References
- Guanziroli E, Cazzaniga M, Colombo L, et al. Assistive powered exoskeleton for complete spinal cord injury: correlations between walking ability and exoskeleton control. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(2):209–216.
- National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham (AL): National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center; 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.scirepair.com/uploads/8/6/1/5/86150236/spinal_cord_injury_facts_and_figures_at_a_glance_2017.pdf
- Arazpour M, Sharifi G, Mousavi ME, et al. Role of gait training in recovery of standing and walking in subjects with spinal cord injury. Essentials of spinal cord injury medicine. UK: IntechOpen; 2018.
- Contreras-Vidal JL, Bhagat NA, Brantley J, et al. Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(3):031001.
- Hicks AL, Ginis KA. Treadmill training after spinal cord injury: it’s not just about the walking. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):241–248.
- Field-Fote EC. Spinal cord control of movement: implications for locomotor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2000;80(5):477–484.
- Ali H. Bionic exoskeleton: history, development, and the future. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng. 2014;58–62.
- Pinto D, Garnier M, Barbas J, et al. Budget impact analysis of robotic exoskeleton use for locomotor training following spinal cord injury in four SCI model system. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):4.
- Hartigan C, Kandilakis C, Dalley S, et al. Mobility outcomes following five training sessions with a powered exoskeleton. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):93–99.
- Huang G. Wearable robots. Technol Rev. 2004. Available from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/402868/demo-wearable-robots/
- Herr H. Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6(1):21.
- Kressler J, Thomas CK, Field-Fote EC, et al. Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(10):1878–1887.e4.
- Asselin P, Knezevic S, Kornfeld S, et al. Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):147–158.
- Asselin PK, Avedissian M, Knezevic S, et al. Training persons with spinal cord injury to ambulate using a powered exoskeleton. J Vis Exp. 2016;(112). Available from: https://www.jove.com/video/54071/training-persons-with-spinal-cord-injury-to-ambulate-using-powered
- Yang A, Asselin P, Knezevic S, et al. Assessment of in-hospital walking velocity and level of assistance in a powered exoskeleton in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(2):100–109.
- Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, et al. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:169.
- Gorgey AS. Robotic exoskeletons: the current pros and cons. World J Orthop. 2018;9(9):112–119.
- Juszczak M, Gallo E, Bushnik T. Examining the effects of a powered exoskeleton on quality of life and secondary impairments in people living with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018;24(4):336–342.
- Swinnen E, Duerinck S, Baeyens JP, et al. Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):520–526.
- Sheng B, Zhang Y, Meng W, et al. Bilateral robots for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38(7):587–606.
- Heinemann AW, Jayaraman A, Mummidisetty CK, et al. Experience of robotic exoskeleton use at four spinal cord injury model systems centers. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(4):256–267.
- Adya M, Samant D, Scherer MJ, et al. Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cogn Process. 2012;13(S1):75–78.
- World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
- Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs) [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.]. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(1):1–8.
- Scherer MJ, Federici S. Why people use and don’t use technologies: introduction to the special issue on assistive technologies for cognition/cognitive support technologies. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):315–319.
- Heinemann A, Magiera-Planey R, Geist C, editors. Human factors in functional electrical stimulation research participation. Second International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, Combined with the RESNA 7th Annual Conference; Ottawa, ON, Canada: Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America; 1984.
- Heinemann AW, Magiera-Planey R, Gimenes MG, et al. Evaluating the special needs of functional neuromuscular stimulation research candidates. J Med Eng Technol. 1985;9(4):167–173.
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
- Clarke V, Braun V. Teaching thematic analysis: overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist. 2013;26(2):120–123.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
- Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, et al. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(3):1–21.