Stress-history impact on yielding, shear and energy dissipation response of earthen dam soil under static and cyclic loading conditions

References

• Abdulhadi, N.O., Germaine, J.T., and Whittle, A.J. 2012. Stress-dependent behavior of saturated clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49 (8), 907–916. doi:10.1139/t2012-057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abhijith, T.K., Hussain, M., and Sachan, A. 2020. “Effect of stress history on stress–strain and volumetric response of laterite soil under undrained and drained conditions.” In the Proceedings of the Symposium on International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG Symposium 2019), 1, 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for consolidated undrained cyclic direct simple shear test under constant volume with load control or displacement control. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; D8296–8319.
   Google Scholar
• Budhu, M. 1984. On comparing simple shear and triaxial test results. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 110 (12), 1809–1814. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:12(1809).
   Google Scholar
• Castro, G. 1975. Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sands. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 101 (6), 551–569. doi:10.1061/AJGEB6.0000173.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro, A., Presti, D.C.L., and Maugeri, M., 2001. The degradation behaviour of Fabriano soil during cyclic loading. Rivista Italiana Di Geotecnica, 2, 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Della, N., Arab, A., and Belkhatir, M. 2011. Laboratory investigation on the effects of overconsolidation and saturation on undrained monotonic shear behavior of granular material. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 29 (3), 218–229. doi:10.1080/1064119X.2011.555708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyvik, R., et al. 1987. Comparison of truly undrained and constant volume direct simple shear tests. Géotechnique, 37 (1), 3–10. doi:10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahoum, K., Aggour, M.S., and Amini, F. 1996. Dynamic properties of cohesive soils treated with lime. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122 (5), 382–389. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:5(382).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Noonan, M.L., and Lew, K.V. 1983. Yield states and stress–strain relationships in a natural plastic clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20 (3), 502–516. doi:10.1139/t83-058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanzawa, H. 1980. Undrained strength and stability analysis for a quick sand. Soils and Foundations, 20 (2), 17–29. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.20.2_17.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. and Sachan, A. 2019a. Dynamic behaviour of Kutch soils under cyclic triaxial and cyclic simple shear testing conditions. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14 (8), 1–17. doi:10.1080/19386362.2019.1608715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. and Sachan, A. 2019b. Effect of loading conditions and stress history on cyclic behavior of Kutch soil. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 15 (4), 233–251. doi:10.1080/17486025.2019.1635716.
   Google Scholar
• Igwe, O., Fukuoka, H., and Sassa, K. 2012. The effect of relative density and confining stress on shear properties of sands with varying grading. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30 (5), 1207–1229. doi:10.1007/s10706-012-9533-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, K. and Okada, S. 1978. Yielding of overconsolidated sand and liquefaction model under cyclic stresses. Soils and Foundations, 18 (1), 57–72. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.18.57.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F., and Yasuda, S. 1975. Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses. Soils and Foundations, 15 (1), 29–44. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.15.29.
   Google Scholar
• Kammerer, A.M., et al. 2001. “Use of cyclic simple shear testing in evaluation of the deformation potential of liquefiable soils”. In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Rolla, Missouri, USA. Paper No.16: 1–7. Rolla: University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S.L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, C.C. and Foott, R. 1974. New design procedure for stability of soft clays. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 100 (7), 763–786. doi:10.1061/AJGEB6.0000066.
   Google Scholar
• Lade, P.V. 1990. Single-hardening model with application to NC clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 116 (3), 394–414. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:3(394).
   Google Scholar
• Lade, P.V. and Yamamuro, J.A. 1997. Effects of nonplastic fines on static liquefaction of sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34 (6), 918–928. doi:10.1139/t97-052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, K.N. and Ghayoomi, M. 2017. Cyclic direct simple shear test to measure strain-dependent dynamic properties of unsaturated sand. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 40 (3), 381–395. doi:10.1520/GTJ20160128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, Y., et al. 2018. Laboratory study on undrained shear behaviour of overconsolidated sand–silt mixtures: effect of the fines content and stress state. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12 (2), 118–132. doi:10.1080/19386362.2016.1252140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, Y., et al. 2019. Packing Density and Overconsolidation Ratio Effects on the Mechanical Response of Granular Soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38 (1), 723–742. doi:10.1007/s10706-019-01061-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manmatharajan, V. and Sivathayalan, S. 2011. “Effect of overconsolidation on cyclic resistance correction factors Kσ and Kα.” In the Proceedings of Fourteenth Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering and the Sixty-Fourth Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J.K. and Soga, K. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behaviorVol. 3. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.J. 1970. On the yielding and mechanical strength of Leda clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 7 (3), 297–312. doi:10.1139/t70-036.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, M. and Sachan, A. 2008. “Evolution of dilatancy angle during shearing of kaolin clay with different microfabrics”. In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India. 805–812.
   Google Scholar
• Nagase, H., et al. 2004. “Effects of overeconsolidation on liquefaction strength characteristics of sand samples under ko-stress condition.” In the Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Nagase, H., et al. 2000. “Effects of overconsolidation on liquefaction strength of sandy soil samples.” In the Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zeland. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nong, Z.Z., Park, S.S., and Lee, D.E. 2021. Comparison of sand liquefaction in cyclic triaxial and simple shear tests. Soils and Foundations, 61 (4), 1071–1085. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2021.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, W.H. and Seed, H.B. 1968. Sand liquefaction under cyclic loading simple shear conditions. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 94 (3), 689–708. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001135.
   Google Scholar
• Polito, C.P. and Martin, J.R., II. 2001. Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127 (5), 408–415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prashant, A. and Penumadu, D. 2005. Effect of overconsolidation and anisotropy of kaolin clay using true triaxial testing. Soils and Foundations, 45 (3), 71–82. doi:10.3208/sandf.45.3_71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prashant, A. and Penumadu, D. 2015. Uncoupled dual hardening model for clays considering the effect of overconsolidation and intermediate principal stress. Acta Geotechnica, 10 (5), 607–622. doi:10.1007/s11440-015-0377-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran, C.P. and Rajendran, K. 2001. Characteristics of deformation and past seismicity associated with the 1819 Kutch earthquake, northwestern India. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91 (3), 407–426. doi:10.1785/0119990162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravishankar, B.V., Sitharam, T.G., and Govindaraju, L. 2005. “Dynamic properties of Ahmedabad sands at large strains”. In Proc., Ind. Geotechnical Conf, Ahmedabad, India. 369–372.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, K.H., Schofield, A., and Thurairajah, A. 1963. Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical. Géotechnique, 13 (3), 211–240. doi:10.1680/geot.1963.13.3.211.
   Google Scholar
• Saglam, S. and Bakır, B.S., 2014. Cyclic response of saturated silts. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61-62, 164–175. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahsavari, M. and Sivathayalan, S. 2014. “Effect of overconsolidation and the direction of initial static shear stress on the liquefaction susceptibility of sand”. In Proc., 67th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Regina, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sheahan, T.C., Ladd, C.C., and Germaine, J.T. 1996. Rate-dependent undrained shear behavior of saturated clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122 (2), 99–108. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(99).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Roy, D., and Jain, S.K. 2005. “Investigation of liquefaction failure in earthen dams during Bhuj Earthquake”. In Proc., special session on seismic aspects of Dam Design, 5th international R&D conference. 40–48. Bangalore, India
   Google Scholar
• Sitharam, T.G., Govindaraju, L., and Sridharan, A. 2004. Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of soils. Current Science, 87 (10), 1370–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitharam, T.G., Govindaraju, L., and Srinivasa Murthy, B.R. 2004. Cyclic and monotonic undrained shear response of silty sand from Bhuj region in India. ISET Journal of Earthquake Tech, 41 (2–4), 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Strozyk, J. 2017. “The laboratory study of shear strength of the overconsolidated and quasi-overconsolidated fine-grained soil.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Dnipro, Ukraine. 95(2), 022055.
   Google Scholar
• Stróżyk, J. and Tankiewicz, M., 2014. The undrained shear strength of overconsolidated clays. Procedia Engineering, 91, 317–321. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.067
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, F. and Ishihara, K. 1974. Yielding of sand in triaxial compression. Soils and Foundations, 14 (2), 63–76. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.14.2_63.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, F., et al. 1986. Some factors affecting cyclic undrained triaxial strength of sand. Soils and Foundations, 26 (3), 99–116. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.26.3_99.
   Google Scholar
• Tavenas, F., et al. 1979. The use of strain energy as a yield and creep criterion for lightly overconsolidated clays. Géotechnique, 29 (3), 285–303. doi:10.1680/geot.1979.29.3.285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tint, K., Rae Lee, S., and Su Kim, Y. 2009. Comparison between shear behaviors of over consolidated Nakdong river sandy silt and silty sand. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 27 (3), 217–229. doi:10.1080/10641190902967101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle, M.P., et al. 2002. Observations and comparisons of liquefaction features and related effects induced by the Bhuj earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 18 (1_suppl), 79–100. doi:10.1193/1.2803908.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, H., et al. 2004. Liquefaction-induced ground failure: a study of the Chi-Chi earthquake cases. Engineering Geology, 71 (1–2), 141–155. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00130-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. and Gong, X. 2001. Strain degradation of saturated clay under cyclic loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38 (1), 208–212. doi:10.1139/t00-062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar