Assessing automatic VOT annotation using unimpaired and impaired speech

References

• Adi, Y., Keshet, J., Cibelli, E., & Goldrick, M. (2017). Sequence segmentation using joint RNN and structured prediction models. In Proceedings of the 42st IEEE International Conference in Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Adi, Y., Keshet, J., Cibelli, E., Gustafson, E., Clopper, C., & Goldrick, M. (2016a). Automatic measurement of vowel duration via structured prediction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140, 4517–4527. doi:10.1121/1.4972527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adi, Y., Keshet, J., Dmitrieva, O., & Goldrick, M. (2016b). Automatic measurement of voice onset time and prevoicing using recurrent neural networks. In the 17th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, D.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 527–554. doi:10.1080/01690960802299378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, G., Hofmann, T., Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., Taskar, B., & Vishwanathan, S. (2007). Predicting structured data. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., Gagnon, B., & Miozzo, M. (2017). Phonological and motor errors in individuals with acquired sound production impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1726–1738. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2011). Finding levels of abstraction in speech production: Evidence from sound-production impairment. Psychological Science, 22, 1113–1119. doi:10.1177/0956797611417723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2012). Phonological and motor errors in individuals with acquired sound production impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1573–1586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buz, E., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Jaeger, T.F. (2016). Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers? Subsequent pronunciations. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 68–86. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buz, E. (2016). Speaking with a (slightly) new voice: Investigating speech changes, communicative goals, and learning from past communicative success (Doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Crammer, K., Dekel, O., Keshet, J., Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Singer, Y. (2006). Online passive aggressive algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 551–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissen, Y., & Keshet, J. (2016). Formant estimation and tracking using deep learning. In the 17th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–306. doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofolo, J., Lamel, L., Fisher, W., Fiscus, J., Pallett, D., & Dahlgren, N. (1993). TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, J., Holliman, E., & McDaniel, J. (1992). Switchboard: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In Proceedings of ICASSP-92 (Vol. 1, pp. 517–520), San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Keshet, J., Gustafson, E., Heller, J., & Needle, J. (2016). Automatic analysis of slips of the tongue: Insights into the cognitive architecture of speech production. Cognition, 149, 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirov, C., & Wilson, C. (2012). The specificity of online variation in speech production. In Proceedings of the the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., & Christensen, R.H.B. (2017). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82.
   Google Scholar
• Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422. doi:10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowozin, S., Gehler, P.V., Jancsary, J., & Lampert, C.H. (2014). Advanced structure prediction. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, N. (2011). Interactions in bilingual speech processing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Sha, F., & Saul, L. (2005). Real-time pitch determination of one or more voices by nonnegative matrix factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Proceedings of the 18th annual Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) conference, held in Vancouver, Canada, from 13–18 December 2004. (Vol. 17, pp. 1233–1240).
   Google Scholar
• Sheena, Y., Hejn_A, M., Adi, Y., & Keshet, J. (2017). Automatic measurement of pre-aspiration. In The 18th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, M., Bane, M., & Graff, P. (2017). The medium-term dynamics of accents on reality television. Language, 93, 598–640. doi:10.1353/lan.2017.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, M., & Keshet, J. (2012). Automatic measurement of voice onset time using discriminative structured prediction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 3965–3979. doi:10.1121/1.4763995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talkin, D. (1995). A robust algorithm for pitch tracking (RAPT). In W. Kleijn & K. Paliwal (Eds.), Speech coding and synthesis (pp. 495–518). New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar