Factors that predict the acceptance and adoption of smart home technology by seniors in Australia: a structural equation model with longitudinal data

References

• Morris M, Ozanne E, Miller K, Santamaria N, Pearce A, Said C, Adair B. Smart technologies to promote health and wellbeing of older Australians living at home. Report to institute for a broadband enabled society (IBES). Melbourne (Australia); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Maresova P, Krejcar O, Barakovic S, Barakovic Husic J, Lameski P, Zdravevski E, Chorbev I, Trajkovik V. Health-related ICT solutions of smart environments for elderly-systematic review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:54574–600. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkin S, Warburton J, Savy P, Moore M. Workforce crisis in residential aged care: insights from rural, older workers: workforce crisis in residential aged care. Aust J Public Admin. 2017;76(1):93–105. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendig H, Gong CH, Cannon L, Browning C. Preferences and predictors of aging in place: longitudinal evidence from Melbourne, Australia. J Hous Elderly. 2017;31(3):259–71. doi:10.1080/02763893.2017.1280582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C, Hargreaves T, Hauxwell-Baldwin R. Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2015;19(2):463–76. doi:10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder S, Aghayi E, Noferesti M, Memarzadeh-Tehran H, Mondal T, Pang Z, Deen MJ. Smart homes for elderly healthcare-recent advances and research challenges. Sensors. 2017;17(11):2496. doi:10.3390/s17112496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirzada P, Wilde A, Harris-Birtill D. Smart homes for elderly to promote their health and wellbeing. ACM WomENcourage celebration of women in computing. Rome Italy: September 6-18 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(9):624–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis L, Cruz AM, Rincon AR. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:44–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gövercin M, Meyer S, Schellenbach M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Weiss B, Haesner M. SmartSenior@home: acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households. Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(4):430–47. doi:10.3109/17538157.2015.1064425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal D, Funilkul S, Charoenkitkarn N, Kanthamanon P. Internet-of-things and smart homes for elderly healthcare: an end user perspective. IEEE Access. 2018;6:10483–96. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arar M, Jung C, Awad J, Chohan AH. Analysis of smart home technology acceptance and preference for elderly in Dubai, UAE. Designs. 2021;5(4):70. doi:10.3390/designs5040070.
   Google Scholar
• Choi YK, Thompson HJ, Demiris G. Use of an internet-of-things smart home system for healthy aging in older adults in residential settings: pilot feasibility study. JMIR Aging. 2020;3(2):e21964. doi:10.2196/21964.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oshni Alvandi A, Bain C, Burstein F, Patman S. Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0260058–e58. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Digital health. Canberra. 2020. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/digital-health
   Google Scholar
• McCallum J, Rees K, Maccora J. Bridging the senior digital divide. Brisbane. 2017. https://nationalseniors.com.au/uploads/12172826PAR_BridgingTheDigitalDivide_FNWeb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marikyan D, Papagiannidis S, Alamanos E. “Smart home sweet smart home”: an examination of smart home acceptance. Int JourJE-Business Res. 2021;17(2):1–23. doi:10.4018/IJEBR.2021040101.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hung T, Thao TMP, Kieu TNT, Hien DQ, editors. Research on factors influencing intention to use smart home devices in Danang. 2021 21st ACIS International Winter Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD-Winter); 2021 28 30 Jan. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Tsertsidis A, Kolkowska E, Hedström K. Factors influencing seniors’ acceptance of technology for ageing in place in the post-implementation stage: a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;129:324–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikou S. Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: an empirical assessment. Telemat Inform. 2019;45:101283. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettiga D, Lamberti L, Lettieri E. Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach. Health Care Manag Sci. 2020;23(2):203–14. doi:10.1007/s10729-019-09468-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu W, Bao P, Hao W, Kim J. Empirical examination of intention to continue to use smart home services. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5213. doi:10.3390/su11195213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemad-Sajadi R, Gomes Dos Santos G. Senior citizens’ acceptance of connected health technologies in their homes. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019;32(8):1162–74. doi:10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2018-0240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldossari MQ, Sidorova A. Consumer acceptance of internet of things (IoT): smart home context. J Comput Inf Syst. 2020;60(6):507–17. doi:10.1080/08874417.2018.1543000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andini ND, Adiwijaya K. What factors do affect the adoption of internet of things (smart home) in Indonesia. Int J Bus Technol Manag. 2021;3(2). https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbtm/article/view/14022
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Yigitcanlar T, Erol I, Liu A. Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: from systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021;80:102211. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashal I, Shuhaiber A, Daoud M. Factors influencing the acceptance of smart homes in Jordan. Int J Elect Mark Retail. 2020;11(2):113. doi:10.1504/IJEMR.2020.106842.
   Google Scholar
• Schomakers E-M, Biermann H, Ziefle M. Users’ preferences for smart home automation – investigating aspects of privacy and trust. Telemat Inform. 2021;64:101689. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marikyan D, Papagiannidis S, Alamanos E. A systematic review of the smart home literature: a user perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019;138:139–54. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy R, Letheren K, McAndrew R, Glavas C, Russell-Bennett R. Are households ready to engage with smart home technology? J Mark Manag. 2019;35(15–16):1370–400. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2019.1680568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform. 2017;101:75–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukder MS, Sorwar G, Bao Y, Ahmed JU, Palash MAS. Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: a combined SEM-Neural network approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;150:119793. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer T-F, Recker J, Bick M. Technology-induced anxiety: manifestations, cultural influences, and its effect on the adoption of sensor-based technology in German and Australian hospitals. Inf Manag. 2017;54(1):73–89. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek STM, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJM, Nieboer ME, Aarts S, van der Voort CS, Rijnaard MD, Wouters EJM. Understanding changes and stability in the long-term use of technologies by seniors who are aging in place: a dynamical framework. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):236–36. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1241-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnemolla P. Ageing in place and the internet of things – how smart home technologies, the built environment and caregiving intersect. Vis Eng. 2018;6(1):1–16. doi:10.1186/s40327-018-0066-5.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thi-Hong-Linh N, Minh-Hung D, Hai-Dang N, Dang-hongngan V, Duy-Phuong-Trinh V, Hoanh-Su L. Key determinants for users intention to use smarthome devices in Vietnam. J Multimedia Inf Syst. 2018;5(4):283–90. doi:10.9717/JMIS.2018.5.4.283.
   Google Scholar
• Shuhaiber A, Mashal I. Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes. Technol Soc. 2019;58:101110. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert M, Blut M, Brock C, Zhang RW, Koch V, Riedl R. The influence of acceptance and adoption drivers on smart home usage. Eur J Mark. 2019;53(6):1073–98. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal D, Funilkul S, Vanijja V, Papasratorn B. Analyzing the elderly users’ adoption of smart-home services. IEEE Access. 2018;6:51238–52. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Liu Y, Che X, Chen X. Moderating factors influencing adoption of a mobile chronic disease management system in China. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018;43(1):22–41. doi:10.1080/17538157.2016.1255631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimperman M, Brenčič MM, Trkman P. Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior − applying an extended UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform. 2016;90:22–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz M, Martin P, Margrett JA, Yearns M, Franke W, Yang H-I, Wong J, Chang CK. Perceptions of technology among older adults. J Gerontol Nurs. 2013;39(1):42–51. doi:10.3928/00989134-20121204-04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallmahomed MZI, Lallmahomed N, Lallmahomed GM. Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services in Mauritius. Telemat Inform. 2017;34(4):57–72. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bixter MT, Blocker KA, Mitzner TL, Prakash A, Rogers WA. Understanding the use and non-use of social communication technologies by older adults: a qualitative test and extension of the UTAUT model. Gerontechnology. 2019;18(2):70–88. doi:10.4017/gt.2019.18.2.002.00.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi JK, Ji YG. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2015;31(10):692–702. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai T-H, Lin W-Y, Chang Y-S, Chang P-C, Lee M-Y, Borsci S. Technology anxiety and resistance to change behavioral study of a wearable cardiac warming system using an extended TAM for older adults. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227270–e70. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam T, Salem A, Alsharif A, Alhujaili A. Smart home automation towards the development of smart cities. J Comput Sci Inf Technol. 2020;5:152–59. doi:10.36227/techrxiv.12657185.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. About the commonwealth home support programme (CHSP. Australian Government. 2020. https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/commonwealth-home-support-programme-chsp/about-the-commonwealth-home-support-programme-chsp
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–52. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2015;81(1):10–23. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi YK, Shareef MA, Simintiras AC, Lal B, Weerakkody V. A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Gov Inf Q. 2016;33(1):174–87. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11(4):342–65. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra N. Marketing research: an applied orientation. Noida (India): Pearson Education; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th. Harlow (Essex): Pearson Education; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Indust Manag Data Sys. 2016;116(1):2–20. doi:10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L-t H, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhagarra D, Goswami M, Kumar G. Impact of trust and privacy concerns on technology acceptance in healthcare: an Indian perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2020;141:104164. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werber B, Baggia A, Žnidaršič A. Factors affecting the intentions to use RFID subcutaneous microchip implants for healthcare purposes. Organizacija. 2018;51(2):121–33. doi:10.2478/orga-2018-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirzada P, Wilde A, Doherty GH, Harris-Birtill D. Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults. Inform Health Soc Care. 2022;47(1):10–37. doi:10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sequeiros H, Oliveira T, Thomas MA. The impact of IoT smart home services on psychological well-being. Inf Syst Front. 2021. doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10118-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubaishat A. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses: application of technology acceptance model. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018;43(4):379–89. doi:10.1080/17538157.2017.1363761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirzada P, Wilde A, Doherty GH, Harris-Birtill D. Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults. Inform Health Soc Care. 2021;ahead-of-print(ahead–of–print):1–28. doi:10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500.
   Google Scholar
• Gao L, Bai X. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pac J Mark Log. 2014;26(2):211–31. doi:10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061.
   Google Scholar
• Hong A, Nam C, Kim S. What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services? Telecomm Policy. 2020;44(2):101867. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder B, Chung J, Lyden K, Winters J, Jankowski CM. Older women’s perceptions of wearable and smart home activity sensors. Inform Health Soc Care. 2020;45(1):96–109. doi:10.1080/17538157.2019.1582054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar