Usability of a virtual reality manual wheelchair simulator

References

• Smith EM, Giesbrecht EM, Ben Mortenson W, et al. Prevalence of wheelchair and scooter use among community-dwelling Canadians. Phys Ther. 2016;96(8):1135–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warms CA, Whitney JD, Belza B. Measurement and description of physical activity in adult manual wheelchair users. Disabil Health J. 2008;1(4):236–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Ferretti E, Oyster M, et al. The relationship between wheelchair mobility patterns and community participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technol. 2011;23(3):177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini SM, Oyster ML, Kirby RL, et al. Manual wheelchair skills capacity predicts quality of life and community integration in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(12):2237–2243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EM, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):361–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best KL, Routhier F, Miller WC. A description of manual wheelchair skills training: current practices in canadian rehabilitation centers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(5):393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Backman CL, et al. Association between mobility, participation, and wheelchair-related factors in long-term care residents who use wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(7):1310–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyster ML, Karmarkar AM, Patrick M, et al. Investigation of factors associated with manual wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):484–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Saray P, Peláez-Ballestas I, Ramos-Lira L, et al. Usage problems and social barriers faced by persons with a wheelchair and other aids. Qualitative study from the ergonomics perspective in persons disabled by rheumatoid arthritis and other conditions. Reumatol Clin. 2013;9(1):24–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper RA, Ding D, Simpson R, et al. Virtual reality and computer-enhanced training applied to wheeled mobility: an overview of work in pittsburgh. Assist Technol. 2005;17(2):159–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlati S, Colombo V, Ferrigno G, et al. Virtual reality-based wheelchair simulators: a scoping review. Assist Technol. 2020;32(6):294–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrzak E, Pullman S, McGuire A. Using virtual reality and videogames for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a structured literature review. Games Health J. 2014;3(4):202–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose T, Nam CS, Chen KB. Immersion of virtual reality for rehabilitation – review. Appl Ergon. 2018;69:153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlozzi NE, Gade V, Rizzo AS, et al. Using virtual reality driving simulators in persons with spinal cord injury: three screen display versus head mounted display. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(2):176–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John NW, Pop SR, Day TW, et al. The implementation and validation of a virtual environment for training powered wheelchair manoeuvres. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018;24(5):1867–1878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devigne L, Babel M, Nouviale F, et al. Design of an immersive simulator for assisted power wheelchair driving. International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan HP, Dicianno BE, Cooper RA, et al. Assessment of wheelchair driving performance in a virtual reality-based simulator. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(4):322–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault PS, Blackburn E, Reid D, et al. Development and user validation of driving tasks for a power wheelchair simulator. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1549–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaer A, Regenbrecht H, O'Hare D. Immersion factors affecting perception and behaviour in a virtual reality power wheelchair simulator. Appl Ergon. 2017;58:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor TJ, Fitzgerald SG, Cooper RA, et al. Does computer game play aid in motivation of exercise and increase metabolic activity during wheelchair ergometry? Med Eng Phys. 2001;23(4):267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin M, Lalumiere M, Gagnon DH, et al. Characterization of the immediate effect of a training session on a manual wheelchair simulator with haptic biofeedback: towards more effective propulsion. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23(1):104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richir S, Pineau S, Monacelli E, et al. Design of portable and accessible platform in charge of wheelchair feedback immersion. 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR); 2015. 23–27 March 2015. p. 389–390.
   Google Scholar
• Pouvrasseau F, Monacelli E, Charles S, et al. Discussion about functionalities of the Virtual Fauteuil simulator for wheelchair training environment. 2017 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR); 2017. 19–22 June 2017. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Alapakkam Govindarajan MA, Laplante-El Haili Y, Archambault PS. User validation of a portable manual wheelchair simulator. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. DOI:10.1177/20556683211067174
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Miguel Cruz A, Rios Rincon A, et al. What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(5):447–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccione J, Collett J, De Foe A. Virtual skills training: the role of presence and agency. Heliyon. 2019;5(11):e02583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, et al. The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriat Psychiatry. 2000;15(11):1021–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi-Shahri M. Reliability and validity of Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ). Int J Behav Sci. 2009;3:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kizony R, Katz N, Weiss PL. Adapting an immersive virtual reality system for rehabilitation. J Visual Comput Animat. 2003;14(5):261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertoff DB, Goldiez B, LaViola JJ. Virtual experience test: a virtual environment evalutation questionnaire. Conference: IEEE Virtual Reality 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison CS, Grant PM, Conway BA. Haptic interfaces for wheelchair navigation in the built environment. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 2004;13(5):520–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruder G, Interrante V, Phillips L, et al. Redirecting walking and driving for natural navigation in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2012;18(4):538–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebenitsch L, Owen C. Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality. 2016;20(2):101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmisano S, Allison RS, Kim J. Cybersickness in head-mounted displays is caused by differences in the user’s virtual and physical head pose. Front Virtual Real. 2020;1:698.
   Google Scholar