Automatic speech recognition: A primer for speech-language pathology researchers

References

• Ai, O.C., Hariharan, M., Yaacob, S., & Chee, L.S. (2012). Classification of speech dysfluencies with MFCC and LPCC features. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 2157–2165. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodei, D., Ananthanarayanan, S., Anubhai, R., Bai, J., Battenberg, E., Case, C., … Chen, J. (2016). Deep speech 2: End-to-end speech recognition in English and Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 173–182). New York City, NY: PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Bocklet, T., Nöth, E., Stemmer, G., Ruzickova, H., & Rusz, J. (2011, December). Detection of persons with Parkinson's disease by acoustic, vocal, and prosodic analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) (pp. 478–483). Hawaii: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bocklet, T., Riedhammer, K., Nöth, E., Eysholdt, U., & Haderlein, T. (2012). Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modelling. Journal of Voice, 26, 390–397. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocklet, T., Steidl, S., Nöth, E., & Skodda, S. (2013). Automatic evaluation of Parkinson's speech-acoustic, prosodic and voice related cues. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 1149–1153). ISCA: Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Morales, S.O., & Trujillo-Romero, F. (2014). Evolutionary approach for integration of multiple pronunciation patterns for enhancement of dysarthric speech recognition. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 841–852. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, J., & Green, P. (2004). Revisiting dysarthria assessment intelligibility metrics. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP’04) (pp. 742–745). Jeju Island, Korea: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Casanueva, I., Christensen, H., Hain, T., & Green, P.D. (2014). Adaptive speech recognition and dialogue management for users with speech disorders. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 1776–1779). ISCA: Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H., Cunningham, S., Fox, C., Green, P.D., & Hain, T. (2012). A comparative study of adaptive, automatic recognition of disordered speech. INTERSPEECH (pp. 1776–1779). Portland, OR: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H., Green, P.D., & Hain, T. (2013, August). Learning speaker-specific pronunciations of disordered speech. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 1159–1163). ISCA: Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, R.P., Martens, J.P., van Son, R.J., Hilgers, F.J., van den Brekel, M.M., & Middag, C. (2016). Computing scores of voice quality and speech intelligibility in tracheoesophageal speech for speech stimuli of varying lengths. Computer Speech & Language, 37, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.csl.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, R., Middag, C., Hilgers, F., Martens, J.P., Van Den Brekel, M., & van Son, R. (2014). Developing automatic articulation, phonation and accent assessment techniques for speakers treated for advanced head and neck cancer. Speech Communication, 59, 44–54. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28, 357–366. doi:10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163420
   Google Scholar
• Deller, J.R., Hsu, D., & Ferrier, L.J. (1991). On the use of hidden Markov modelling for recognition of dysarthric speech. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 35, 125–139. doi:10.1016/0169-2607(91)90071-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., Hinton, G., & Kingsbury, B. (2013, May). New types of deep neural network learning for speech recognition and related applications: An overview. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 (pp. 8599–8603). Vancouver, Canada: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P.C., Leeper, H.A., Kotler, A.L., & Thomas-Stonell, N. (1997). Dysarthric speech: A comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligility. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 34, 309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, T.H., Chan, W.Y., & Shein, F. (2012). Characterization of atypical vocal source excitation, temporal dynamics and prosody for objective measurement of dysarthric word intelligibility. Speech Communication, 54, 622–631. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrier, L., Shane, H., Ballard, H., Carpenter, T., & Benoit, A. (1995). Dysarthric speakers' intelligibility and speech characteristics in relation to computer speech recognition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 165–175. doi:10.1080/07434619512331277289
   Google Scholar
• Fosler-Lussier, J.E. (1999). Dynamic pronunciation models for automatic speech recognition (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley Fall 1999). Retrieved from ftp://ftp.icsi.berkeley.edu/global/global/pub/speech/papers/thesis-fosler99.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Keshet, J., Gustafson, E., Heller, J., & Needle, J. (2016). Automatic analysis of slips of the tongue: Insights into the cognitive architecture of speech production. Cognition, 149, 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, A., & Jaitly, N. (2014). Towards end-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14) (pp. 1764–1772). Beijing, China: PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, A., Mohamed, A.R., & Hinton, G. (2013). Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. IEEE international conference on Acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 2013 (pp. 6645–6649). Vancouver, Canada: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, A., Santiago, F., & Gomez, F. (2006). Connectionist temporal classification: Labelling unsegmented sequence data with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2006 (pp. 369–376). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Omni Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P.D., Carmichael, J., Hatzis, A., Enderby, P., Hawley, M.S., & Parker, M. (2003). Automatic speech recognition with sparse training data for dysarthric speakers. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH). ISCA: Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S., Hollenback, J., & Ellis, D. (1996). Insights into spoken language gleaned from phonetic transcription of the Switchboard corpus. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing: Vol. 96. (pp. 24–27). Philadelphia, PA: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, L., Harris, J. G., Shrivastav, R., & Sapienza, C. (2005). Disordered speech assessment using automatic methods based on quantitative measures. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 1400–1409. doi:10.1155/ASP.2005.1400
   Google Scholar
• Haderlein, T., Nöth, E., Batliner, A., Eysholdt, U., & Rosanowski, F. (2011). Automatic intelligibility assessment of pathologic speech over the telephone. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 36, 175–181. doi:10.3109/14015439.2011.607470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, M., Enderby, P., Green, P., Brownsell, S., Hatzis, A., Parker, M., … Palmer, R. (2006). STARDUST; speech training and recognition for dysarthric users of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology (AAATE) (Vol. 20, pp. 149–963). AAATE: Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansky, H. (1990). Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 1738–1752. doi:10.1121/1.399423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermansky, H., & Morgan, N. (1994). RASTA processing of speech. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2, 578–589. doi:10.1109/89.326616
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, G.E. (2002). Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Computation, 14, 1771–1800. doi:10.1162/089976602760128018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G.E. (2012). A practical guide to training restricted Boltzmann machines. In Neural networks: Tricks of the trade (pp. 599–619). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A-r., Jaitly, N., … Kingsbury, B. (2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modelling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29, 82–97. doi:10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18, 1527–1554. doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosom, J.P., Shriberg, L., & Green, J.R. (2004). Diagnostic assessment of childhood apraxia of speech using automatic speech recognition (ASR) methods. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, G., & Abdelhamied, K. (1995). Experiments in dysarthric speech recognition using artificial neural networks. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 32, 162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinek, F. (1997). Statistical methods for speech recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D. (2000). Speech & language processing. London, UK: Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D. (Ed.). (1992). Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement and management (Vol.1). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M.J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2015). Automatic intelligibility assessment of dysarthric speech using phonologically-structured sparse linear model. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 23, 694–704. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2015.2403619
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Kumar, N., Tsiartas, A., Li, M., & Narayanan, S.S. (2015). Automatic intelligibility classification of sentence-level pathological speech. Computer Speech & Language, 29, 132–144. doi:10.1016/j.csl.2014.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzing, P., Maier, A., & Åhlander, V.L. (2009). Automatic speech recognition (ASR) and its use as a tool for assessment or therapy of voice, speech, and language disorders. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 34, 91–96. doi:10.1080/14015430802657216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa, S., Pennington, L., Miller, N., Robson, S., Thompson, V., & Steen, N. (2014). Association between objective measurement of the speech intelligibility of young people with dysarthria and listener ratings of ease of understanding. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 408–416. doi:10.3109/17549507.2014.927922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, D., Licata, K., Persad, C., & Mower Provost, E. (2016). Automatic assessment of speech intelligibility for individuals with aphasia. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 24, 2187–2199. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2016.2598428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, D., & Mower Provost, E. (2014). Modelling pronunciation, rhythm, and intonation for automatic assessment of speech quality in aphasia rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 1563–1567). Singapore: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Le, D., & Mower Provost, E. (2016). Improving automatic recognition of aphasic speech with Aphasiabank. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 2681–2685). San Francisco, CA: ISCA. doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2016
   Google Scholar
• Livescu, K. (2005). Feature-based pronunciation modelling for automatic speech recognition (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34488
   Google Scholar
• Maier, A., Haderlein, T., Eysholdt, U., Rosanowski, F., Batliner, A., Schuster, M., & Nöth, E. (2009). PEAKS–A system for the automatic evaluation of voice and speech disorders. Speech Communication, 51, 425–437. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, A., Hönig, F., Bocklet, T., Nöth, E., Stelzle, F., Nkenke, E., & Schuster, M. (2009). Automatic detection of articulation disorders in children with cleft lip and palate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 2589–2602. doi:10.1121/1.3216913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, A., Nöth, E., Batliner, A., Nkenke, E., & Schuster, M. (2006). Fully automatic assessment of speech of children with cleft lip and palate. INFORMATICA-LJUBLJANA, 30, 477.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, S., Burkhardt, K., Schuster, M., Rogler, K., Maier, A., & Iro, H. (2010). The use of automatic speech recognition showing the influence of nasality on speech intelligibility. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 267, 1719–1725. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1256-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengistu, K.T., & Rudzicz, F. (2011). Comparing humans and automatic speech recognition systems in recognizing dysarthric speech. In Proceedings of the 24th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, St. John's. Canada: LNAI, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, Y., Gowayyed, M., & Metze, F. (2015). EESEN: End-to-end speech recognition using deep RNN models and WFST-based decoding. In Proceeding of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) (pp. 167–174). Scottsdale, Arizona: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Middag, C., Bocklet, T., Martens, J.P., & Nöth, E. (2011). Combining phonological and acoustic ASR-free features for pathological speech intelligibility assessment. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 3005–3008). Florence, Italy: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Middag, C., Martens, J.P., Van Nuffelen, G., & De Bodt, M. (2009). Automated intelligibility assessment of pathological speech using phonological features. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2009, 629030. doi:10.1155/2009/629030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Middag, C., Saeys, Y., & Martens, J.P. (2010). Towards an ASR-free objective analysis of pathological speech. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 294–297). Makuhari, Chiba, Japan: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Middag, C., Van Nuffelen, G., Martens, J.P., & De Bodt, M. (2008). Objective intelligibility assessment of pathological speakers. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 1745–1748). Brisbane, Australia: ISCA.International Speech Communication Association (ISCA).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, N. (2013). Measuring up to speech intelligibility. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 601–612. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, A.R., Dahl, G.E., & Hinton, G. (2012). Acoustic modelling using deep belief networks. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20, 14–22. doi:10.1109/TASL.2011.2109382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, N. (2012). Deep and wide: Multiple layers in automatic speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20, 7–13. doi:10.1109/TASL.2011.2116010
   Google Scholar
• Naaman, E., Adi, Y., & Keshet, J. (2017). Learning similarity function for pronunciation variations. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Stockholm, Sweden: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Rabiner, L.R., & Juang, B.H. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Riedhammer, K., Stemmer, G., Haderlein, T., Schuster, M., Rosanowski, F., Nöth, E., & Maier, A. (2007, December). Towards robust automatic evaluation of pathologic telephone speech. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding, (ASRU) (pp. 717–722). Kyoto, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rudzicz, F. (2007). Comparing speaker-dependent and speaker-adaptive acoustic models for recognizing dysarthric speech. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (pp. 255–256). Tempe, AZ: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rudzicz, F. (2016). Clear Speech: Technologies that Enable the Expression and Reception of Language. Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving Technologies, 5, 1–103. doi:10.2200/S00672ED1V01Y201509ARH008
   Google Scholar
• Rudzicz, F., Frydenlund, A., Robertson, S., & Thaine, P. (2016). Acoustic-articulatory relationships and inversion in sum-product and deep-belief networks. Speech Communication, 79, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2016.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzicz, F., Hirst, G., & van Lieshout, P. (2012). Vocal tract representation in the recognition of cerebral palsied speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1190–1207. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0223)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, M., Maier, A., Haderlein, T., Nkenke, E., Wohlleben, U., Rosanowski, F., … Nöth, E. (2006). Evaluation of speech intelligibility for children with cleft lip and palate by means of speech recognizer technique. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 70, 1741–1747. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, M., Haderlein, T., Nöth, E., Lohscheller, J., Eysholdt, U., & Rosanowski, F. (2006). Intelligibility of laryngectomees’ substitute speech: Automatic speech recognition and subjective rating. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck, 263, 188–193. doi:10.1007/s00405-005-0974-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong, W.K., Park, J.H., & Kim, H.K. (2012). Dysarthric speech recognition error correction using weighted finite state transducers based on context–dependent pronunciation variation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons (pp. 475–482). Vienna, Austria: LNCS, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shahamiri, S.R., & Salim, S.S.B. (2014). Artificial neural networks as speech recognisers for Dysarthric speech: Identifying the best-performing set of MFCC parameters and studying a speaker-independent approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 28, 102–110. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, H.V., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., Gunderson, J., & Perlman, A. (2009). Universal access: Preliminary experiments in dysarthric speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Brighton, United Kingdom: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Su, H.Y., Wu, C.H., & Tsai, P.J. (2008, March). Automatic assessment of articulation disorders using confident unit-based model adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 4513–4516). Las Vegas: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sundermeyer, M., Schlüter, R., & Ney, H. (2012). LSTM neural networks for language modelling. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Portland, OR: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H., Keshet, J., & Livescu, K. (2012, July). Discriminative pronunciation modelling: A large-margin, feature-rich approach. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1 (pp. 194–203). Jeju Island, Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, M., Wisler, A., Berisha, V., & Liss, J.M. (2016). The relationship between perceptual disturbances in dysarthric speech and automatic speech recognition performance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140, EL416–EL422. doi:10.1121/1.4967208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unser, M. (1984). On the approximation of the discrete Karhunen-Loeve transform for stationary processes. Signal Processing, 7, 231–249. doi:10.1016/0165-1684(84)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayalakshmi, P., Reddy, M.R., & O’Shaughnessy, D. (2006). Assessment of articulatory sub-systems of dysarthric speech using an isolated-style phoneme recognition system. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Pittsburgh, PA: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Villa-Canas, T., Belalcazar-Bolaños, E., Bedoya-Jaramillo, S., Garcés, J.F., Orozco-Arroyave, J.R., Arias-Londoño, J.D., & Vargas-Bonilla, J.F. (2012, September). Automatic detection of laryngeal pathologies using cepstral analysis in Mel and Bark scales. In Symposium of Image, Signal Processing, and Artificial Vision (STSIVA), 2012 XVII (pp. 116–121). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Windrich, M., Maier, A., Kohler, R., Nöth, E., Nkenke, E., Eysholdt, U., & Schuster, M. (2008). Automatic quantification of speech intelligibility of adults with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 60, 151–115. doi:10.1159/000121004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, S.M., & Young, S.J. (2000). Phone-level pronunciation scoring and assessment for interactive language learning. Speech Communication, 30, 95–108. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(99)00044-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. (1996). A review of large-vocabulary continuous-speech. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 13(5), 45. doi:10.1109/79.536824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, V., & Mihailidis, A. (2010). Difficulties in automatic speech recognition of dysarthric speakers and implications for speech-based applications used by the elderly: A literature review. Assistive Technology, 22, 99–112. doi:10.1080/10400435.2010.483646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Fraser, K., & Rudzicz, F. (2016). Speech recognition in Alzheimer's disease and in its assessment. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). San Francisco, CA: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Zeghidour, N., Usunier, N., Kokkinos, I., Schatz, T., Synnaeve, G., & Dupoux, E. (2018). Learning filterbanks from raw speech for phone recognition. In Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W., & Zierdt, A. (2008). Telediagnostic assessment of intelligibility in dysarthria: A pilot investigation of MVP-online. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 553–577. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar