A rapid review of the effect of assistive technology on the educational performance of students with impaired hearing

References

• World Health Organization. Assistive technology [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
   Google Scholar
• WHO D-G. Improving access to assistive technology (WHO Executive Board 142nd session, provisional agenda item 4.5) [Internet]; 2017. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB142_21-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Viriyathorn S, et al. Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low- and middle-income countries. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018;7:84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. Deafness and hearing loss [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
   Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Mannan AH, Schneider M, et al. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;12(7):705–712.
   Google Scholar
• Holt RF. Assistive hearing technology for deaf and hard-of-hearing spoken language learners. Educ Sci. 2019;9:153.
   Google Scholar
• Michael CA, McDermott J. Assistive technology integration in special education teacher preparation: program co-ordinators’ perceptions of current attainment and importance. J Spec Educ Technol. 2003;18:29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Newman L, Wagner M, Huang T, et al. Secondary school programs and performance of students with disabilities: a special topic report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2012-3000 [Internet]. Menlo Park (CA): SRI International; 2011; [cited 2014 Apr 24]. Available from: http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2004_05/nlts2_report_2004_05_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marschark M, Lang HG, Albertini JA. Educating deaf students: from research to practice. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Crandell CC, Smaldino JJ. Improving classroom acoustics: utilizing hearing assistive technology and communication strategies in the educational setting. Volta Rev. 1999;101:47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Addison JT. Urie Bronfenbrenner. Hum Ecol. 1992;20(2):16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot LB, Stinson MS, McKee B, et al. College students' perceptions of the C-Print speech-to-text transcription system. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2001;6(4):285–298.
   Google Scholar
• DiSarno NJ, Schowalter M, Grassa P. Classroom amplification to enhance student performance. Teach Except Child. 2002;34(6):20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Stinson MS, Elliot LB, Kelly RR, et al. Deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ memory of lectures with speech-to-text and interpreting/note taking services. J Spec Educ. 2009;43(1):52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wald M. An exploration of the potential of automatic speech recognition to assist and enable receptive communication in higher education. Res Learn Technol. 2006;1(14):9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzu A. The factors that motivate and hinder the students with hearing impairment to use mobile technology. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2011;10(4):336–348.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold S, Mayer C. Deaf education: the impact of cochlear implantation. Deaf Educ Int. 2012;14(1):2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rekkendal AM. Assistive hearing technologies among students with hearing impairment: factors that promote satisfaction. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012;17(4):499–517.
   Google Scholar
• Cawthon SW, Leppo R. Accommodations quality for students who are d/deaf or hard of hearing. Am Ann Deaf. 2013;158(4):438–452.
   Google Scholar
• Maiorana-Basas M, Pagliano CM. Technology use among adults who are deaf and hard of hearing: a national survey. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2014;19(3):400–410.
   Google Scholar
• Cawthon SW, Leppo R, Ge JJ, et al. Accommodations use patterns in high school and postsecondary settings for students who are D/deaf or hard of hearing. Am Ann Deaf. 2015;160(1):9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail J, Ibrahimi E. Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students. Educ Inf Technol. 2017;22(3):883–899.
   Google Scholar
• Griffen E. Who uses closed captions? Not just the deaf or hard of hearing; [Internet]; 2015. Available from: https://www.3playmedia.com/2015/08/28/who-uses-closed-captions-not-just-the-deaf-or-hard-of-hearing/
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld A. The benefit of real-time captioning in a mainstream classroom as measured by working memory. Volta Rev. 1998;100(1):29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lang HG. Higher education for deaf students: research priorities in the new millennium. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2002;7(4):267–280.
   Google Scholar
• Moisey SD. Students with disabilities in distance education: characteristics, course enrollment and completion, and support services. J Distance Educ. 2004;19(1):73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Convertino CM, Marschark M, Sapere P, et al. Predicting academic success among deaf college students. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009;14(3):324–343.
   Google Scholar
• Beal-Alvarez J, Cannon JE. Technology intervention research with deaf and hard of hearing learners: levels of evidence. Am Ann Deaf. 2014;158(5):486–505.
   Google Scholar
• Marschark M, Rhoten C, Fabich M. Effects of cochlear implants on children’s reading and academic achievement. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007;12(3):269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Stinson MS, Walter GG. Persistence in college. In: Foster SB, Walter GG, editors. Deaf students in postsecondary education. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 43–64.
   Google Scholar