The Nature, Value, and Experience of Engagement in Pediatric Rehabilitation: Perspectives of Youth, Caregivers, and Service Providers

References

• Hock R, Priester MA, Iachini AL, Browne T, DeHart D, Clone S. A review of family engagement measures for adolescent substance use services. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24(12):3700–10. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0178-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetley A, Jinks M, Huband N, Howells K. A systematic review of measures of therapeutic engagement in psychosocial and psychological treatment. J Clin Psychol. 2011;67:927–41. doi:10.1002/jclp.v67.9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Rezze B, Law M, Eva K, Pollock N, Gorter JW. Development of a generic fidelity measure for rehabilitation intervention research for children with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(8):737–44. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kovarsky D. Engagement in clinical interaction: an introduction. Semin Speech Lang. 2009;30(1):5–10. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1104529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoagwood KE. Family-based services in children’s mental health: A research review and synthesis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005;46(7):690–713. doi:10.1111/jcpp.2005.46.issue-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor MC. The particularities of engagement: intersubjectivity in occupational therapy practice. OTJR. 2012;32:151–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagatell N. Engaged moments: mediated action and children with autism in the classroom setting. OTJR. 2012;32:258–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole A, Kim H, Lotz K, Munson MR. Exploring the perceptions of workers on young adult mental health service (dis)engagement. Social Work Ment Health. 2016;14(2):133–48. doi:10.1080/15332985.2015.1022244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S. Adolescent engagement in mental health services. Canterbury, UK: Canterbury Christ Church University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, McPherson KM. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–54. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.933899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Petersen P. Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: a motivational framework. Child Adoles Ment Health. 2014;9(1):2–8. doi:10.1111/camh.12015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Munson MR, McKay MM. Engagement in mental health treatment among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Child Adoles Social Work J. 2012;29:241–66. doi:10.1007/s10560-012-0256-2.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(1):59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastergeorge AM A tool for assessing engagement in instructional contexts. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2009;30:48–56. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1104534.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday SE, Calkins SD, Leerkes EM. Measuring preschool learning engagement in the laboratory. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018;167:93–116. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Chiarello LA, Thompson L, McLarnon MJW, Smart E, Ziviani J, Pinto M. Development of an observational measure of therapy engagement for pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AJ. Part II commentary: motivation and engagement: conceptual, operational, and empirical clarity. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, editors. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York (NY): Springer; 2012. p. 303–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard ER. The trilogy of mind: cognition, affection, and conation. J Hist Behav Sci. 1980;16:107–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Imms C, Stewart D, Freeman M, Nguyen T. A transactional framework for pediatric rehabilitation: shifting the focus to situated contexts, transactional processes, and adaptive developmental outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1829–41. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1309583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G. The role of the therapist in therapeutic change: how knowledge from mental health can inform pediatric rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;37(2):121–38. doi:10.1080/01942638.2016.1185508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsof WM, Wynne LC. Toward progress research: closing the gap between family therapy practice and research. J Marital Fam Ther. 2000;26:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Duffee DE, Steinke C, Larkin H. Youth engagement and service dosage in a mandated setting: A study of residential treatment centers. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(9):1515–26. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Coster W, Khetani MA. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(8):639–48. doi:10.1080/09638280701400375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M. Participation–challenges in conceptualization, measurement and intervention. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(4):470–73. doi:10.1111/cch.12080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Desmarais C, Lindsay S, Piérart G, Tétreault S. The roles of effective communication and client engagement in delivering culturally sensitive care to immigrant parents of children with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1372–81. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.972580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziviani J, Poulsen A, King G, Johnson D. Motivation and paediatric interventions: is it a predisposition, a mechanism for change, or an outcome? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(10):965–66. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S, Ziviani J, King G, Boyd RN. Understanding engagement in home-based interactive computer play: perspectives of children with unilateral cerebral palsy and their caregivers. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36(4):343–58. doi:10.3109/01942638.2015.1076560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Schwellnus H, Keenan S, Chiarello C. Youth engagement in pediatric rehabilitation: service providers’ perceptions in a real-time study of solution-focused coaching for participation goals. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018. doi:10.1080/01942638.2017.1405864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart E, Aulakh A, McDougall C, Rigby P, King G. Optimizing engagement in goal pursuit with youth with physical disabilities attending life skills and transition programs: an exploratory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(20):2029–38. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1215558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arrigo RG, Copley J, Poulsen AA, Ziviani J, O’Brien S, Hunter J Parent engagement and disengagement in paediatric settings: an occupational therapy perspective. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yorks L, Kasl E. Toward a theory and practice for whole-person learning: reconceptualizing experience and the role of affect. Adult Educ Q. 2002;52(3):176–92. doi:10.1177/07417136020523002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiese BH, Bickham NL. Qualitative inquiry: an overview for pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998;23:79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1985. 1–416.
   Google Scholar
• Pless IB, Pinkerton P. Chronic childhood disorder: promoting patterns of adjustment. Chicago, IL: Yearbook Medical Publishers; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Potter J, Wetherell M. Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London (UK): Sage; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1997 March;33:159–74. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray J, McNeil H, Lafortune C, Black S, Prorok J, Stolee P. Measuring patients‘ experience of rehabilitation services across the care continuum. Part II: Key dimensions. ‎Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:121–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord C, Rapley T, Marcroft C, Pearse J, Basu A. Determinants of parent‐delivered therapy interventions in children with cerebral palsy: a qualitative synthesis and checklist. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44(5):659-669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Schwellnus H, Servais M, Baldwin P. Solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation: investigating transformative experiences and outcomes for families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(1):16–32. doi:10.1080/01942638.2017.1379457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Chiarello L. Family-centered care for children with cerebral palsy: conceptual and practical considerations to advance care and practice. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1046–54. doi:10.1177/0883073814533009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Trivette CM. Capacity-building family-systems intervention practices. J Fam Soc Work. 2009;12(2):119–43. doi:10.1080/10522150802713322.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, M., Jack, S. M., Rosenbaum, P. L., & Missiuna, C. (2018). A grounded theory of parents’ attendance, participation and engagement in children’s developmental rehabilitation services: Part 2. The journey to child health and happiness. Disability and Rehabilitation. doi:10.1080/096382888.2018.1555618.
   Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Gibson DE. Why does affect matter in organizations? Acad Manage Perspect. 2007;21(1):36–59. doi:10.5465/amp.2007.24286163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron J. Feeling and personhood: psychology in another key. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull. 2005;131(6):803–55. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56:218–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken U. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev. 1999;106:529–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk RD, Vella-Brodrick DA, Waters L. A complex dynamic systems approach to lasting positive change: the Synergistic Change Model. J Posit Psychol. 2018;13(4);404-418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R. Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(6):501–06. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.939744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giambra BK, Haas SM, Britto MT, Lipstein EA. Exploration of parent–provider communication during clinic visits for children with chronic conditions. J Pediatr Health Care. 2018;32(1):21–28. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Ray L, Darrah J, Magill-Evans J. Parents‘ perspectives on occupational therapy and physical therapy goals for children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(3):248–58. doi:10.3109/09638280903095890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchan JF Engagement: A concept and some possible uses. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2009;30:11–17. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1104530.
   Google Scholar
• Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(2):254–67. doi:10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies B, Steele R, Krueger G, Albersheim S, Baird J, Bifirie M, Cadell S, Doane G, Garga D, Siden H, et al. Best practice in provider/parent interaction. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(3):406–20. doi:10.1177/1049732316664712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar