Putting Youth in Charge: Exploring a Multi-Year Interagency Community Engagement Experiential Programme for Youth with Disabilities and Their Families

References

• Anaby D, Avery L, Gorter JW, Levin MF, Teplicky R, Turner L, Cormier I, Hanes J. Improving body functions through participation in community activities among young people with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(5):640–646. doi:10.1111/dmcn.14382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Anaby D, Imms C, Teplicky R, Turner L. Improving the participation of youth with physical disabilities in community activities: an interrupted time series design. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):105–115. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, Imms C, Stewart D, Freeman M, Nguyen T. A transactional framework for pediatric rehabilitation: shifting the focus to situated contexts, transactional processes, and adaptive developmental outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1829–1841. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1309583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart D, Freeman M, Law M, Healy H, Burke-Gaffney J, Forhan M, Young N, Guenther S. “The best journey to adult life” for youth with disabilities: an evidence-based model and best practice guidelines for the transition to adulthood for youth with disabilities. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler PD, Gothberg J, Fowler C, Coyle J. Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: a model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Michigan: Western Michigan University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Collaboration on Workforce and Disability. Guideposts for success 2.0: a framework for successful youth transition to adulthood. Washington, DC: National Collaboration on Workforce and Disability; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• King GA, Baldwin PJ, Currie M, Evans J. The effectiveness of transition strategies for youth with disabilities. Child Health Care. 2006;35(2):155–178. doi:10.1207/s15326888chc3502_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landmark LJ, Song J, Dalun Z. Substantiated best practices in transition: fifteen plus years later. Career Dev Transit Except Individ. 2010;33(3):165–76. doi:10.1177/0885728810376410.
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Secondary Education and Transition. National standards and quality indicators: transition toolkit for systems improvement. Minneapolis MN: National Center on Secondary Education and Transition; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017;4:2333393617742282. doi:10.1177/2333393617742282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle L, McCabe C, Keogh B, Brady A, McCann M. An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(5):443–455. doi:10.1177/1744987119880234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: integrated and end-of-grant approaches. Ottawa, ON; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual res in sport. Qual Res Sport Exercise Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual. 2017;16(1):1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, Seko Y, Chiarello LA, Thompson L, Hartman LR. Building blocks of resiliency: a transactional framework to guide research, service design, and practice in pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;42(7):1031–40. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1515266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaby D, Hand C, Bradley L, DiRezze B, Forhan M, DiGiacomo A, Law M. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(19):1589–1598. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.748840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67(1):22–30. doi:10.1177/000841740006700105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rebeiro KL, Polgar JM. Enabling occupational performance: optimal experiences in therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1999;66(1):14–22. doi:10.1177/000841749906600102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Arrigo R, Ziviani J, Poulsen AA, Copley J, King G. Child and parent engagement in therapy: What is the key? Aust Occup Ther J. 2017;64(4):340–343. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff C, King G, McPherson AC, Kingsnorth S, Rudzik AE. Residential immersive life skills programs for youth with disabilities: experiences of parents and shifts in parenting approaches. J Adolesc. 2019;77(1):139–46. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, Herd N, Migliorini C, Willer B. The community integration questionnaire–revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63(3):143–153. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, McPherson AC, Kingsnorth S, Gorter JW, Avery L, Rudzik A and the OIPR Team. Opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of residential immersive life skills programs for youth with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(19):2758–68. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1716864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar