Comparison of major carbon offset standards for soil carbon projects in Australian grazing lands

References

• Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1492):815–830. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma. 2004;123(1–2):1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batjes NH. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci. 1996;47(2):151–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel C, Matschullat J, Zurba K, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—a review. Geochemistry. 2016;76(3):327–352. doi: 10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraseni TN, Cockfield G. Does the adoption of zero tillage reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An assessment for the grains industry in Australia. Agri Sys. 2011;104(6):451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int. 2003;29(4):437–450. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00192-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal RC, Thornton CM, Allen DE, et al. Long-term land use change in Australia from native forest decreases all fractions of soil organic carbon, including resistant organic carbon, for cropping but not sown pasture. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2021;311:107326. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R, Monger C, Nave L, et al. The role of soil in regulation of climate. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021;376(1834):20210084. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syswerda SP, Corbin AT, Mokma DL, et al. Agricultural management and soil carbon storage in surface vs. deep layers. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75(1):92–101. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraseni TN, Mathers NJ, Harms B, et al. Comparing and predicting soil carbon quantities under different land use systems on the red ferrosol soils of southeast Queensland. J Soil Water Conserv. 2008;63(4):250–256. doi: 10.2489/jswc.63.4.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhart DL, Johnson HB, Mayeux HS, et al. The CRP increases soil organic carbon. J Soil Water Conserv. 1994;49(5):488–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelikova J, Chay F, Freeman J. A buyer’s guide to soil carbon offsets. Carbon Plan. 2021;15. https://carbonplan.org/research/soil-protocols-explainer
   Google Scholar
• Deng HM, Liang QM, Liu LJ, et al. Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environ Res Lett. 2018;12(12):123001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa98d2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer JP, Gupta J. The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;57:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymczak LS, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Lurette A, et al. System diversification and grazing management as resilience-enhancing agricultural practices: the case of crop-livestock integration. Agric Syst. 2020;184:102904. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockmann U, Adams MA, Crawford JW, et al. The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2013;164:80–99. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant RT, Cerri CEP, Osborne BB, et al. Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Ecol Appl. 2017;27(2):662–668. doi: 10.1002/eap.1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan G, Smith P, Pan W. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining the productivity and yield stability of cereals in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2009;129(1–3):344–348. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EY. Stocktake and analysis of international carbon offset programs. Canberra: Climate Change Authority; 2022. Available from: https://www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Verra. Verra annual report [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. Available from: https://verra.org/datainsights/april-2020
   Google Scholar
• Gold standard. Gold standard market report [Internet]; 2020. Available from: https://www.goldstandard.org/blog-item/gold-standard-market-report-2020
   Google Scholar
• Clean Energy Regulator. Carbon credits (carbon farming initiative – estimation of soil organic carbon sequestration using measurement and models) methodology determination; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Clean Energy Regulator. Quarterly carbon market report [Internet]; 2023. Available from: https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Infohub/Markets/quarterly-carbon-market-reports/quarterly-carbon-market-report-june-2023
   Google Scholar
• Kragt ME, Dumbrell NP, Blackmore L. Motivations and barriers for Western Australian broad-acre farmers to adopt carbon farming. Environ Sci Policy. 2017;73:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White RE. The role of soil carbon sequestration as a climate change mitigation strategy: an Australian case study. Soil Syst. 2022;6(2):46. doi: 10.3390/soilsystems6020046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider L, La Hoz Theuer S. Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Cli Pol. 2019;19(3):386–400. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekhoff D, Gillenwater M, Colbert-Sangree T, et al. Securing climate benefit: a guide to using carbon offsets. Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute Greenhouse Gas Management Institute; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding-Fecher R, Broekhoff D. Assessing crediting scheme standards and practices for ensuring unit quality under the Paris Agreement. Carb Manage. 2021;12(6):635–648. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2021.1994016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelowa A, Espelage A, Hoch S. Co-benefits under the market mechanisms of the Paris Agreement. In: Buchholz W, Markandya A, Rubbelke D, Vogele S, editors. Ancillary benefits of climate policy: new theoretical developments and empirical findings. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 51–67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30978-7_3.
   Google Scholar
• Maraseni TN, Pandey SS. Can vegetation types of work as an indicator of soil organic carbon? An insight from native vegetations in Nepal. Ecol Indic. 2014;46:315–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmus A, Zink H, Polycarp C. Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: a comparison of carbon offset standards. WWF Germany; 2008. p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Offset Quality Initiative. Ensuring offset quality: integrating high quality greenhouse gas offsets into North American cap-and-trade policy [Internet]; 2008. Available from: https://ghginstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/OQI_Ensuring_Offset_Quality_Jul08.Pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gillenwater M, Broekhoff D, Trexler M, et al. Policing the voluntary carbon market. Nature Clim Change. 2007;1(711):85–87. doi: 10.1038/climate.2007.58.
   Google Scholar
• Richards KR, Huebner GE. Evaluating protocols and standards for forest carbon-offset programs, part A: additionality, baselines and permanence. Carb Manage. 2012;3(4):393–410. doi: 10.4155/cmt.12.38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freestone D. The environmental and social safeguard policies of the world bank and the evolving role of the inspection panel. In: The World Bank and sustainable development; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013. p. 43–71. doi: 10.1163/9789004202337_004.
   Google Scholar
• Wongpiyabovorn O, Plastina A, Crespi JM. Challenges to voluntary Ag carbon markets. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2022:45:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh A, Roberts G, Buchan S. Improving carbon markets to increase farmer participation. Australia: AgriFutures Australia Publication; 2019. p. 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnett A, Behrendt R, Ho C, et al. The carbon credits and economic return of environmental plantings on a prime lamb property in South Eastern Australia. Land Use Policy. 2016;52:374–381. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2022. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-0.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JA, Follett RF, Allen LH, et al. Carbon sequestration in agricultural lands of the United States. J Soil Water Conserv. 2010;65(1):6A–13A. doi: 10.2489/jswc.65.1.6A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radrizzani A, Shelton HM, Dalzell SA, et al. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen under Leucaena leucocephala pastures in Queensland. Crop Pasture Sci. 2011;62(4):337–345. doi: 10.1071/CP10115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante M, Robledo‐Abad C, Harper R, et al. Co‐benefits, trade‐offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(10):3270–3290. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham SC, Mac Nally R, Baker PJ, et al. Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural regions. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2015;17(4):301–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming A, Stitzlein C, Jakku E, et al. Missed opportunity? Framing actions around co-benefits for carbon mitigation in Australian agriculture. Land Use Policy. 2019;85:230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin BB, Macfadyen S, Renwick AR, et al. Maximizing the environmental benefits of carbon farming through ecosystem service delivery. Bioscience. 2013;63(10):793–803. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.10.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. Queensland land restoration fund; 2021. Available from: https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/116548/lrf-co-benefits-standard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. Estimating the costs of reducing forest emissions: a review of methods. CIFOR Working Paper; 2008. p. 42. Indonesia: CIFOR,
   Google Scholar