The discourse of speech-language pathology

References

• Adams C. Practitioner review: The assessment of language pragmatics. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 2002; 43: 973–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel K. Checks and balances: Keeping the science in our profession. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1999; 30: 98–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong E., Ferguson A., Mortensen L., Togher L. Acquired language disorders perspective. Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (ch. 14), J. Webster, R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen. Equinox, London 2007
   Google Scholar
• ASHA. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD 2001
   Google Scholar
• D. E. Battle, 1993. Communication disorders in multicultural populations. Boston, MA, Andover Medical Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Beecham R. “Clients” as teachers: Power-sharing in the speech-language therapy curriculum. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2005; 7: 130–137
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V., Baird G. Parent and teacher report of pragmatic aspects of communication: Use of the children's communication checklist in a clinical setting. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2001; 43: 809–818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Language and symbolic power. Polity Press, Oxford 1991, (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• CASLPA. Scopes of practice in speech-language pathology and audiology in Canada. Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists, Ottawa, ON 1998
   Google Scholar
• L. R. Cherney, Shadden, B. B., Coelho, C. A., 1998. Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen
   Google Scholar
• Derrida J. Positions. Continuum, London 2004, (A. Bass, Trans. Originally published in France in 1972 as Positions by Les Editions de Minuit ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Duchan J. Reports written by speech-language pathologists: The role of agenda in constructing client competence. Constructing (In)competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction, D. Kovarsky, J. F. Duchan, M. Maxwell. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 1999; 223–224
   Google Scholar
• Duchan J. Impairment and social views of speech-language pathology: Clinical practices re-examined. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 3: 37–45
   Google Scholar
• Duchan J. What do you know about the history of speech-language pathology?. ASHA Leader 2002; 7(December)4–5 & 29
   Google Scholar
• Duchan J. Professional identity: Then and now. 2004, Retrieved 30 Oct 2006, from www.speechpathology.com/articles/pf_article_detail.asp?article_id=69
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough N. Language and power. Longman, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity, R. Wodak, P. Chilton. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2005; 53–70
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A. A critical discourse perspective on speech-language pathology. Expert practice: A critical discourse, A. Ferguson. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA 2008a; 1–18
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A. Expert practice: A critical discourse. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA 2008b
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A., Armstrong E. Reflections on speech-language therapists' talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2004; 39: 469–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Pantheon Books, New York 1980, (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Dits et ecrits. Quarto Gallimard, Paris 2001, (Vol. I: 1954–1975)
   Google Scholar
• T. M. Gallagher, Prutting, C. A., 1983. Pragmatic assessment and intervention issues in language. San Diego, CA, College-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Habermas J. Knowledge and human interests. Heinemann Educational, London 1972, (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• Hadley P. A. Language sampling protocols for eliciting text-level discourse. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1998; 27: 132–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday M A. K. Spoken and written modes of meaning. On grammar, J. J. Webster, London 2002; 323–351, Continuum (first published in Comprehending oral and written language, 1987, Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 55–82)
   Google Scholar
• Halliday M. A. K., Matthiessen C. An introduction to functional grammar3rd ed. Arnold, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hand L. Setting the tone: Interviews between speech pathologists and parents of children from non-dominant cultural groups. Evidence and innovation: Proceedings of the 2001 Speech Pathology Australia national conference, L. Wilson, S. Hewat. Speech Pathology Australia, Melbourne, 299–306
   Google Scholar
• Hand L. The discourse of speech pathology. Paper presented at the national conference of Speech Pathology Australia, Hobart, May, 2003a
   Google Scholar
• Hand L. Discourses in the professional practices of speech pathology interviews. 2003b, Unpublished PhD thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney
   Google Scholar
• Hand L. Clinicians as “information givers”: What communication access are clients given to speech-language pathology services. Topics in Language Disorders 2006; 26: 240–265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh D. Experiences of ending aphasia therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2001; 36(Suppl.)80–85
   Google Scholar
• Holland A. L. Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 1991; 6: 197–211
   Google Scholar
• Isaac K. M. Speech pathology in cultural and linguistic diversity. Whurr, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis S., McTaggart R. Participatory action research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research3rd ed., N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Sage Publications, London 2005; 559–603
   Google Scholar
• Kress G. Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1990; 11: 84–99
   Google Scholar
• Locke S. Critical discourse analysis. Continuum, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Lupton D. Content analysis. Handbook for research methods in health sciences, V. Minichiello, G. Sullivan, K. Greenwood, R. Axford. Addison Wesley Longman, Sydney 1999; 449–462
   Google Scholar
• Martin J. R., Matthiessen C. M. I. M., Painter C. Working with functional grammar. Arnold, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Martin J. R., Rose D. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• McHoul A., Grace W. A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne 1993
   Google Scholar
• Miller J. F. Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts. Language Analysis Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 1984–2004, (SALT) (Version Research V8.0)
   Google Scholar
• N. Muller, 2000. Pragmatic approaches to aphasia. Amsterdam, John Benjamins
   Google Scholar
• Nelson N. W., Van Meter A. M. Partnerships for literacy in a writing lab approach. Topics in Language Disorders 2006; 26: 55–69
   Google Scholar
• Pillay M. “Do you speak practice-ese?” A discourse of practice for sharing communication. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36(Suppl.)351–356
   Google Scholar
• Pillay M., Kathard H., Samuel M. A. The curriculum of practice: A conceptual framework for speech-language therapy and audiology practice with a Black African first language clientele. South African Journal of Communication Disorders 1997; 44: 109–117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• QSR. 1999–2001, NVivo Version 1.3: QSR International, from http://www.qsrinternational.com
   Google Scholar
• P. Reason, Bradbury, H., 2001. Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London, Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Ringel R. L., Trachtman L. E., Prutting C. A. The science in human communication sciences. ASHA Leader 1984, December: 35–37
   Google Scholar
• R. Rogers, 2004. An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Siegel G. M. The limits of science in communication disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1987; 52: 306–311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel G. M., Ingham R. J. Theory and science in communication disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1987; 52: 99–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skrtic T. M. Power/knowledge and pragmatism: A postmodern view of the professions. Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity, T. M. Skrtic. Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New York 1995; 25–62
   Google Scholar
• SPAA. Scope of practice in speech pathology. Speech Pathology Australia, Melbourne 2002
   Google Scholar
• Street A. Professional craft knowledge and power relationships. Practice knowledge and expertise in the health professions, J. Higgs, A. Titchen. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford 2001; 207–212
   Google Scholar
• Thomson J. Clinical discourse analysis: One theory or many. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2003; 5: 41–49
   Google Scholar
• Togher L., Hand L., Code C. A new perspective on the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 559–566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner B. T., Hess C. W. Supervisors' use of social power with graduate supervisees in speech-language pathology. Journal of Communication Disorders 1999; 32: 351–368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L., Davidson B., Howe T., Rose T. A. Clients as teachers: Two aphasia groups at The University of Queensland. Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders2nd ed., R. Elman. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA 2007; 127–144
   Google Scholar
• Worrall L., Yiu E. Forging partnerships with volunteers. Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach, L. Worrall, C. Frattali. Thieme, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• L. Young, Harrison, C., 2004. Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. London, Continuum
   Google Scholar