A multidisciplinary advanced approach in central pontine myelinolysis recovery: considerations about a case report

References

• Adams RD, Victor M, Mancall EL. Central pontine myelinolysis: a hitherto undescribed disease occurring in alcoholic and malnourished patients. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1959;81(2):154–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKee AC, Winkelman MD, Banker BQ. Central pontine myelinolysis in severely burned patients: relationship to serum hyperosmolality. Neurology. 1988;38(8):1211–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelman MD, Galloway PG. Central nervous system complications of thermal burns. A postmortem study of 139 patientsMedicine. 1992;71(5):271–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gocht A, Colmant HJ. Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: a report of 58 cases. Clin Neuropathol. 1987;6(6):262–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister HW, Witt TN, Soyka M. Pontine und extrapontine myelinolyse. Nervenheilkunde. 1989;8:134–138.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller K, Guerrero C, Kyin M, et al. The role of the interdisciplinary team in subacute rehabilitation for central pontine myelinolysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;5:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrò RS, Cacciola A, Bertè F, et al. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? Neurol Sci. 2016;37(4):503–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maresca G, De Cola MC, Caliri S, et al. Moving towards novel multidisciplinary approaches for improving elderly quality of life: the emerging role of telemedicine in Sicily. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(5):318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cola MC, De Luca R, Bramanti A, et al. Tele-health services for the elderly: a novel southern Italy family needs-oriented model. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(6):356–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;1965(14):61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R. Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med. 1986;80(3):429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, et al. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;19(1):25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, et al. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63(3):118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, et al. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, et al. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996;67(3):588–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, et al. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10(1):20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach MS. Caring: the human mode of being, implications for nursing. Ottawa (Canada): The Canadian Hospital Association Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• King JD, Rosner MH. Osmotic demyelination syndrome. Am J Med Sci. 2010;339(6):561–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza A. Movement disorders and the osmotic demyelination syndrome. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19(8):709–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RJ. Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: the osmotic demyelination syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(3):iii22–iii28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murthy SB, Izadyar S, Dhamne M, et al. Osmotic demyelination syndrome: variable clinical and radiologic response to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(4):581–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KY, Lee IH, Kim GJ, et al. Plasma exchange successfully treats central pontine myelinolysis after acute hypernatremia from intravenous sodium bicarbonate therapy. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebedew DL. Is central pontine myelinolysis reversible? WMJ. 2016;115(6):326–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruni MF, Melegari C, De Cola MC, et al. What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;48:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò RS, Russo M, Naro A, et al. Robotic gait training in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: can virtual reality make the difference? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2017;377:25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò RS, De Cola MC, Leo A, et al. Robotic neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: psychological well-being beyond motor improvement. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(3):219–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portaro S, Russo M, Bramanti A, et al. The role of robotic gait training and tDCS in Friedrich ataxia rehabilitation: a case report. Medicine. 2019;98(8):e14447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straudi S, Benedetti MG, Venturini E, et al. Does robot-assisted gait training ameliorate gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis? A pilot randomized-control trial. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2013;33(4):555–563.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrò RS, Naro A, Russo M, et al. The role of virtual reality in improving motor performance as revealed by EEG: a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maggio MG, Torrisi M, Buda A, et al. Effects of robotic neurorehabilitation through lokomat plus virtual reality on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective case-control study. Int J Neurosci. 2020;130(2):117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirbagheri MM, Niu X, Kindig M, et al. The effects of locomotor training with a robotic-gait orthosis (Lokomat) on neuromuscular properties in persons with chronic SCI. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:3854–3857.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD006876.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar