Smart home and communication technology for people with disability: a scoping review

References

• Gentry T. Smart homes for people with neurological disability: state of the art. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(3):209–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownsell S, Bradley D, Blackburn S, et al. A systematic review of lifestyle monitoring technologies. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(4):185–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund ML, Lövgren-Engström AL, Lexell J. Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):402–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogerson L, Burr J, Tyson S. The feasibility and acceptability of smart home technology using the Howz system for people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(2):148–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh R, Lindeman D, Ratan S, et al. The new era of connected aging: a framework for understanding technologies that support older adults in aging in place. Berkeley (CA): University of California; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Scheme Act. National Disability Insurance Scheme Act (Cth) s.34 [Internet].; 2013 [cited 2020 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2013A00020
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency. Assistive technology strategy. Canberra (Australia): NDIA; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. National Broadband Network [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.communications.gov.au/what-we-do/internet/national-broadband-network
   Google Scholar
• Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, et al. What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarou I, Karakostas A, Stavropoulos TG, et al. A novel and intelligent home monitoring system for care support of elders with cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54(4):1561–1591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/index4.html
   Google Scholar
• Malmgren Fänge A, Carlsson G, Chiatti C, et al. Using sensor-based technology for safety and independence – the experiences of people with dementia and their families. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020; 34(3):648–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Callaway L, Ackerl J, et al. Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: implications for occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(2):89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man YP, Cremers G, Spreeuwenberg M, et al. Platform for frail elderly people supporting information and communication. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:311–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsson A, Persson A, Bartfai A, et al. Sensor technology more than a support. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25(2):79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron J, Light J. “My world has expanded even though I’m stuck at home”: experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):680–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavey A, Warren N, Allen-Collinson J. “It gives me my freedom”: technology and responding to bodily limitations in motor neuron disease. Med Anthropol. 2015;34(5):442–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Hutchinson C, Grace E, et al. “I like talking to people on the computer”: outcomes of a home-based intervention to develop social media skills in youth with disabilities living in rural communities. Res Dev Disabil. 2018;76:110–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang C, Weng H, Wang L, et al. An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers’ burden. J Mot Behav. 2014;46(4):233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Janeslatt G. How people with cognitive disabilities experience electronic planning devices. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Martin L, Dag M, et al. A balance of social inclusion and risks: staff perceptions of information and communication technology in the daily life of young adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability in a social care context. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019;16(3):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssens C, Kumar R, Adams AE, et al. Personalized technology to support older adults with and without cognitive impairment living at home. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015;30(1):85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Walsem MR, Howe EI, Frich JC, et al. Assistive technology for cognition and health-related quality of life in Huntington’s disease. J Huntingtons Dis. 2016;5(3):261–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, Reilly MFO, et al. A basic technology-aided programme for leisure and communication of persons with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: performance and social rating. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong D, Sinclair K, Seabrook E, et al. Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2387–2394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Tregloan K, Williams G, et al. Evaluating access and mobility within a new model of supported housing for people with neurotrauma: a pilot study. Brain Impair. 2016;17(1):64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corallo F, Bonanno L, Buono Lo V, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication effects on quality of life in patients with locked-in syndrome and their caregivers. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(9):1929–1933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londral A, Pinto A, Pinto S, et al. Quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients and caregivers: impact of assistive communication from early stages. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52(6):933–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naick M. Innovative approaches of using assistive technology to support carers to care for people with night-time incontinence issues for people with night-time incontinence issues. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2017;73(2):128–130.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke DM, Ames M, Geffen S. Life without limbs: technology to the rescue. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(4):517–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailidis A, Cockburn A, Longley C, et al. The acceptability of home monitoring technology among community-dwelling older adults and baby boomers. Assist Technol. 2008;20(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend D, Knoefel F, Goubran R. Privacy versus autonomy: a tradeoff model for smart home monitoring technologies. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS. 2011;:4749–4752.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairment. New York (NY): Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Steel EJ, Buchanan R, Layton N, et al. Currency and competence of occupational therapists and consumers with rapidly changing technology. Occup Ther Int. 2017;2017:5612843–5612845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz EM, Botrel L, Kaufmann T, et al. Long-term independent brain-computer interface home use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked-in state: a case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar