 2014;119(1):320–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama T, Watanabe T, Takahashi K, et al. Development of communication assistive technology for persons with deaf-blindness and physical limitation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:974–979.
   Google Scholar
• Meder AM, Wegner JR. iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: a survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(1):27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailidis A, Melonis M, Keyfitz R, et al. A nonlinear contextually aware prompting system (N-CAPS) to assist workers with intellectual and developmental disabilities to perform factory assembly tasks: system overview and pilot testing. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;11(7):604–612.
   Google Scholar
• Sahasrabudhe S, Singh R, Heath D. Innovative affordances for blind smartphone users: a qualitative study. J Technol Pers Disabil. 2016;4:145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Perilli V, Di Leone A, et al. Technological aids to support choice strategies by three girls with Rett syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;36:36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara DM, van der Meer L, Ramdoss S, et al. Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(1):147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Schepis MM, Reid DH. Effects of a voice output communication on interaction between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995;28(1):73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Limbrick L. A review of the use of touch-screen mobile devices by people with developmental disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(12):3777–3791.
   Google Scholar
• Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weiss PL. Virtual reality as a leisure activity for young adults with physical and intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2008;29(3):273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, et al. A modified smartphone-based program to support leisure and communication activities in people with multiple disabilities. Adv Neurodev Disord. 2017;2(3):293–299.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. The leisure activity settings and experiences of youth with severe disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(4):259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Caffò AO, Damiani R, et al. Assistive technology-based programs to promote communication and leisure activities by three children emerged from a minimally conscious state. Cogn Process. 2015;16(1):69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Cavender A, Vanam R, Barney DK, et al. MobileASL: intelligibility of sign language video over mobile phones. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008;3(1–2):93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Warnicke C, Plejert C. Turn-organization in mediated phone interaction using Video Relay Service (VRS). J Pragmat. 2012;44(10):1313–1334.
   Google Scholar
• Warnicke C, Plejert C. The positioning and bimodal mediation of the interpreter in a Video Relay Interpreting (VRI) service setting. Interpreting. 2016;18(2):198–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Technology-aided programs for assisting communication and leisure engagement of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Two single-case studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(5):1605–1614.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Makel MC, Plucker JA. Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the. Education Sciences. Educ Res. 2014;43(6):304–316.
   Google Scholar
• Balboni G, Belacchi C, Bonichini S, et al. Vineland II. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. 2nd ed. Standardizzazione Italiana. Firenze: OS; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. 2nd ed. (Vineland II). Minneapolis: Pearson; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur E, Schmelkin L. Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. New York: Psychology Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change. 3rd ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Davis JL. Effect size in single-case research: a review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behav Modif. 2011;35(4):303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(2):85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce WD, Cheney CD. Behavior analysis and learning. 4th ed. New York: Psychology Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):811–817.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuer N, Keter A, Sachs D. Accessibility to information and communication technology for the social participation of youths with disabilities: a two-way street. Behav Sci Law. 2014;32(1):76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J, Morgan RL, Salzberg CL. Job-preference and job-matching assessment results and their association with job performance and satisfaction among young adults with developmental disabilities. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2014;49(2):301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Virués-Ortega J, Pritchard K, Grant RL, et al. Clinical decision making and preference assessment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;119(2):151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Cobigo V, Morin D, Lachapelle Y. A method to assess work task preferences. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2009;44(4):561–572.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer L, Sigafoos J, O’Reilly MF, et al. Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication intervention for individuals with developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(5):1422–1431.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon CM, Carr JE. Assessing indices of happiness and unhappiness in individuals with developmental disabilities: a review. Behav Intervent. 2007;22(3):229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Moore K, Delaney JA, Dixon MR. Using indices of happiness to examine the influence of environmental enhancements for nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007;40(3):541–544.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson CA, MacDonald RPF, Mansfield R, et al. Social validation of the New England center for children-core skills assessment. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(1):65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Luiselli JK, Bass JD, Whitcomb SA. Teaching applied behavior analysis knowledge competencies to direct-care service providers: outcome assessment and social validation. Behav Modif. 2010;34(5):403–414.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo KM, Liu CF, Ma CC. An investigation of the effect of nurses’ technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(1):88. doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947/13/88
   Google Scholar
• Plackett R, Thomas S, Thomas S. Professionals’ views on the use of smartphone technology to support children and adolescents with memory impairment due to acquired brain injury. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(3):236–243.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke P, Ekins R, Timmins B, et al. Crucial design issues for special access technology: a Delphi study. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(1):48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, et al. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments: an intervention study. Dev Nurorehabil. 2017;20(3):129–141.
   Google Scholar