Two International Propaganda Models: Comparing RT and CGTN’s 2020 US Election Coverage

References

• Al Jazeera. 2021. “Al Jazeera Announces Launch of New Digital Platform, Rightly.” Al Jazeera, 24 February. https://bit.ly/3xQbP0t.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. 2002. “Regimenting the Public Mind: The Modernization of Propaganda in the PRC.” International Journal 57 (4): 563. doi:10.2307/40203692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. 2008. Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, A.-M. 2015. “Authoritarianism Goes Global (II): China’s Foreign Propaganda Machine.” Journal of Democracy 26 (4): 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E., and B. Carter. 2021. “Questioning More: RT, Outward-Facing Propaganda, and the Post-West World Order.” Security Studies 30 (1): 49–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charon, P., and J.-B. Jeangene Vilmer. 2021. “Chinese Influence Operations: A Machiavellian Moment.” https://www.irsem.fr/report.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cmiel, K. 1990. Democratic Eloquence: The Fight Over Popular Speech in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Crilley, R., and P. Chatterje-Doody. 2020. “From Russia with Lols: Humour, RT, and the Legitimation of Russian Foreign Policy.” Global Society. https://bit.ly/3zpPnf7.
   Google Scholar
• DePetris, D. 2020. “Trump’s Debate Clash with Biden was a National Embarrassment.” Spectator. https://bit.ly/3y0lSA8.
   Google Scholar
• DiResta, R. 2020. Telling China’s Story: The Chinese Communist Party’s Campaign to Shape Global Narratives. Hoover Institute. https://bit.ly/3oilpoX.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, J. 1973. Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Elswah, M., and P. Howard. 2020. “‘Anything That Causes Chaos’: The Organizational Behavior of Russia Today (RT).” Journal of Communication 70 (5): 623–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUvsDisinfo. 2019. “Figure of the Week: 1.3 Billion.” https://euvsdisinfo.eu/figure-of-the- week-1-3-billion.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, O. 2021. “‘Information War’ – The Russian Strategy That Blends Diplomacy and War.” In New Perspectives on Diplomacy: Contemporary Diplomacy in Action, edited by J. Spence, C. Yorke, and A. Masser, 143–164. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Galleotti, M. 2019. Russian Political War: Moving Beyond the Hybrid. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, F. 2015. “Communicating China to the World: Confucius Institutes and China’s Strategic Narratives.” Politics 35 (3–4): 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, E., and N. Chomsky. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, R. S., S. C. Cooley, and R. Kluver. 2020. Global Media and Strategic Narratives of Contested Democracy: Chinese Russian and Arabic Media Narratives of the US Presidential Election. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. 2011. “From the World's Largest Propaganda Machine to a Multipurposed Global News Agency: Factors in and Implications of Xinhua's Transformation Since 1978.” Political Communication 28 (3): 377–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., and D. Ji. 2012. “Ambiguities in Communicating with the World: The ‘Going-Out’ Policy of China's Media and its Multilayered Contexts.” Chinese Journal of Communication 5 (1): 32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., D. Ji, and Y. Gong. 2018. “From the Outside In: CCTV Going Global in a New World Communication Order.” In China’s Media Go Global, edited by D. Thussu, H. De Burgh, and A. Shi, 67–78. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. 2018. Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President – What We Don’t, Can’t, and Do Know. New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, G., and V. O’Donnell. 2012. Propaganda and Persuasion. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kohring, M., and J. Matthews. 2007. “Trust in News Media: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale.” Communication Research 34 (2): 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach, B., and T. Rosenstiel. 2001. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.-T. 2010. “Why They Don’t Trust the Media: An Examination of Factors Predicting Trust.” American Behavioral Scientist 54 (1): 8–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and D. Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, F. 2019. “The New Silk Road on Facebook: How China’s Official Media Cover and Frame a National Initiative for Global Audiences.” Communication and the Public 4 (4): 261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D., and P. Surowiec. 2020. “Content Analysis and the Examination of Digital Propaganda on Social Media.” In The SAGE Handbook of Propaganda, edited by P. Baines, N. O’Shaughnessy, and N. Snow, 171–188. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid-Morales, D. 2021. “Who Set the Narrative? Assessing the Influence of Chinese Media in News Coverage of COVID-19 in 30 African Countries.” Global Media and China 6 (2): 129–151.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, V. 2018. “Evaluating China’s Global Media Expansion.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 13(1), https://www.westminsterpapers.org/article/id/262.
   Google Scholar
• Miazhevich, G. 2018. “Nation Branding in the Post-Broadcast era: The Case of RT.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 21 (5): 575–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N. 2020. Reuters Digital News Report 2020. https://bit.ly/3wPi8jH.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, S. 2020. “Sharing a Playbook? The Convergence of Russian and U.S. Narratives about Joe Biden.” APSA Preprints. https://bit.ly/2UyemxV.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., and H. Joffe. 2020. “Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. doi:10.1177/1609406919899220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, W. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky, A. 2017. The Invention of Russia: The Rise of Putin and the Age of Fake News. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pasti, S. 2005. “Two Generations of Contemporary Russian Journalists.” European Journal of Communication 20 (1): 89–115. doi:10.1177/0267323105049634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, G., and S. Robertshaw. 2018. Weaponising News: RT, Sputnik and Targeted Disinformation. Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power, King’s College London. https://bit.ly/36SXy7g.
   Google Scholar
• Rawnsley, G. D. 2015. “To Know us is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China.” Politics 35 (3–4): 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rid, T. 2020. Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, D., and J. Arquilla. 2020. Whose Story Wins: The Rise of the Noosphere, Noopolitik & Information-Age Statecraft. RAND. https://bit.ly/3hTGS5Q.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. 2010. The View from Nowhere: Questions and Answers. PressThink. https://bit.ly/3ivJSES.
   Google Scholar
• RSF [Reporters Without Borders]. 2019. China’s Pursuit of a New World Media Order. https://bit.ly/3Bqpk9n.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, P., and A. Kazantsev. 2016. “‘The Limits of Russia’s “Soft Power”’.” Journal of Political Power 9 (3): 395–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, F., T. Peterson, and W. Schramm. 1956. Four Theories of the Press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spring, M. 2020. “Stop the Steal: The Deep Roots of Trump’s ‘Voter Fraud’ Strategy.” BBC, 23 November. https://bbc.in/3isaaHY.
   Google Scholar
• Sudworth, J. 2020. “US 2020 Election: Who Does China Really Want To Win?” BBC News, 19 October, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54522988.
   Google Scholar
• Thussu, D., H. De Burgh, and A. Shi. 2017. China’s Media Go Global. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2020. Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 US Election. https://bit.ly/3eKs0Fq.
   Google Scholar
• Varrall, M. 2020. Behind The News: Inside China Global Television Network. Lowy Institute. https://bit.ly/3Bsh8W0.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, Y. 2019. “Disinformation, Performed: Self-Presentation of a Russian IRA Account on Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (11): 1646–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yablokov, I. 2015. “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT).” Politics 35 (3–4): 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M. 2022. “Al Jazeera Winds Down Rightly, its Conservative US Media Project – Report.” The Guardian, 19 January. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/jan/19/al-jazeera-rightly-conservative- media.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., X. Wang, and Y. Hu. 2021. “Strategic Framing Matters But Varies: A Structural Topic Modeling Approach to Analyzing China’s Foreign Propaganda About the 2019 Hong Kong Protests on Twitter.” Social Science Computer Review, doi:10.1177/08944393211042575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., and Y. Xiang. 2018. “Does China’s Outward Focused Journalism Engage a Constructive Approach? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Xinhua News Agency’s English News.” Asian Journal of Communication 29 (4): 346–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar