Designing for user empowerment through an involving process

References

• Bang, A. L. (2013). The repertory grid as a tool for dialog about emotional value of textiles. Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–25. doi:10.2752/175183513X13772670831038
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2003). Sources of inspiration in industrial practice. The case of knitwear design. Journal of Design Research, 3(1). doi:10.1504/JDR.2003.009826
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, A. M., & Kimle, P. A. (1997). Understanding aesthetics for the merchandising and design professional. New York: Fairchild Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, K. (2016). Craft of use: Post-growth fashion. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2017). Opening up the wardrobe: A methods book. Oslo: Novus.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, K., & Tham, M. (2019). Earth logic fashion action research plan. The J. J. Charitable Trust. Retrieved August 22, 2022, from https://earthlogic.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Earth-Logic-eversion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In P. Atkinson & S. Delamont (Eds.), SAGE qualitative research methods, (pp. 220–245). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique (2nd ed.). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Klepp, I. G., & Laitala, K. (2015). Consumption studies: The force of the ordinary. In K. Fletcher & M. Tham (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sustainability and fashion (pp. 121–130). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham. MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Laitala, K., Boks, C., & Klepp, I. G. (2015). Making clothing last: A design approach for reducing the environmental impacts. International Journal of Design, 9(2), 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., & Hauge, B. (2011). Materialised ideals: Sizes and beauty. Culture Unbound, 3(1), 19–41. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.11319
   Google Scholar
• Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., & Henry, B. (2018). Does use matter? Comparison of environmental impacts of clothing based on fiber type. Sustainability, 10(7). doi:10.3390/su10072524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, J. (2012). Customer perspective on mass-customized knitwear. Fashion Practice, 4(2), 177–195. doi:10.2752/175693812X13403765252307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldini, I., & Balkenende, A. R. (2017, November 8–10). Reducing clothing production volumes by design: A critical review of sustainable fashion strategies. In C. Bakker & R. Mugge (Eds.), Product lifetimes and the environment 2017 - Conference Proceedings (pp. 233–237). PLATE conference. Delft University of Technology, Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowns, D. H. (1997). Places to intervene in a system. Whole earth, (Winter).
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, K. (2011). From disposable to sustainable: The complex interplay between design and consumption of textiles and clothing (PhD thesis). Aalto University, School of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189–200. doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Larsson, J., Carlsson, J., & Andersson, P. (2008). Knit on demand - Development and simulation of a production and shop model for customised knitted garments. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 1(2), 89–99. doi:10.1080/17543260802353399
   Google Scholar
• Pine, B. J. (1999). Mass-customization: The new frontier in business competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravnløkke, L. (2019). Design af strikbluser til lang levetid: Strikkede prototyper som redskab for brugerdialog i designprocessen [Design of knitted jumpers for longevity: Knitted prototypes as a tool for user dialogue in the design process] (PhD thesis). Design School Kolding.
   Google Scholar
• Redström, J. (2017). Making design theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revsbæk, L., & Tanggaard, L. (2015). Analyzing in the present. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(4), 376–387. doi:10.1177/1077800414562896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, M. (2016). Creative resilience thinking in textiles and fashion. In J. Jefferies, D. W. Conroy, & H. Clark (Eds.), The handbook of textile culture (pp. 225–240). London: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, M. (2020). Caring from fashion - Letter to emerging fashion activists. In M. B. Saad, Critical Fashion Project (Eds.). Stocholm: Beckmans College of Design. Retrieved August 22, 2022. https://www.criticalfashionproject.org/text/caring-from-fashion-letter-to-emerging-fashion-activists/
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, S. (2020). Material methods: Researching and thinking with things. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar