Durable medical equipment reuse and recycling: uncovering hidden opportunities for reducing medical waste

References

• Thakur V, Ramesh A. Health care waste management research: a structured analysis and review (2005–2014). Waste Manag Res. 2015;33(10):855–870.
   Google Scholar
• Diconsiglio J. Reprocessing SUDs reduces waste, costs. Mater Manag Health Care. 2008;17(9):40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kagoma Y, Stall N, Rubinstein E, et al. People, planet and profits: the case for greening operating rooms. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184(17):1905–1911.
   Google Scholar
• Conrardy J, Hillanbrand M, Myers S, et al. Reducing medical waste. AORN J. 2010;91(6):711–721.
   Google Scholar
• Hailey D, Jacobs P, Ries N, et al. Reuse of single use medical devices in Canada: clinical and economic outcomes, legal and ethical issues, and current hospital practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):430–436.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs P, Polisena J, Hailey D, et al. Economic analysis of reprocessing single-use medical devices: a systematic literature review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(4):297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakye G, Brat G, Makary M. Green surgical practices for health care. Arch Surg. 2011;146(2):131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare claims processing manual [Internet]. [cited 2015 December 10]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/clm104c20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Center for Health Statistics Health Indicators Warehouse [Internet]. [cited 2015 December 10]. Available from: www.healthindicators.gov
   Google Scholar
• Pressler KA, Ferraro KF. Assistive device use as a dynamic acquisition process in later life. Gerontologist. 2010;50(3):371–381.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. The solid waste dilemma: an action. Washington DC: EPA/530-SW-89-019; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam S. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McGain F, Naylor C. Environmental sustainability in hospitals—a systematic review and research agenda. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014;19(4):245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin N. Sociological methods: a sourcebook. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: Creative Commons; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State’s Health Data and Charity Care policy, 70.170 RCW § 60. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• McVeigh P. OR nursing and environmental ethics: medical waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. Today's or Nurse. 1993;15(1):13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich N, Carlson D, Bailey N. Sources of information about how to obtain assistive technology: findings from a national survey of persons with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2003;15(1):28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy J. Healthcare professionals' perspectives on environmental sustainability. Nurs Ethics. 2014;21(4):414–425.
   Google Scholar
• Rambur BA, Vallett C, Cohen J, et al. The moral cascade: distress, eustress, and the virtuous organization. Organ Ethical Behav. 2013;1(1):41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Topf M. Psychological explanations and interventions for indifference to greening hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(1):2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor T, Marsh C, Butler S, et al. Realizing resource efficiency in the management of health care waste from the Cornwall National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Waste Manage. 2008;28(7):1209–1218.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel LM. Environmental and financial impact of a hospital recycling program. AANA J. 2011;79(4):S8–S14.
   Google Scholar
• Laustsen G. Reduce—recycle—reuse: guidelines for promoting perioperative waste management. AORN J. 2007;85(4):717–728.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor C, Appleby J. Environmentally sustainable health and social care: scoping review and implications for the English NHS. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(2):114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Wright AJ. Durable medical equipment recycling: a pilot program. J Trauma Nurs. 2012;19(1):E5–E6.
   Google Scholar
• Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b. 2010
   Google Scholar
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6402(d)(2)(B)
   Google Scholar
• Burke CE. A summary of assistive technology equipment recycling: a comparison and feasibility study. Technol Disabil. 1997;7(3):175–182.
   Google Scholar
• The National Assistive Technology Technical Assistance Partnership: statewide AT programs chartbook—state level data from the 2009-2011 state plans. Available from: http://www.resnaprojects.org/nattap/activities/chartbook/RESNA.html#intro
   Google Scholar
• Walker K, Walker C, Bean-Kampwerth L. One solution to assistive technology barriers: assistive technology reutilization. AOTA Technology Special Interest Section Quarterly 2012;22:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Li Pi Shan R, Chrusch W, Linassi A, et al. Reuse and refurbish: a cost savings delivery model for specialized seating. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1286–1288.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda Y. Importance of patient education on home medical care waste disposal in Japan. Waste Manag. 2014;34(7):1330–1334.
   Google Scholar
• Subratty A, Nathire M. A survey on home generated medical waste in Mauritius. Int J Environ Health Res. 2005;15(1):45–52.
   Google Scholar