Caregiver perspectives on a smart home-based socially assistive robot for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia

References

• Alzheimer’s Association: Alzheimer’s facts and figures [Internet]. Chicago (IL): Alzheimer’s Association; c2020. Available from: https://alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher D, Ni Mhaolain A, Crosby L, et al. Dependence and caregiver burden in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2011;26(2):110–114.
   Google Scholar
• Genworth: cost of care survey 2019 [Internet]. New York (NY): Genworth Financial Inc; c2020. Available from: https://www.genworth.com/aging-and-you/finances/cost-of-care.html
   Google Scholar
• Astell AJ, Bouranis N, Hoey J, et al. Technology and dementia: the future is now. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(3):131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, et al. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):114–120.e1.
   Google Scholar
• Huschilt J, Clune L. The use of socially assistive robots for dementia care. J Gerontol Nurs. 2012;38(10):15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rudzicz F, Wang R, Begum M, et al. Speech interaction with personal assistive robots supporting aging at home for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2015;7(2):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Begum M, Serna RW, Yanco HA. Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2016;8(2):157–181.
   Google Scholar
• Huijnen C, Lexis M, Jansens R, et al. How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(10):3079–3096.
   Google Scholar
• Pennisi P, Tonacci A, Tartarisco G, et al. Autism and social robotics: a systematic review. Autism Res. 2016;9(2):165–183.
   Google Scholar
• Malik NA, Hanapiah FA, Rahman RA, et al. Emergence of socially assistive robotics in rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: a review. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 2016;13(3):135.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ, Loureiro RCV, Harwin WS. Collaborative tele-rehabilitation and robot-mediated therapy for stroke rehabilitation at home or clinic. Intel Serv Robotics. 2008;1(2):109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, et al. Effectiveness of robot paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: a multicenter quasi-experimental study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(11):946–950.
   Google Scholar
• Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology. 2009;8(2):94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kachouie R, Sedighadeli S, Khosla R, et al. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 2014;30(5):369–393.
   Google Scholar
• Chu MT, Khosla R, Khaksar SM, et al. Service innovation through social robot engagement to improve dementia care quality. Assistive Technol. 2017;29(1):8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Liang A, Piroth I, Robinson H, et al. A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(10):871–878.
   Google Scholar
• Salichs MA, Encinar IP, Salichs E, et al. Study of scenarios and technical requirements of a social assistive robot for Alzheimer’s disease patients and their caregivers. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2016;8(1):85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Louie WY, McColl D, Nejat G. Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assistive Technol. 2014;26(3):140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Pino M, Boulay M, Rigaud AS. Acceptance of social assistive robots to support older adults with cognitive impairment and their caregivers. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2013;9(4):P342–P342.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003; 27(3):425–478.
   Google Scholar
• Pal D, Funilkul S, Charoenkitkarn N, et al. Internet-of-things and smart homes for elderly healthcare: an end user perspective. IEEE Access. 2018;6:10483–10496.
   Google Scholar
• Williams MD, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. J Enterprise Info Manag. 2015;28(3):443–488.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York (NY): Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Vroman KG, Lysack C, et al. Multi-stakeholder perspectives on information communication technology training for older adults: implications for teaching and learning. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):453–461.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama L. Perspectives on agency interacting with and through personal robots. In: Zacarias M, Oliveira JV, editors. Human-computer interaction: the agency perspective. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan S, Murphy K, Barrett E, et al. Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a literature review. Int J Soc Robotics. 2018;10(5):643–668.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux P, Grimard D. When robots care: public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults. Soc Sci Med. 2018;211:330–337.
   Google Scholar
• Begum M, Huq R, Wang R, et al. Collaboration of an assistive robot and older adults with dementia. Gerontechnology. 2015;13(4):405–419.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RH, Sudhama A, Begum M, et al. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017; 29(1):67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Chen TL, Kemp CC, et al. Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. Int J Soc Robotics. 2014;6(2):213–227.
   Google Scholar
• Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F, et al. “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:141.
   Google Scholar
• Begum M, Wang R, Huq R, et al. Performance of daily activities by older adults with dementia: the role of an assistive robot. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); 2013 Jun 24; Seattle, (WA): IEEE; 2013. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Young JE, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, et al. Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int J Soc Robotics. 2009;1(1):95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink M. Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction; 2011 Mar 6; Lausanne, Switzerland: ACM. p. 147–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gross HM, Schroeter C, Mueller S, et al. Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC); 2012 Oct 14; Seoul, Korea: IEEE. p. 637–644.
   Google Scholar