130
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The development of assistive product policies in China from the perspective of the assistive product industry

, , , &
Pages 1266-1280 | Received 27 Nov 2021, Accepted 30 Oct 2022, Published online: 11 Nov 2022

References

  • National Research Center for Rehabilitation Technical Aids. Assistive products for persons with disability-Classification and terminology. China: Standards Press of China. 2016. p. 1–2.
  • Wang H, Xu XM. Assistive products for persons with disability and supply service. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2007;04:321–323.
  • Zhu K, Li CQ. International experience and inspiration in financing assistive products for persons with disabilities. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2011;17:1090–1092.
  • North Carolina Assistive Technology Program State Agencies Related to Assistive Technology; [cited 2012 May 25]. Available from: http://www.ncatp.org.
  • Martina E, Ewa W. Everyday technology and 86-year-old individuals in Sweden. Disab Rehabil. 2011;06:123–129.
  • Agree Emily M, Freedman Vicki A. A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1780–1788.
  • Wan H, Larsen LJ. Elderly Americans with a disability: 2008–2012. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2014.
  • Damodaran L, Olphert W. User responses to assisted living technologies (ALTs)- a review of the literature. J Integr Care. 2010;18(2):25–32.
  • Loïc G, et al. Medical and assistive health technology: meeting the needs of aging populations. The Gerontologist. 2016;56:293–302.
  • Zara T, et al. More than just assistive devices: how a South African social enterprise supports an environment of inclusion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:2655–2655.
  • Zhang X, Chen G. Use and needs of assistive products in the background of aging: current situation and research progress. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2016;22:1350–1353.
  • Jiang MD, Dai FM, Xu JJ, et al. Current status of mobility products usage in the elderly and influencing factors. J Nurs Sci. 2019;34:23–27.
  • Lai Q, Ouyang Q, Tu QL, et al. Survey on assistive products utilization for elderly supported by community-based homecare in Dongcheng, Beijing. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2019;25:234–238.
  • Luo YM, Shi F, Ji SR. Advances in the application of geriatric assistive products and assistive technologies in elderly rehabilitation. Chin J Rehabil Med. 2016;31:813–816.
  • Lai Q, Li G, Fang X, et al. Construction of professional training system of assistive technology: in perspective of ICF. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2018;24:367–372.
  • Dong LQ, Li X, Xu J, et al. Construction of a professional training system of assistive product: in perspective of ICF. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. 2019;25:724–728.
  • Li GQ, Yu SJ, Meng YC, et al. Research on construction of cloud platform for assistive product service. Chin Health Service Manage. 2019;36 5–8 + 16.
  • Qiao XL, Song HH. The assistive product design for disabled considering interpersonal sensitivity characteristic. Packag Eng. 2014;35:33–36.
  • Yang LX, Li H. Research on social welfare policy of assistive products for persons with disabilities in China. Disab Res. 2018;01:43–51.
  • Li XY, Sun M, Wan SH, et al. Analysis of the provision and utilization of free assistive products for disabled persons in shanghai. Med Soc. 2020;33:35–39.
  • Yang YH, Han WW, Tang LY, et al. Study on the current situation of rehabilitation service supply in elderly institutions in changchun. Chin J Rehabil Med. 2020;35:333–337.
  • Huang C, Ren T, Zhang J. Policy documents quantitative research: a new direction for public policy study. J Public Manag. 2015;02:129–137.
  • Wu B, Liu WW. Quantitative research on the policy texts of China’s pension service industry (1994–2016). Reform Econ Sys. 2017;04:20–26.
  • Rothwell R, Zegveld W. Reindusdalization and technology. London: Logman Group Limited. 1985; p. 3–104.
  • World Bank. World development indicators 2011. Washington D.C., USA: World Bank; 2011.
  • Yin DH. Assistive product industry policy system and outlook in China. China Civil Affairs. 2019;2019(21):49–50.
  • Aghion P, Cai J, Dewatripont M, et al. Industrial policy and competition. Am Econ J. 2015;7(4):1–32.
  • Peters M, Schneider M, Griesshaber T, et al. The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – does the locus of policies matter? Res Policy. 2012;41(8):1296–1308.
  • Wan RY. Government procurement: the Keynesian tap. China Government Procurement. 2012;34:68–71.
  • Zhang X. Theoretic basis for public service supply: systematic distinction and framework construction. J Sichuan Univ. 2015;04:135–140.
  • Gao HY. Microeconomics. Beijing: China Renmin University Press; 2005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.