Laboratory investigation on liquefaction of sands and cemented sand mixes

References

• ASTM D5311M-13, 2013. Standard Test Method for Load Controlled Cyclic Triaxial Strength of Soil. 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., Puppala, A.J., and Hoyos, L.R., 2022. Liquefaction assessment in unsaturated soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 148 (9), 04022067. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R.W., et al. 2012. Guidelines for Estimation of Shear Wave Velocity Profiles. PEER Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters at the University of California: 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, R.W., Mejia, L.H., and Idriss, I.M., 1997. Liquefaction at Moss Landing during Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123 (5), 453–467. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(453).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabortty, P., Roshan, A.R., and Das, A., 2020. Evaluation of dynamic properties of partially saturated sands using cyclic triaxial tests. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 50 (6), 948–962. doi:10.1007/s40098-020-00433-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, G.W., et al., 1989. Influence of cementation on liquefaction of sands. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 115 (8), 1102–1117. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:8(1102).
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, N.C., Rotta, G.V., and Prietto, P.D.M., 2000. Influence of curing under stress on the triaxial response of cemented soils. Geotechnique, 50 (1), 99–105. doi:10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’appolonia, E., Miller, C.E., Jr, and Ware, T.M., 1955. Sand compaction by vibroflotation. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 120 (1), 154–168. doi:10.1061/TACEAT.0007147.
   Google Scholar
• Dobry, R., et al., 1982. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. In: National Bureau of standards, Department of Commerce Washington, D.C. Gaithersburg, MD: , Vol. 138, 150.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, S.R., Dey, A.K., and Selvam, S., 1999. Densification of pond ash by blasting. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125 (10), 889–899. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:10(889).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J.T. and Airey, D.W., 1998. Properties of artificially cemented carbonate sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124 (6), 492–499. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(492).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Standards, 1980. IS: 2720 (Part III, Sec 1) – 1980 (reaffirmed 2002). Determination of Specific gravity – fine grained soils.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Standards, 1983. IS 2720 (Part 14) – 1983. Determination of relative density of cohesion less soils.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Standards, 1985. IS 2720 (Part 4) – 1985 (reaffirmed 2006). Grain size analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Standards, 2002. IS 1893 (Part 1) – 2002. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, K., 1996. Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, A., Mittal, S., and Shukla, S.K., 2022. Cyclic behaviour of stratified soil under liquefied states. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 1–22. doi:10.1080/1064119X.2022.2095946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karol, R.H., 1968. Chemical grouting technology. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 94 (1), 175–204. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001082.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M.M., et al., 2020. Seismic hazard curves for warangal city in peninsular India. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21 (3), 543–554. doi:10.1007/s42107-019-00210-5.
   Google Scholar
• Knittel, L., et al., 2020. Pure elastic stiffness of sand represented by response envelopes derived from cyclic triaxial tests with local strain measurements. Acta Geotechnica, 15 (8), 2075–2088. doi:10.1007/s11440-019-00893-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.S., Dey, A., and Krishna, A.M., 2020a. Liquefaction potential assessment of Brahmaputra sand based on regular and irregular excitations using stress-controlled cyclic triaxial test. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24 (4), 1070–1082. doi:10.1007/s12205-020-0216-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.S., Murali Krishna, A., and Dey, A., 2020b. Assessment of dynamic response of cohesionless soil using strain-controlled and stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38 (2), 1431–1450. doi:10.1007/s10706-019-01100-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummeneje, O. and Eide, O., 1961. Investigation of loose sand deposits by blasting. Proc., 5th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, ISSMFE, London, pp.491–497.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. and Mitchell, R., 1988. Effects of reinforcing elements on the behavior of weakly cemented sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 25 (2), 389–395. doi:10.1139/t88-040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyman, A.K.B., 1942. Compaction of cohesionless foundation soils by explosives. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 107 (1), 1330–1341. doi:10.1061/TACEAT.0005509.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, L. and Broise, Y., 1975. Theoretical and practical aspect of dynamic consolidation. Geotechnique, 25 (1), 3–18. doi:10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nong, Z.Z., Park, S.S., and Lee, D.E., 2021. Comparison of sand liquefaction in cyclic triaxial and simple shear tests. Soils and Foundations, 61 (4), 1071–1085. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2021.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, J.W., O’rourke, T.D., and Stewart, H.E., 1995. Liquefaction hazards in the San Francisco Bay region: site investigation, modeling, and hazard assessment at areas most seriously affected by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Ithaca, New York: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Porcino, D., Marcianò, V., and Granata, R., 2011. Undrained cyclic response of a silicate-grouted sand for liquefaction mitigation purposes. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, Taylor and Francis Group, 6 (3), 155–170. doi:10.1080/17486025.2011.560287.
   Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy, K., Boominathan, A., and Rajagopal, K., 2010. Influence of initial conditions on liquefaction resistance of silty sands. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, 5 (3), 199–211. doi:10.1080/17486021003706572.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K.R. and Saxena, S.K., 1992. Liquefaction resistance of cemented sands under multidirectional cyclic loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 29 (6), 989–993. doi:10.1139/t92-108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, G.A., Seed, H.B., and Migliaccio, R.R., 1969. Bridge foundation behavior in Alaska earthquake. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 95 (4), 1007–1036. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001302.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, S.K., Avramidis, A.S., and Reddy, K.R., 1988. Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cemented sands at low strains. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 25 (2), 353–368. doi:10.1139/t88-036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., Arango, I., and Chan, C.K. 1975. Evaluation of Soil Liquefaction Potential during Earthquakes. Report No. EERC 75-28, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B., 1979. Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 105 (2), 201–255. doi:10.1061/AJGEB6.0000768.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M., 1967. Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 93 (3), 83–108. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000981.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M., 1971. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97 (9), 1249–1273. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
   Google Scholar
• Shinde, N.S. and Kumar, J., 2022. Assessing the liquefaction potential of a sand specimen by using resonant column test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 159, 107343. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, M.L., et al., 1976. Cyclic triaxial strength of standard test sand. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 102 (5), 511–523. doi:10.1061/AJGEB6.0000272.
   Google Scholar
• Sitharam, T.G., Govinda Raju, L., and Srinivasa Murthy, B.R., 2004. Cyclic and monotonic undrained shear response of silty sand from Bhuj region in India. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 41 (2–4), 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J.P., 1986. In situ testing for ground modification techniques. In: ASCE geotechnical special publication No. 6. use of in situ tests in geotechnical engineering. Reston, VA, USA: ASCE, 322–335.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., et al., 2021. Effect of the loading frequency on the sand liquefaction behaviour in cyclic triaxial tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 147, 106779. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar