Comparative analysis of legal mechanisms to net-zero: lessons from Germany, the United States, Brazil, and China

References

• Araújo KM. Routledge handbook of energy transitions. Routledge: Taylor & Francis; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Dray L, Schäfer AW, Grobler C, et al. Cost and emissions pathways towards net-zero climate impacts in aviation. Nat Clim Chang. 2022;12(10):956–962. doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01485-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataille CGF. Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. WIREs Clim Change. 2020;11(2):e633. doi: 10.1002/wcc.633.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille C, Waisman H, Colombier M, et al. The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. Clim Policy. 2016;16(sup1):S7–S26. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fankhauser S, Smith SM, Allen M, et al. The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nat Clim Chang. 2022;12(1):15–21. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner R. The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. Int Aff. 2016;92(5):1107–1125. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobuta G, Dubash NK, Upadhyaya P, et al. National climate change mitigation legislation, strategy and targets: a global update. Clim Policy. 2018;18(9):1114–1132. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1489772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotford E, Minas S. Probing the hidden depths of climate law: analysing national climate change legislation. Rev Euro Comp Intl Enviro. 2019;28(1):67–81. doi: 10.1111/reel.12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham C, Averchenkova A, Setzer J, et al. Accountability mechanisms in climate change framework laws. London: grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC Secretariat. NDC Synthesis Report 2022. Sharm el-Sheikh Climate Change Conference—November 2022 FCCC/PA/CMA/2022/4. Accessed: https://unfccc.int/ndc-synthesis-report-2022#:∼:text=Scope%20and%20Approach-,This%20version%20of%20the%20NDC%20synthesis%20report%20synthesizes%20information%20from,cent%20of%20the%20total%20global.
   Google Scholar
• Lin AC. Making net zero matter. Wash Lee L Rev. 2022;79(2):679–766.
   Google Scholar
• Tan X, Kong L, Gu B, et al. Research on the carbon neutrality governance under a polycentric approach. Adv Clim Change Res. 2022;13(2):159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2022.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale T, Smith SM, Black R, et al. Assessing the rapidly-emerging landscape of net zero targets. Clim Policy. 2022;22(1):18–29. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2021.2013155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erb T, Perciasepe B, Radulovic V, et al. Corporate climate commitments: the trend towards net zero. In: lackner M, Sajjadi B, Chen WY, editors. Handbook of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Cham: springer; 2022. 2985–3018.
   Google Scholar
• Sarra J. From ideas to action: governance paths to net zero. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson K, Black R, Chalkley P, et al. Net zero stocktake 2023: assessing the status and trends of net zero target setting across countries, subnational governments and companies. Oxford: net zero tracker (NewClimate institute, Oxford net zero, energy and climate intelligence unit and data-driven EnviroLab); 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell L, Mead S, van Berkel D. Standards for adjudicating the next generation of urgenda-style climate cases. JHRE. 2022;13(1):35–63. doi: 10.4337/jhre.2022.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin L. Companies and climate change: theory and law in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: cambridge University Press. 2021. doi: 10.1017/9781108689243.
   Google Scholar
• Black J. Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy. 2002;1:27.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon majors 2020 dataset. 2020 December [cited 2022 November 2022]. In: Climate Accountability Institute [Internet]. Available from: https://climateaccountability.org/carbon-majors-dataset-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Kosti N, Levi-Faur D, Mor G. Legislation and regulation: three analytical distinctions. Theory Pract Legis. 2019;7(3):169–178. doi: 10.1080/20508840.2019.1736369.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Change Laws of the World. London: grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics and Climate Policy Radar. 2023 [cited 2023 May 29]. Available from: https://climate-laws.org and https://app.climatepolicyradar.org/search.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank reference guide to climate change framework legislation. Washington (DC): world Bank Group; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Averchenkova A, Fankhauser S, Nachmay M. Trends in climate change legislation. Cheltenham, Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Climate Change Act of 12 December 2019. 2019. (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2513). As last amended by Article 1 of the Act of 18 August 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3905).
   Google Scholar
• Boettcher M, Schenuit F, Geden O. The formative phase of german carbon dioxide removal policy: positioning between precaution, pragmatism and innovation. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2023;98:103018. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation (EU). 2021. 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending. Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 [2021] L243/1.
   Google Scholar
• Flachsland C, Levi S. Germany’s federal climate change act. Environ Polit. 2021;30(sup1): 118–140. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2021.1980288.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Constitutional Court, Case. Nos. BvR 2656/18/1, BvR 78/20/1, BvR 96/20/1, BvR 288/20, 24 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Ohlendorf N, Spasova D. Carbon dioxide removals in EU member states. National frameworks for carbon dioxide removals: state of play and how to improve it. Berlin: Ecologic Institute; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• . Regulation (EU). 2018. 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU). Vol. 525/2018 and Decision No 529/2013/EU; 2018 OJ L156.
   Google Scholar
• Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals. [2022]. Com. 2022; 672 final.
   Google Scholar
• Mehr Fortschritt wagen. Bündnis für Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit. Koalitionsvertrag 2021-2025 zwischen der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands (SPD). Bündnis 90/die grünen und den freien demokraten (FDP). [dare more progress. Coalition for freedom, justice and sustainability. Coalition agreement 2021-2025 between the social democratic party of Germany (SPD), alliance 90/the greens and the free democrats (FDP)], bündnis 90/die grünen, freie demokratische partei (FDP). Düren: SPD; 2021. German.
   Google Scholar
• Modernisierungspaket für Klimaschutz und Planungsbeschleunigung. [Modernisation package for climate protection and planning acceleration]. German; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Chan T, Higham C. Evolving regulation of companies in climate change framework laws Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment [cited May 24 2023 May 24]. Available from: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/evolving-regulation-of-companies-in-climate-change-framework-laws.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf I, Friedrich TJ, Senger A, et al. Klimabezogene angaben in der nichtfinanziellen pflichtberichterstattung—deskriptive analyse und empirische evidenz zur berichtsqualität der DAX30-Unternehmen [climate-related disclosures in mandatory non-financial reporting—descriptive analysis and empirical evidence on reporting quality of DAX30 companies]. Zeitschrift für umweltpolitik und umweltrecht. 2020;4:460–496.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch A, Velte P. Climate reporting quality following the recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures: a focus on the german capital market. Sustain Dev. 2023;31(2):926–940. doi: 10.1002/sd.2430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive (EU). 2022. 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 537/2014. Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU. As regards corporate sustainability reporting 2022] OJ L322.
   Google Scholar
• Paris agreement. Nationally determined contribution (NDC), reducing greenhouse gases in the United States: a 2030 emissions target. The United States of America; 2021. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/United%20States%20NDC%20April%2021%202021%20Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. Executive Order 14008 on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad; 2021 January 27. Washington, (DC). Available from: WH.gov [cited 24 October 2023]. Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/executive-order-on-tackling-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad/.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Act. New York. [Cited May 17 2023]. Available from: https://climate.ny.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Glicksman RL, Levy RE. Administrative law: agency action in legal context. 3rd ed. St. Paul (MN): West Academic; 2020. p. 154.
   Google Scholar
• SEC.gov. The enhancement and standardization of climate-related disclosures for investors; 2022 Mar 21. Washington, (DC): Securities Exchange Commission [cited 2023 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2022/33-11042.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federal law No. 12. Vols. 187/2009, establishing the National Policy on Climate Change (Brazil). Available from: https://climate-laws.org/document/law-12-187-2009-establishing-the-national-policy-on-climate-change-npcc-regulated-by-decree-7-390-2010_dd44.
   Google Scholar
• Paris agreement. Nationally determined contribution (NDC). Brasília: Federative Republic of Brazil; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• FGVces. Net zero political economy briefs: Brazil case-study. São paulo (SP): fundação getulio Vargas center for sustainability studies. 2022. 45. Cropper Mawer R, Leech S, Lum N, et al. UK/EU/US/China/Brazil—corporate reporting of environmental matters under the Companies Act 2006. Clyde & Co; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Central Bank Resolution No. 139/2021 requires the disclosure of the Report on Social. Environmental and Climate Risks and Opportunities as of December 1, 2022. Available from: https://www.bcb.gov.br/content/financialstability/Brazilian_Prudential_Financial_Regulation_Docs/ResolutionBCB139.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Decree F. Brazil. Vol. 11 (075/2022). Available from https://climate-laws.org/document/federal-decree-no-11-5-2022-creating-the-national-system-for-the-reduction-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions-sinare-and-establishes-the-procedure-for-the-elaboration-of-sectorial-plans-for-mitigation-of-climate-changes_66ca?l=brazil&c=Policies&q=Federal+Decree+No.+11%2C075/2022.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia M, Ouro A, Rocha R, et al. How to unlock the potential of a Brazil neutral in GHG by 2060? Paths of decarbonization for the Brazilian economy. Sao Paulo: CDP Latin America; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues M. Will Brazil’s President Lula keep his climate promises? Nature [Internet]. 2023 January 6 [cited 2023 May 29]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00011-6.
   Google Scholar
• The Chinese central government’s official web portal. Network. The fourteenth Five-Year plan for the national economic and social development of th4e People’s Republic Of China and outline of long term goals for 2035. 13-03-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kai X, Guangdong T. Codification and prospect of China’s codification of environmental law from the perspective of global environmental governance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):9978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang AL. Explaining environmental information disclosure in China. Ecol Law Q. 2018;44:865–924. doi: 10.15779/Z386688J63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measures for the Management of Legal Disclosure of Enterprise Environmental Information - Ministry of Ecology and Environment website. (translated using Google Translate) https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk02/202112/t20211221_964837.html?mc_cid=45e6a7ad33&mc_eid=627c47469b.
   Google Scholar
• China’s new national carbon trading market: between promise and pessimism. Washington (DC): Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2021 [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-new-national-carbon-trading-market-between-promise-and-pessimism.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Yao Y, Wang X. The first compliance cycle of china’s national emissions trading scheme: insights and implications. Carb Neutrality. 2022;1(34):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s43979-022-00035-3.
   Google Scholar
• Peel J, Osofsky HM. Climate change litigation. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2020;16(1):21–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-022420-122936.
   Google Scholar
• Setzer J, Higham C. Global trends in climate change litigation: 2022. Snapshot. London: grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ekardt F, Heyl K. The german constitutional verdict is a landmark in climate litigation. Nat Clim Chang. 2022;12(8):697–699. doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01419-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnerop P. The ‘advance interference-like effect’ of climate targets: fundamental rights, intergenerational equity and the german federal constitutional court. J Environ Law. 2022;34(1):135–162. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqab041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calliess C. Das “klimaurteil” des bundesverfassungsgerichts: “versubjektivierung” des. Art. 20a GG? [“climate ruling” of the federal constitutional court: “subjectifying” art. 20a basic law?]. zeitschrift für umweltrecht. 2021; 6:355–357.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzé LJ. Versus Germany: planetary climate litigation for the anthropocene? Ger Law J. 2021;22(8):1423–1444. doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.87.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Umwelthilfe v. Germany (re LULUCF) Higher Administrative Court, Berlin, Brandenburg. (filed 23 November 2022, pending).
   Google Scholar
• Lamy C, Ludwig J. Die. Werbung mit Klimaneutralität [Advertising of climate neutrality]. Klima recht. 2022;1(5):142–147.
   Google Scholar
• Steuer S. “Klimaneutrale” produkte im lauterkeitsrecht [“climate neutral” products in fair trading law]. Gewerblicher rechtsschutz und urheberrecht. 2022;19: 1408–1417.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law Gazette I. Act against Unfair Competition in the version published on 3 March 2010 (Federal Law Gazette I. Federal Law Gazette I, p. As Last Amended by Article 3 of the Act of 10 August 2021. 3433; 254.
   Google Scholar
• Übersicht der DUH-Verfahren zu Klimaneutralitäts-Werbeversprechen (Stand: 02 juni 2023) [Overview of DUH proceedings on climate neutrality advertising promises (Status: 02 June 2023)] [Internet]. Environmental Action Germany; 2023. German; [cited 2023 May 2]. Available from: https://www.duh.de/fileadmin/user_upload/download/Projektinformation/Verbraucher/2023-01-17_Übersicht_DUH_Verfahren_Klimaneutralität.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin L. The road to paris leads to Delaware: Climate litigation and directors’ duties. 2 Utah Law Review. 2020: 313.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol K. Seeking (some) climate justice in state tort law. Wash Law Rev. 2020;95(3):1383.
   Google Scholar
• CEQA. 2016. California environmental quality act. Public Resources Code 21000–21189. Available from: https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/2016_CEQA_Statutes_and_Guidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Golden Door Properties. LLC v. County of San Diego. U.S. Cal. Ct. App. 2020. D075328.
   Google Scholar
• C2ES.org. U.S. State Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets. Washington (DC): Center for Climate and Energy Solutions; [updated 2022 August; cited 2023 June 19]. Available from: https://www.c2es.org/document/greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets/#:∼:text=Currently%2C%2025%20states%20and%20the,that%20met%20its%202020%20goal.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Biological Diversity v. F. & W. U.S. Cal. Ct. App. Ca Dept of. 2011: b 280815.
   Google Scholar
• California Native Plant Society versus County of LA, U.S. Ca. Vol. l. CT App. Vol. 2012. B258090.
   Google Scholar
• Federalreserve.gov. Available from: https://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/supmanual/cch/200806/ftca.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. FTC Charges Volkswagen Deceived Consumers with Its “Clean Diesel” campaign; March 29, 2016. Available from: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2016/03/ftc-charges-volkswagen-deceived-consumers-its-clean-diesel-campaign.
   Google Scholar
• HOPE of Kentucky v Cameron U.S.E.D. Vol. 3. KY; 2022. p. 22-cv-00062.
   Google Scholar
• Two-hundred v CAARB. The two hundred for homeownership v. California Air Resources Board. U.S. E.D. Cal. 2022;1:2 2–904.
   Google Scholar
• JBS. JSB net-zero 2040 [Internet] JBS; 2021 [cited 2023 May 29]. Available from: https://jbs.com.br/netzero/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S. The great climate greenwash: global meat giant JBS’ emissions leap by 51% in five years. Minneapolis: institute for agriculture and trade policy; 2022 [cited 2023 May 29]. Available from: https://www.iatp.org/jbs-emissions-rising-despite-net-zero-pledge#:∼:text=IATP%27s%20new%20emissions%20estimates%20for,annual%20general%20meeting%20(AGM).
   Google Scholar
• Mighty Earth; 2023. Mighty Earth files complaint with US Securities and Exchange Commission against JBS ‘green bonds’ [cited 2023 May 29]. Available from: https://www.mightyearth.org/whistleblower-complaint-to-the-securities-and-exchange-commission-against-jbs/.
   Google Scholar
• The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. Internet; Translated with Google Translate]. Beijing, China; 2023. June 1, 2023]. Available from: https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Buser A. Of carbon budgets, factual uncertainties, and intergenerational equity—the german constitutional court’s climate decision. Ger Law J. 2021;22(8):1409–1422. doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.81.
   Google Scholar