A Case of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation for Childhood Stroke Hemiparesis: A Brief Report

References

• Kirton A, DeVeber G. Paediatric stroke: pressing issues and promising directions. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(1):92–102. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70227-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deVeber G, MacGregor D, Curtis R, Mayank S. Neurologic outcome in survivors of childhood arterial ischemic stroke and sinovenous thrombosis. J Child Neurol. 2000;15(0883–0738):316–24. doi:10.1177/088307380001500508.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, Kirton A, Rumney PG, Bagg S, Bayley M, Dowlatshahi D, Dukelow S, Garnhum M, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):459–84. doi:10.1177/1747493016643553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Liao KK, Lee IH, Lin YY. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2012;43(7):1849–57. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.649756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton A. Modeling developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke: defining central therapeutic targets in cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;48(2):81–94. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moliadze V, Schmanke T, Andreas S, Lyzhko E, Freitag CM, Siniatchkin M. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(7):1392–99. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. The Neuroscientist. 2011;17(1):37–53. doi:10.1177/1073858410386614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, Celnik PA, Krakauer JW. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(5):1590–95. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805413106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard G, Weiller C, Fritsch B, Reis J. Effects of different electrical brain stimulation protocols on subcomponents of motor skill learning. Brain Stimul. 2014;7(4):532–40. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;3:383–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajapakse T, Kirton A. Non-invasive brain stimulation in children: applications and future directions. Transl Neurosci. 2013;4:2. doi:10.2478/s13380-013-0116-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial direct-current stimulation can enhance motor learning in children. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(5):2758–67. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton A, Anderson J. Brain stimulation and constraint for hemiparesis after perinatal stroke: The PLASTIC CHAMPS trial. Eur J Paediatric Neurol. 2015;19(S1):S10. doi:10.1016/S1090-3798(15)30030-1.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey MA, Kaczynski KJ, Becker DA, Bartko JJ. Subjective reactions of children to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Child Neurol. 2001;16:891–94. doi:10.1177/088307380101601205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50:311–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Holmefur M, Kottorp A, Eliasson AC. The Assisting Hand Assessment: current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(4):259–64. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00259.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahey MJ, Kozin S, Merenda L, Gaughan J, Tian F, Gogola G, James MA, Ni P. Evaluation of the box and blocks test, stereognosis and item banks of activity and upper extremity function in youths with brachial plexus birth palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(Suppl 2):S114–122. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182595423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourke-Taylor H. Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function: construct validity and correlation with the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(2):92–96. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00911.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71(4):210–22. doi:10.1177/000841740407100406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Federman S, Wiemer D. Box and block test of manual dexterity: norms for 6–19 year olds. Can J Occup Ther. 1985;52(5):241–45. doi:10.1177/000841748505200505.
   Google Scholar
• Stagg CJ, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses ZT, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(5):800–04. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillick BT, Feyma T, Menk J, Krach LE, Usset M, Vaith A, Wood TJ, Worthington R. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Phys Ther. 2014;95(3):337–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology. 2017;88(3):259–67. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciechanski P, Carlson HL, Yu SS, Kirton A. Modeling transcranial direct-current stimulation-induced electric fields in children and adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:268. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta A, Baker JM, Bikson M, Fridriksson J. Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimul. 2011;4(3):169–74. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrus GG, Al-Moyed H, Chaieb L, Sarp L, Antal A, Paulus W. The fade-in – Short stimulation – Fade out approach to sham tDCS – Reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators. Brain Stimul. 2012;5(4):499–504. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar