Improving a health information system for real-time data entries: An action research project using socio-technical systems theory

References

• Waring T, Wainwright D. Communicating the complexity of computer-integrated operations: An innovative use of process modelling in a North East hospital Trust. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2002;22(4):394–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haux R. Health information systems: Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006 Mar;75(3–4):268–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braa J, Hanseth O, Heywood A, Mohammed W, Shaw V. Developing Health Information Systems in developing countries: The flexible standards strategy. MIS Quarterly 2007 Jun 1;31(2):381–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2011 Jan 3;30(3):464–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichman RG, Kohli R, Krishnan R, editors. The role of information systems in healthcare: Current research and future trends. Information Systems Research 2011 Sep;22(3):419–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason K. Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS National Programme for Information Technology. Journal of Information Technology 2007 Sep;22(3):257–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterson P. Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: A progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS). Applied Ergonomics 2014 Mar;45(2, Part A):150–61.
   Google Scholar
• Chiasson M, Reddy M, Kaplan B, Davidson E. Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: What does information systems offer medical informatics? International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007 Jun;76 (Supplement 1):S89–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care an interactive sociotechnical analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007 Jun 28;14(5):542–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarts J. Towards safe electronic health records: A socio-technical perspective and the need for incident reporting. Health Policy Technology 2012 Mar;1(1):8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks R. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006 Feb;75(2):125–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty NF, King M. An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organisational issues in systems development projects. European Journal of Information Systems 2001 Sep;10(3):147–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul RJ, Ezz I, Kuljis J. Healthcare information systems: A patient-user perspective. Health Systems 2012 Dec;1(2):85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville RL, Wood-Harper AT. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 1996 Sep;11(3):235–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau F. A review on the use of action research in information systems studies. In: Lee AS, Liebenau J, DeGross JI, editors. Information Systems and Qualitative Research [Internet]. Springer US; 1997 [cited 2014 Nov 6]. p. 31–68. (IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing). Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_4
   Google Scholar
• Avison DE, Lau F, Myers MD, Nielsen PA. Action research. Communications of the ACM. 1999 Jan;42(1):94–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay J, Marshall P. The poverty of action research in information systems. In: Castell AM, Gregory AJ, Hindle GA, James ME, Ragsdell G, editors. Synergy Matters [Internet]. Springer US; 1999. p. 187–92. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-306-47467-0_32
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville R, Myers MD. Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice. MIS Quarterly 2004 Sep;28(3):329–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama O, Nielsen PA. Using organizational influence processes to overcome IS implementation barriers: Lessons from a longitudinal case study of SPI implementation. European Journal of Information Systems [Internet]. 2013 Jan 22 [ cited 2013 Jul 3]; Available from: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/doifinder/10.1057/ejis.2012.56
   Google Scholar
• Clegg C, Shepherd C. “The biggest computer programme in the world…ever!”: Time for a change in mindset? Journal of Information Technology 2007 Sep;22(3):212–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012;12:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira L, Ferreira C, Santos BS. User-centered requirements engineering in health information systems: A study in the hemophilia field. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2012 Jun;106(3):160–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell KM, Sheikh A. Health information technology in hospitals: Current issues and future trends. Future Hospital Journal 2015 Jan 2;2(1):50–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann AL, Jones SS. What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2013 Jan 1;32(1):63–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt PG. HIT and MIS: Implications of health information technology and medical information systems. Communications of the ACM 2005 Oct;48(10):68–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1999;6(4):313–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, Glaser J, Shetty KD, Jaggi T, et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13(3):261–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, Ash JS, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: A report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011 Jan 1;18(1):82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A. Role of Computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. ACC Current Journal Review 2005 Jul;14(7):8.
   Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11(2):104–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford E. The story of socio-technical design: Reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Information Systems 2006 Oct 1;16(4):317–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter G, Sommerville I. Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers 2011 Jan;23(1):4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes LF, Zhang J, Gil-García JR, Cresswell AM. Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: A practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems 2005 Mar;14(1):93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC. Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 1994 Apr;12(2):174–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999 Aug;55(2):87–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom RP, Heinen JS. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective, Part II: The application of socio-technical theory. MIS Quarterly 1977 Dec 1;1(4):11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty NF. The role of socio-technical principles in leveraging meaningful benefits from IT investments. Applied Ergonomics 2014 Mar;45(2, Part A):181–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M, Langenberg C, Berg I, Kwakkernaat J. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1998 Oct 1;52(1–3): 243–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom RP, Heinen JS. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective PART 1: The causes. Management Information Systems Quarterly [Internet]. 1977 Dec 31;1(1). Available from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol1/iss1/9
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer S, Jarrahi MH. Sociotechnical approaches to the study of Information Systems. In: Computing handbook: Information systems and information. 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2014. p. 5–1.
   Google Scholar
• Scacchi W. Socio-technical design. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction 2004;1:656–9.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson DE, Heslinga DD. Bridging the IT adoption gap for small physician practices: An action research study on electronic health records. Information Systems Management 2006 Dec 22;24(1):15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiasson M, Germonprez M, Mathiassen L. Pluralist action research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems 2009 Jan;19(1):31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakhus M, Ågerfalk PJ, Lyytinen K, Te’eni D. Symbolic action research in information systems: Introduction to the special issue. MIS Quarterly 2014;38(4):1187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring TS, Alexander M. Innovations in inpatient flow and bed management: An action research project in a UK acute care hospital. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2015 Apr 28;35(5):751–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 1946 Nov 1;2(4):34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin K. Frontiers in Group Dynamics II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations 1947 Jan 11;1(2):143–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport RN. Three dilemmas in action research with special reference to the Tavistock experience. Human Relations 1970 Jan 12;23(6):499–513.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller M, Greenwood D, Maguire P. Why action research? Action Research 2003;1(1):9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland P, Holwell S. Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research 1998 Feb;11(1):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen JH, Mathiassen L, Nielsen PA. Managing risk in software process improvement: an action research approach. MIS Quarterly 2004 Sep 1;28(3):395–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susman GI, Evered RD. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 1978 Dec;23(4):582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham G. Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 2006 Jun;15(3):320–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Research and Reviews 1984 May 1;13(5):20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2000;320(7226):50–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Quality Reproduction 2003;8(4):597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan B, Maxwell JA. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In: Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems [Internet]. Springer; 2005 [ cited 2014 Jul 8]. p. 30–55. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-30329-4_2
   Google Scholar
• Lambert C, Jomeen J, McSherry W. Reflexivity: A review of the literature in the context of midwifery research. British Journal of Midwifery 2010;18(5):321.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty NF, King M. From technical to socio-technical change: Tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects. European Journal of Information Systems. 2005 Mar;14(1):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MC, Challenger R, Jayewardene DNW, Clegg CW. Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: A call for bravery. Applied Ergonomics 2014 Mar;45(2, Part A):171–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren H. Sociotechnical systems as innovation systems in the medical and health domain. In: Context Sensitive Health Informatics (CSHI) conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 2013. IOS Press;2013. p. 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J, Runciman WB, Merry AF. Towards safer, better healthcare: Harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems. Quality & Safety Health Care 2009 Jan 2;18(1):37–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coghlan D, Brannick T. Doing action research in your own organization. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 2014. 233 p.
   Google Scholar