Implementation of an assistive technology for meal preparation within a supported residence for adults with acquired brain injury: a mixed-methods single case study

References

• Funahashi S, Andreau JM. Prefrontal cortex and neural mechanisms of executive function. J Physiol Paris. 2013;107(6):471–482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zinn S, Bosworth HB, Hoenig HM, et al. Executive function deficits in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren C, Samuelsson H, Blomstrand C, et al. Long-term performance of instrumental activities of daily living in young and middleaged stroke survivors—impact of cognitive dysfunction, emotional problems and fatigue. Plos One. 2019;14(5):e0216822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, et al. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(10):1091–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn D, Dudley TK, Bosworth HB, et al. The effect of poststroke cognitive impairment on rehabilitation process and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7):1084–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty TA, Barker LA, Denniss R, et al. The cooking task: making a meal of executive functions. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:22–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbout L, Grenier MC, Braun CMJ, et al. Cognitive structure of executive deficits in patients with frontal lesions performing activities of daily living. Brain Inj. 2005;19(5):337–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanguay AN, Davidson PSR, Guerrero Nuñez KV, et al. Cooking breakfast after a brain injury. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8(272):272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville C, et al. The factorial validity and internal consistency of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile in individuals with a traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(2):177–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2015. WHO global disability action plan 2014–2021: better health for all people with disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Jack R, O’Neill B, et al. Technology to encourage meaningful activities following brain injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill B, Gillespie A. Assistive technology for cognition: a handbook for clinicians and developers. 1st ed. New York (NY): Psychology Press 2014. 196. p.
   Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Whelan BM, Wall K, et al. Acceptance of rehabilitation technology in adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(4):E67–E82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold A, Lourie A, Petras H, et al. The use of assistive technology for cognition to support the performance of daily activities for individuals with cognitive disabilities due to traumatic brain injury: the current state of the research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):359–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Ding D, Teodorski EE, et al. Use of assistive technology for cognition among people with traumatic brain injury: a survey study. Mil Med. 2016;181(6):560–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam J, Kim H. How assistive devices affect activities of daily living and cognitive functions of people with brain injury: a Meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(3):305–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström H, Hermansson L. Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettlewell J, das Nair R, Radford KA. A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(11):1705–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzicz F, Wang R, Begum M, et al. Speech interaction with personal assistive robots supporting aging at home for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2015;7(2):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailidis A, Boger JN, Craig T, et al. The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: an efficacy study. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8:28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Mahajan HP, Toto PE, et al. The feasibility of an automatic prompting system in assisting people with traumatic brain injury in cooking tasks. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(8):817–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz R, Wahl H, Matthews JT, et al. Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2015;55(5):724–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra S, Kulnik ST. Kitchen-related tasks used in occupational therapy during rehabilitation of adults with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brit J Occup Ther. 2021;84(1):22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pinard S, Bottari C, Laliberté C, et al. Design and usability evaluation of COOK, an assistive technology for meal preparation for persons with severe TBI. Disabil Rehabil Assit Technol. 2019;17:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux S, Bier N, Pigot H, et al. Cognitive assistance to meal preparation: design, implementation and, assessment in a living lab. AAAI 2015 spring workshop symposium, Ambient Intelligence For Health And Cognitive Enhancement, California USA. p. 14–16. Technical Report SS-15-01. Published by The AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA. March 23–25, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Olivares M, Pigot H, Bottari C, et al. Use of a persona to support the interdisciplinary design of an assistive technology for meal preparation in traumatic brain injury. Interact Comput. 2020;32(5-6):435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares M, Giroux S, De Loor P, et al. An ontology model for a context-aware preventive assistance system: reducing exposition of individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury to dangerous situations during meal preparation. 2nd IET International Conference on Technologies for Active and Assisted Living; London. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zarshenas S, Couture M, Bier N, et al. Potential advantages, barriers, and facilitators of implementing a cognitive orthosis for cooking for individuals with traumatic brain injury: the healthcare providers’ perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Journal. 2020;1–10. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2020.1833093
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon-Roy M, Bier N, Couture M, et al. Facilitators and obstacles to the use of a cognitive orthosis for meal preparation within the homes of adults with a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: informal caregivers and healthcare professionals’ perspectives. Assist Technol. 2021;1–8. DOI:10.1080/10400435.2020.1809552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaddaden A, Couture M, Gagnon-Roy M, et al. Using a cognitive orthosis to support older adults during meal preparation: Clinicians’ perspective on COOK technology. J Rehabil Assistive Technol Eng. 2020;7:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarshenas S, Gagnon-Roy M, Couture M, et al. Potential of using an assistive technology to address meal preparation difficulties following acquired brain injury: clients’ and caregivers’ perspectives. Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol. 2021;1–9. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2020.1867244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technology Readiness Levels. [cited 2021 Jan]. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/080.nsf/eng/00002.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario supportive housing framework-2017. [cited 2021 Jan]. http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=15986.
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Howse D, Krish B, et al. Living environments for people with moderate to severe acquired brain injury. Health Policy. 2010;5(4):e121–e38.
   Google Scholar
• Canada’s Health Care System. [cited 2021 June]. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-care-system/reports-publications/health-care-system/canada.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, et al. The Single-Case reporting guideline in Bhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: explanation and elaboration. Arch Sci Psychol. 2016;4(1):10–58.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(3):164–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Callen J, et al. Fit between individuals, tasks, technology, and environment (FITTE) framework: a proposed extension of FITT to evaluate and optimise health information technology use. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;21(264):744–748.
   Google Scholar
• Cup EHC, Scholte OP, Reimer WJM, et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean J. Rey auditory verbal learning test, rey AVLT. In: Kreutzer JS, DeLuca J, Caplan B, editors. Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. New York (NY): Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict R, Groninger L, Schretlen D, et al. Revision of the brief visuospatial memory test: studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(2):145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 4th ed. San Antonio (TX): Pearson; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mesulam MM. Principles of Behavioral Neurology (No. 26). New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(2):203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer J. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Shewan CM, Kertesz A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;45(3):308–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas JM, Flaherty C, Snow PC. Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology. 2000;14(3):251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville C, et al. The criterion-related validity of the IADL Profile with measures of executive functions, indices of trauma severity, and sociodemographic characteristics. Brain Inj. 2009;23(4):322–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville C, et al. A generalizability study of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile. Arch Phys Med RehabIil. 2010;91(5):734–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Training use of compensatory memory books: a three stage behavioral approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;11(6):871–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeault H, Gagnon L, Pigot H, et al. Impact of AP@LZ in the daily life of three persons with Alzheimer’s disease: long-term use and further exploration of its effectiveness. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(5):755–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin V, Korner-Bitensky N, Dawson DR, et al. Efficacy of executive function interventions after stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(2):158–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Gosselin N, Guillemette M, et al. Independence in managing one’s finances after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25(13–14):1306–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, et al. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):386–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fydrich T, Dowdall D, Chambless DL. Reliability and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. J Anxiety Disord. 1992;6(1):55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly G, Simpson GK, Brown S, et al. The Overt Behaviour Scale-Self-Report (OBS-SR) for acquired brain injury: exploratory analysis of reliability and validity. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(5):704–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, Batur EB, Yuksel S, et al. Validity and reliability of Fatigue Severity Scale in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26(2):122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmond M, Fleming J. Reliability of the Self-Awareness of Deficits Interview for adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17(4):325–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbüchel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, QOLIBRI Task Force, et al. Quality of life after brain injury (QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(7):1157–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer J, et al. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8(2):75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Borelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Pub Health. 2011;71:S52–S63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock J, Horner R, et al. Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial Spec Educ. 2013;34(1):26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JD, Gast DL. Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):445–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker R, Vannest KJ, Davis JL, et al. Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behav Ther. 2011;42(2):284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman AM, Salsana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barker LA, Andrade J, Romanowski CAJ. CA. R. Impaired implicit cognition with intact executive function after extensive bilateral prefrontal pathology: a case study. Neurocase. 2004;10(3):233–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice TIM, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain Injury. 1991;114(2):727–741.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke JM, Berry E, Graham-Wisener L, et al. Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 psychological wellbeing study. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar