The contribution and impact of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health on quality of life in communication disorders

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Scope of practice for speech-language pathology. ASHA, Rockville, MD 2001
   Google Scholar
• Birren J. E., Lubben J. E., Cichowlas Rowe J., Deutchman D. E. The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1991
   Google Scholar
• Brush J., Threats T., Calkins M. Influences on perceived function of a nursing home resident. Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2003; 36: 379–393
   Google Scholar
• Cruice M. Communication and quality of life in older people with aphasia and healthy older people. Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Queensland, Australia 2001, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Cruice M., Hill R., Worrall L., Hickson L. Exploring the construct of activity in quality of life in older people with and without aphasia. Paper presented at British Aphasiology Society International Conference, EdinburghScotland, September, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Cruice M., Worrall L., Hickson L., Murison R. Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: Social and emotional health, and psychological well-being. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 333–353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins R. Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: Intellectual/Cognitive Disability5th ed. 1997, (ComQoL I-5). Retrieved from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/com_scale.htm on 23 April 2007
   Google Scholar
• Duchan J. F. Impairement and social views of speech-language pathology: Clinical pratices re-examined. Advances in Speech-language Pathology 2001; 3: 37–46
   Google Scholar
• Eadie T. Application of the ICF in communication after total laryngectomy. Seminars in Speech and Language 2007; 28: 291–300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebrahim S. Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement. Social Science & Medicine 1995; 41: 1383–1394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P. Outcome measures in speech therapy: Impairment, disability, handicap and distress. Health Trends 1992; 24: 61–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuhrer M. Subjective well-being: Implications for medical rehabilitation outcomes and models of disablement. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 73: 358–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M. The subjective well-being of people with spinal cord injury: Relationships to impairment, disability, and handicap. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 1996; 1: 56–71
   Google Scholar
• George L. K., Bearon L. B. Quality of life in older persons: Meaning and measurement. Human Sciences Press, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S., Cieza A., Kollerits B., Grimby G., Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research 2007; 16: 833–851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S., Cieza A., Schouten J., Dickson H., Frommelt P., Omar Z., Kostanjsek N., Ring H., Stucki G. ICF core sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004; 44(Suppl.)135–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K., Byng S. Measuring quality of life in people with aphasia: The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36(Suppl.)86–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch F., Holland A. Beyond activity: Measuring participation in society and quality of life. Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach, L. Worrall, C. Frattali. Thieme, New York 2000; 35–54
   Google Scholar
• Howe T., Worrall L., Hickson L. What is an aphasia-friendly environment?. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 1015–1037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. P.-M. Ma, Worrall, L., Threats, T. T., 2007. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Seminars in Speech and Language. 28: 241–243
   Google Scholar
• Oishi S., Diener E., Suh E., Lucas R. Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality 1999; 67: 157–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer M. Patient participation in the management of stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1999; 6: 43–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul D., Frattali C., Holland A., Thompson C., Caperton C., Slater S. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Quality of Communication Life Scale (QCL). ASHA, Rockville Pike, MD 2004
   Google Scholar
• Pope A. M., Tarlov A. R. Disability in America: Towards a national agenda for prevention. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1991
   Google Scholar
• Power M., Quinn K., Schmidt S., (WHOQOL-OLD Group). Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Quality of Life Research 2005; 14: 2197–2214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogerson R. Environmental and health-related quality of life: Conceptual and methodological similarities. Social Science & Medicine 1995; 41: 1373–1382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross K. B. Contribution of language impairment, communication activity limitation, and quality of life measures to differentiating normal from chronically aphasic adults. Vanderbilt University, USA 1999, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Ross K., Wertz R. Quality of life with and without aphasia. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 355–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross K., Wertz R. Advancing appraisal: Aphasia and the WHO. Aphasiology 2005; 19: 860–900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians (RCP). National clinical guidelines for strokesecond edition. RCP, London 2004, Prepared by the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research 2002; 11: 193–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skevington S., Lotfy M., O'Connell K. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research 2004; 13: 299–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate D., Dijkers M., Johnson-Greene L. Outcome measures in quality of life. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1996; 2: 1–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The WHOQoL Group. The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (the WHOQoL). Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives, J. Orley, W. Kuyken. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 1994
   Google Scholar
• Threats T. T. Towards an international framework for communication disorders: Use of the ICF. Journal of Communication Disorders 2006; 39: 251–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threats T. T. Use of the ICF in clinical practice in speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2008; 10: 50–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threats T. T., Worrall L. Classifying communication disability using the ICF. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 6: 53–62
   Google Scholar
• Ware J. J., Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short – form survey (SF-36): I Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30: 473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson I., Cleary P. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995; 273: 59–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF Introduction. 2007, Document retrieved from http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm?myurl=introduction.html%20&mytitle=Introduction on 23 April 2007
   Google Scholar
• Wyller T. Disability models in geriatrics: Comprehensive rather than competing models should be promoted. Disability & Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 480–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar