Everyday Technology to Support Leisure and Daily Activities in People with Intellectual and Other Disabilities

References

• Badia M, Orgaz MB, Verdugo MA, Ullán AM. Patterns and determinants of leisure participation of youth and adults with developmental disabilities. J Intell Disabil Res. 2013;57:319–32. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01539.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Herold RG, Wehmeyer ML. GeoTalk: a GPS-enabled portable speech output device for people with intellectual disability. Adv Neurodev Disord. 2018;2:253–61. doi:10.1007/s41252-018-0068-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara DM, van der Meer L, Ramdoss S, O’Reilly MF, Lancioni GE, Davis TN, Rispoli M, Lang R, Marschik PB, Sutherland D, et al. Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:146–56. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Boccasini A, La Martire ML, Perilli V, Spagnuolo C. Technology to support positive occupational engagement and communication in persons with multiple disabilities. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2016;15:111–16. doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0023.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Campodonico F, Zimbaro C, Alberti G, Trubia G, Zagaria T. Helping people with multiple disabilities manage an assembly task and mobility via technology-regulated sequence cues and contingent stimulation. Life Span Disabil. 2018;21:143–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LP, Hsia YC, Hsu SW, Loh CH, Wu CL, Lin JD. Caregivers’ reported functional limitations in activities of daily living among middle-aged adults with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:4559–64. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin ML, Chiang MS, Shih CH, Li MF. Improving the occupational skills of students with intellectual disability by applying video prompting combined with dance pads. J Appl Res Intel Disabil. 2018;31:114–19. doi:10.1111/jar.12368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cannella-Malone HI, Schaefer JM. A review of research on teaching people with significant disabilities vocational skills. Career Dev Trans Except Individuals. 2017;40:67–78. doi:10.1177/2165143415583498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Boccasini A, La Martire ML, Lang R. Case studies of technology for adults with multiple disabilities to make telephone calls independently. Percept Motor Skills. 2014;119:320–31. doi:10.2466/15.PMS.119c14z4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold A, Lourie A, Petras H, Elis E. The use of assistive technology for cognition to support the performance of daily activities for individuals with cognitive disabilities due to traumatic brain injury: the current state of research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:359–78. doi:10.3233/NRE-151267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Gibson BE, Mistry B, Pinto M, Goh F, Teachman G, Thompson L. An integrated methods study of the experiences of youth with severe disabilities in leisure activity settings: the importance of belonging, fun, and control and choice. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1626–35. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.863389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci C, Miglino O, Alberti G, Perilli V, Lancioni GE. Speech generating technology to support request responses of persons with intellectual and multiple disabilities. Int J Dev Disabil. 2017;63:238–45. doi:10.1080/20473869.2017.1288888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Perilli V, Di Leone A, Damiani R, Albano V, Stella A, Damato C. Technological aids to support choice strategies by three girls with Rett syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;36:36–44. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D, Caron J. New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: state of the science and future research directions. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35:26–41. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Singh NN, O’Reilli MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G. Recent technology-aided programs to support adaptive responses, functional activities, and leisure and communication in people with significant disabilities. Front Neurol. 2019;10:643. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Campodonico F, Chiariello V. Promoting occupational engagement and personal satisfaction in people with neurodevelopmental disorders via a smartphone-based intervention. Adv Neurodev Disord. 2019;3:259–66. doi:10.1007/s41252-019-00102-4.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill B, Best C, O’Neill L, Ramos SDS, Gillespie A. Efficacy of a microprompting technology in reducing support needed by people with severe acquired brain injury in activities of daily living: a randomized control trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33:E33–41. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspa M, Fitzgerald T, Furberg RD, Wylie A, Moultrie R, DeRamus M, Wheeler AC, McCormack L. Mobile technology use and skills among individuals with fragile X syndrome: implications for healthcare decision making. J Intel Disabi Res. 2018;62:821–32. doi:10.1111/jir.12537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments: an intervention study. Dev Nurorehabil. 2017;20:129–41. doi:10.3109/17518423.2015.1132281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Perilli V, Chiariello V, Buono S. An upgraded smartphone-based program for leisure and communication of people with intellectual and other disabilities. Front Public Health. 2018;6:234. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Perilli V, Chiariello V, Grillo G, Turi C. A tablet-based program to enable people with intellectual and other disabilities to access leisure activities and video calls. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:14-20. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1508515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Perilli V, Zimbaro C, Chiariello V, Campodonico F. Supporting leisure and functional activity engagement in people with multiple disabilities via a technology-aided program. Technol Disabil. 2018;29:173–81. doi:10.3233/TAD-170182.
   Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Caffó AO, Damiani R, Perilli V, Di Leone A, Albano V. Assistive technology-based programs to promote communication and leisure activities by three children emerged from a minimal conscious state. Cogn Process. 2015;16:69–78. doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0625-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Green VA, Payne D, Son SH, O’Relly M, Lancioni GE. A comparison of picture exchange and speech-generating devices: acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction. Augment Altern Commun. 2009;25:99–109. doi:10.1080/07434610902739959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balboni G, Belacchi C, Bonichini S, Coscarelli A. Vineland II. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. Standardizzazione Italiana. Firenze, Italy: OS; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. ( Vineland II). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5:1–4. doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
   Google Scholar
• Irani Z, Gunasekaran A, Dwivedi YK. Radio frequency identification (RFID): research trends and framework. Int J Prod Res. 2010;48:2485–511. doi:10.1080/00207540903564900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ledford JR, Gast DL. Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24:332–48. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.861352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs TE, Mastropieri MA. PND at 25: past, present, and future trends in summarizing single-subject research. Rem Spec Educ. 2013;34:9–19. doi:10.1177/0741932512440730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. 2th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Makel MC, Plucker JA. Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educ Res. 2014;43:304–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X14545513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings. 7th ed. New York, NY: Waveland; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce WD, Cheney CD. Behavior analysis and learning. 4th ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy LM, Downs SJ, Knowles ZR, Fairclough SJ. Physical activity and play behaviours in children and young people with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional observational study. Sch Psychol Int. 2015;36:154–71. doi:10.1177/0143034314564242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caouette M, Lachapelle Y, Moreau J, Lussier-Desrochers D. Descriptive studies of caseworkers’ practices to support the development of self-determination of adults with intellectual disabilities. J Policy and Pract Intellect Disabil. 2018;15:4–11. doi:10.1111/jppi.12217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon A. Intellectual disability and activity engagement: exploring the literature from an occupational perspective. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:443–58. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.829398.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard L, Unsworth C. Developing skills in everyday activities and self-determination in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Rem Spec Educ. 2011;32:393–405. doi:10.1177/0741932510362223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreat S, Conroy JW. Longitudinal investigation of vocational engagement. J Policy and Pract Intellect Disabil. 2015;12:266–71. doi:10.1111/jppi.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy S, Green J, Maxwell H. I’ve got a mobile phone too! Hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:341–51. doi:10.1037/t20676-000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RO, Scherer MJ, Cooper R, Bell D, Hobbs DA, Pettersson C, Seymour N, Borg J, Johnson MJ, Lane JP, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:473–85. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1473895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond D, Layton N, Bentley J, Boot FH, Borg J, Dhungana BM, Gallagher P, Gitlow L, Gowran RJ, Groce N, et al. Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:437–44. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien A, O’Brien M, Schlosser RW, Yu C, Allen AA, Flynn S, Costello J, Shane H. Repurposing consumer products as a gateway to just-in-time communication. Semin Speech Lang. 2017;38:297–312. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owuor J, Larkan F. Assistive technology for an inclusive society for people with intellectual disability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:805–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobigo V, Morin D, Lachapelle Y. Assessing work task preferences among persons with intellectual disabilities: an integrative review of literature. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2007;42:286–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, Smith RO. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:373–80. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.749429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickson CA, McDonald RP, Mansfield R, Guilhardi P, Johnson C, Ahearn WH. Social validation of the New England center for children-core skills assessment. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:65–74. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1852-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiselli JK, Bass JD, Whitcomb SA. Teaching applied behavior analysis knowledge competencies to direct-care service providers: outcome assessment and social validation. Behav Modif. 2010;34:403–14. doi:10.1177/0145445510383526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plackett R, Thomas S, Thomas S. Professionals’ views on the use of smartphone technology to support children and adolescents with memory impairment due to acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:236–43. doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1127436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar