3,709
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Wheelchair service provision education for healthcare professional students, healthcare personnel and educators across low- to high-resourced settings: a scoping review protocol

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 343-349 | Received 05 Aug 2020, Accepted 13 Nov 2020, Published online: 10 Dec 2020

References

  • Rosso AL, Taylor JA, Tabb LP, et al. Mobility, disability, and social engagement in older adults. J Aging Health. 2013;25:617–637.
  • Gray-Miceli D. Impaired mobility and functional decline in older adults: evidence to facilitate a practice change. Nurs Clin North Am. 2017;52:469–487.
  • Gowran R, McKay E, O’Regan B. Sustainable solutions for wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: presenting a cosmopolitan narrative with rich pictures. TAD. 2014;26:137–152.
  • Jefferds AN, Beyene NM, Upadhyay N, et al. Current state of mobility technology provision in less-resourced countries. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21:221–242.
  • World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2011.
  • World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less-resourced settings. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2008.
  • World Bank. Disability inclusion. 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 09]. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disability
  • World Bank. Population indicator. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
  • Banks LM, Kuper H, Polack S. Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189996.
  • McSweeney E, Gowran RJ. Wheelchair service provision education and training in low and lower middle income countries: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14:33–45.
  • Gupta N, Castillo-Laborde C, Landry MD. Health-related rehabilitation services: assessing the global supply of and need for human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:276.
  • Elwan A. Poverty and disability: a survey of the literature. Vol. 9932. Washington (DC): Social Protection Advisory Service; 1999.
  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Social Panorama of Latin America. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). New York (NY): United Nations Population Fund; 2009.
  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) New York. 2006. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
  • Toro ML, Eke C, Pearlman J. The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less-resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;16:26.
  • Kirby RL, Doucette SP. Relationships between wheelchair services received and wheelchair user outcomes in less-resourced settings: a cross-sectional survey in Kenya and the Philippines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100:1648–1654.e9.
  • Bray N, Noyes J, Edwards RT, et al. Wheelchair interventions, services and provision for disabled children: a mixed-method systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:309.
  • Burrola-Mendez Y, Goldberg M, Gartz R, et al. Development of a hybrid course on wheelchair service provision for clinicians in international contexts. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199251.
  • Fung K, Miller T, Rushton PW, et al. Integration of wheelchair service provision education: current situation, facilitators and barriers for academic rehabilitation programs worldwide. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:553–562.
  • Rushton PW, Fung K, Gauthier M, et al. Development of a toolkit for educators of the wheelchair service provision process: the Seating and Mobility Academic Resource Toolkit (SMART). Hum Resour Health. 2020;18:14.
  • Burrola-Mendez Y, Toro-Hernández ML, Goldberg M, et al. Implementation of the hybrid course on basic wheelchair service provision for Colombian wheelchair service providers. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204769.
  • Burrola-Mendez Y, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Goldberg M, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of a hybrid and in-person courses of wheelchair service provision knowledge: a controlled quasi-experimental study in India and Mexico. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0217872–e0217872.
  • Toro-Hernández ML, Mondragón-Barrera MA, Torres-Narváez MR, et al. Undergraduate physiotherapy students’ basic wheelchair provision knowledge: a pilot study in two universities in Colombia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:336–341.
  • Best KL, Miller WC, Routhier F. A description of manual wheelchair skills training curriculum in entry-to-practice occupational and physical therapy programs in Canada. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:401–406.
  • Coolen AL, Kirby RL, Landry J, et al. Wheelchair skills training program for clinicians: a randomized controlled trial with occupational therapy students. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1160–1167.
  • Fung KH, Rushton PW, Gartz R, et al. Wheelchair service provision education in academia. Afr J Disabil. 2017;6:340.
  • Pearlman J, Cooper R, Goldberg M, et al. The need and progress toward a global standard for wheelchair service delivery. Proceedings of the 5th European Seating Symposium (ESS); 2016 June 13–16; Dublin, Ireland.
  • World Health Organization. Wheelchair service training package – basic level Geneva. 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/wheelchairpackage/en/
  • World Health Organization. Wheelchair service training package – intermediate level Geneva. 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/wheelchairpackage/wstpintermediate/en
  • World Health Organization. WHO wheelchair service training package for managers and stakeholders Geneva. 2015. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/wheelchairpackage/wstpmanagers/en/
  • Goldberg M, Pearlman J, Rushton P, et al. The International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP): a resource aiming to improve wheelchair services worldwide. Br J Occup Ther. 2018;81:671–672.
  • International Society for Wheelchair Professionals. About ISWP. Available from: https://wheelchairnetwork.org/about-win/
  • Gartz R, Goldberg M, Miles A, et al. Development of a contextually appropriate, reliable and valid basic wheelchair service provision test. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:333–340.
  • MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:454–466.
  • Mishra S, Pupulin A, Ekman B, et al. National priority assistive product list development in low resource countries: lessons learned from Tajikistan. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;2:1–8.
  • Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Viriyathorn S, et al. Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low- and middle-income countries. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018;7:84–89.
  • Kirby RR, Smith C, Routhier F, et al. The wheelchair skills program manual. Halifax (NS): Dalhousie University; 2015. Available from: www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/eng/manual.php
  • Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, et al. Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015. Adelaide (South Australia): The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015
  • Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
  • Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
  • Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
  • United Nations. Standard rules for the equalization of opportunities of persons with disabilities. New York (NY): United Nations; 1993.
  • Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne (Australia): Veritas Health Innovation. Available from: www.covidence.org
  • Colquhoun HL, Jesus TS, O’Brien KK, et al. Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:1249–1256.
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:15–15.
  • Vassar M, Atakpo P, Kash MJ. Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:302–304.
  • Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5:371–385.
  • Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:141–146.
  • Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:59.
  • Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.